Environment

Records

Documents

Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.

• Domstolens dom (tredje avdelningen) av den 21 december 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus mot Comune di Venezia m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – Direktiv 2001/42/EG – Bedömning av vissa planers och programs miljöpåverkan – Artikel 3.3 – Planer och program som kräver en miljöbedömning endast om medlemsstaterna finner att de kan antas medföra betydande miljöpåverkan – Fråga om giltighet mot bakgrund av FEU-fördraget och Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna – Begreppet användning av ’små områden på lokal nivå’ – Nationell lagstiftning som hänvisar till de berörda områdenas yta.#Mål C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Suda (treće vijeće) od 21. prosinca 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus protiv Comune di Venezia i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Direktiva 2001/42/EZ – Procjena učinaka određenih planova i programa na okoliš – Članak 3. stavak 3. – Planovi i programi za koje je potrebna procjena okoliša samo ako države članice utvrde da mogu imati značajne učinke na okoliš – Valjanost s obzirom na UFEU i Povelju Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Pojam uporabe ‚malih površina na lokalnoj razini’ – Nacionalni propis koji upućuje na veličinu predmetnih površina.#Predmet C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τρίτο τμήμα) της 21ης Δεκεμβρίου 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus κατά Comune di Venezia κ.λπ.#Αίτηση του Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Οδηγία 2001/42/ΕΚ – Εκτίμηση των περιβαλλοντικών επιπτώσεων ορισμένων σχεδίων και προγραμμάτων – Άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 3 – Σχέδια και προγράμματα που υποβάλλονται υποχρεωτικά σε εκτίμηση περιβαλλοντικών επιπτώσεων μόνον όταν τα κράτη μέλη αποφασίζουν ότι ενδέχεται να έχουν σημαντικές επιπτώσεις στο περιβάλλον – Κύρος, υπό το πρίσμα της Συνθήκης ΛΕΕ και του Χάρτη των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης – Έννοια της χρήσης “μικρών περιοχών σε τοπικό επίπεδο” – Εθνική ρύθμιση αναφερόμενη στην έκταση των οικείων περιοχών.#Υπόθεση C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Wyrok Trybunału (trzecia izba) z dnia 21 grudnia 2016 r.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus przeciwko Comune di Venezia i in.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Dyrektywa 2001/42/WE – Ocena skutków wywieranych przez niektóre plany i programy na środowisko naturalne – Artykuł 3 ust. 3 – Plany i programy wymagające oceny ich wpływu na środowisko, wyłącznie gdy państwa członkowskie stwierdzą, że mogą one mieć znaczący wpływ na środowisko – Ważność w świetle traktatu FUE i Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Pojęcie użytkowania „małych obszarów na poziomie lokalnym” – Przepisy krajowe odwołujące się do powierzchni danych obszarów.#Sprawa C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tal-21 ta’ Diċembru 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus vs Comune di Venezia et.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mit-Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Direttiva 2001/42/KE – Evalwazzjoni tal-effetti ta’ ċerti pjanijiet u programmi fuq l-ambjent – Artikolu 3(3) – Pjanijiet u programmi obbligatorjament suġġetti għal evalwazzjoni ambjentali unikament meta l-Istati Membri jistabbilixxu li huma jistgħu jkollhom effetti sinjifikattivi fuq l-ambjent – Validità fir-rigward tat-Trattat FUE u tal-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Kunċett ta’ użu ta’ ‘żoni żgħar fil-livell lokali’ – Leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tagħmel riferiment għas-superfiċji taż-żoni kkonċernati.#Kawża C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Euroopa Kohtu otsus (kolmas koda), 21.12.2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus versus Comune di Venezia jt.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Direktiiv 2001/42/EÜ – Teatavate kavade ja programmide keskkonnamõju hindamine – Artikli 3 lõige 3 – Kavad ja programmid, mille keskkonnamõju tuleb hinnata ainult siis, kui liikmesriigid otsustavad, et neil on tõenäoliselt oluline keskkonnamõju – Kehtivus EL toimimise lepingu ja Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta seisukohalt – Mõiste „väikese piirkonna kasutamine kohalikul tasandil“ – Siseriiklikud õigusnormid, milles viidatakse asjaomaste piirkondade pindalale.#Kohtuasi C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 21. december 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus mod Comune di Venezia m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – direktiv 2001/42/EF – vurdering af bestemte planers og programmers indvirkning på miljøet – artikel 3, stk. 3 – planer og programmer, for hvilke der kun skal gennemføres en miljøvurdering, hvis medlemsstaten fastslår, at de kan få væsentlig indvirkning på miljøet – gyldighed i forhold til EUF-traktaten og Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – begrebet »mindre områder på lokalt plan« – national lovgivning, der henviser til de pågældende områders areal.#Sag C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 21 december 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus tegen Comune di Venezia e.a.#Verzoek van de Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Richtlijn 2001/42/EG – Beoordeling van de gevolgen voor het milieu van bepaalde plannen en programma’s – Artikel 3, lid 3 – Plannen en programma’s waarvoor een milieubeoordeling alleen dan verplicht is wanneer de lidstaten bepalen dat deze aanzienlijke milieueffecten kunnen hebben – Geldigheid ten aanzien van het VWEU en het Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Begrip gebruik van ,kleine gebieden op lokaal niveau’ – Nationale regeling waarbij de oppervlakte van de betrokken gebieden in aanmerking wordt genomen.#Zaak C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 décembre 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus contre Comune di Venezia e.a.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2001/42/CE – Évaluation des incidences de certains plans et programmes sur l’environnement – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Plans et programmes obligatoirement soumis à une évaluation environnementale uniquement lorsque les États membres établissent qu’ils sont susceptibles d’avoir des incidences notables sur l’environnement – Validité au regard du traité FUE et de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Notion d’utilisation de “petites zones au niveau local” – Réglementation nationale faisant référence à la superficie des zones concernées.#Affaire C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2016 m. gruodžio 21 d. Teisingumo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus prieš Comune di Venezia ir kt.#Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Direktyva 2001/42/EB – Tam tikrų planų ir programų poveikio aplinkai vertinimas – 3 straipsnio 3 dalis – Planai ir programos, kurių aplinkosauginis vertinimas privalomas tik tuomet, kai valstybės narės nustato, kad jie gali turėti reikšmingų pasekmių aplinkai – Galiojimas atsižvelgiant į ESV sutartį ir Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartiją – „Nedidelių plotų vietiniu lygiu“ naudojimo sąvoka – Nacionalinės teisės aktai, kuriuose nurodomas atitinkamų teritorijų plotas.#Byla C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 21. decembra 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus proti Comune di Venezia in drugi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Direktiva 2001/42/ES – Presoja vplivov nekaterih načrtov in programov na okolje – Člen 3(3) – Načrti in programi, pri katerih je okoljska presoja potrebna le, kadar države članice ugotovijo, da bi lahko znatno vplivali na okolje – Veljavnost glede na Pogodbo DEU in Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Pojem rabe ,majhnega območja na lokalni ravni‘ – Nacionalna zakonodaja, ki se sklicuje na površino zadevnih območij.#Zadeva C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Tercera) de 21 de diciembre de 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus contra Comune di Venezia y otros.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Directiva 2001/42/CE — Evaluación de los efectos de determinados planes y programas en el medio ambiente — Artículo 3, apartado 3 — Planes y programas que únicamente requieren una evaluación medioambiental si los Estados miembros deciden que es probable que tengan efectos significativos en el medio ambiente — Validez con respecto al Tratado FUE y a la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea — Concepto de uso de “zonas pequeñas a nivel local” — Normativa nacional que hace referencia a la superficie de las zonas afectadas.#Asunto C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Hotărârea Curții (Camera a treia) din 21 decembrie 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus împotriva Comune di Venezia și alții.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Directiva 2001/42/CE – Evaluarea efectelor anumitor planuri și programe asupra mediului – Articolul 3 alineatul (3) – Planuri și programe care necesită o evaluare ecologică numai în cazul în care statele membre stabilesc că pot avea efecte semnificative asupra mediului – Validitate în raport cu Tratatul FUE și cu Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene – Noțiunea de utilizare a „zonelor mici la nivel local”– Reglementare națională care face trimitere la suprafața zonelor vizate.#Cauza C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 21. Dezember 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus gegen Comune di Venezia u.a.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Richtlinie 2001/42/EG – Prüfung der Umweltauswirkungen bestimmter Pläne und Programme – Art. 3 Abs. 3 – Pläne und Programme, die nur dann einer Umweltprüfung bedürfen, wenn die Mitgliedstaaten feststellen, dass sie voraussichtlich erhebliche Umweltauswirkungen haben – Gültigkeit im Hinblick auf den AEU-Vertrag und die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Begriff der Nutzung ‚kleiner Gebiete auf lokaler Ebene‘ – Nationale Regelung, die auf die Fläche der betreffenden Gebiete abstellt.#Rechtssache C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza della Corte (Terza Sezione) del 21 dicembre 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus contro Comune di Venezia e a.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta da Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Ambiente – Direttiva 2001/42/CE – Valutazione degli effetti di determinati piani e programmi sull’ambiente – Articolo 3, paragrafo 3 – Piani e programmi obbligatoriamente soggetti ad una valutazione ambientale solo se gli Stati membri determinano che essi possono avere effetti significativi sull’ambiente – Validità alla luce del Trattato FUE e della Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea – Nozione di uso di “piccole aree a livello locale” – Normativa nazionale che fa riferimento alla superficie delle aree interessate.#Causa C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Bíróság ítélete (harmadik tanács), 2016. december 21.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus kontra Comune di Venezia és társai.#A Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto (Olaszország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – 2001/42/EK irányelv – Bizonyos tervek és programok környezeti hatásvizsgálata – A 3. cikk (3) bekezdése – Tervek és programok, amelyek csak abban az esetben igényelnek kötelező környezeti vizsgálatot, ha a tagállamok úgy határoznak, hogy azoknak valószínűleg jelentős hatásuk van a környezetre – Az EUM‑Szerződésre és az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartájára tekintettel való érvényesség – A »helyi szinten kis területek« használatának fogalma – Az érintett területek méretére utaló nemzeti szabályozás.#C-444/15. sz. ügy.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tiesas spriedums (trešā palāta), 2016. gada 21. decembris.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus pret Comune di Venezia u.c.#Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Direktīva 2001/42/EK – Noteiktu plānu un programmu ietekmes uz vidi novērtējums – 3. panta 3. punkts – Plāni un programmas, attiecībā uz kuriem ietekmes uz vidi novērtējums ir obligāti jāveic tikai tad, ja dalībvalstis konstatē, ka tiem varētu būt būtiska ietekme uz vidi – Spēkā esamība, ņemot vērā LESD un Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību hartu – Jēdziens “nelielu teritoriju izmantošana vietējā līmenī” – Valsts tiesiskais regulējums, kurā ir atsauce uz attiecīgo teritoriju platību.#Lieta C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Съда (трети състав) от 21 декември 2016 г.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus срещу Comune di Venezia и др.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Директива 2001/42/ЕО — Оценка на последиците на някои планове и програми върху околната среда — Член 3, параграф 3 — Планове и програми, за които задължително се извършва екологична оценка само когато държавите членки установят, че те могат да имат съществени последици върху околната среда — Валидност с оглед на Договора за функционирането на ЕС и Хартата на основните права на Европейския съюз — Понятие за използване на „малки площи на местно ниво“ — Национална правна уредба, в която се взема предвид размерът на засегнатите площи.#Дело C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (tretia komora) z 21. decembra 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus proti Comune di Venezia a i.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Smernica 2001/42/ES – Posudzovanie účinkov určitých plánov a programov na životné prostredie – Článok 3 ods. 3 – Plány a programy, ktoré vyžadujú environmentálne posudzovanie iba v prípade, ak členské štáty určia, že majú pravdepodobne významné účinky na životné prostredie – Platnosť vzhľadom na Zmluvu o FEÚ a Chartu základných práv Európskej únie – Pojem využívanie ‚malých území na miestnej úrovni‘ – Vnútroštátna právna úprava, ktorá odkazuje na plochu dotknutých území.#Vec C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Terceira Secção) de 21 de dezembro de 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus contra Comune di Venezia e o.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto.#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Diretiva 2001/42/CE — Avaliação dos efeitos de determinados planos e programas no ambiente — Artigo 3.o, n.o 3 — Planos e programas que só estão obrigatoriamente sujeitos a avaliação ambiental quando os Estados‑Membros determinarem que são suscetíveis de ter efeitos significativos no ambiente — Validade à luz do Tratado FUE e da Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União Europeia — Conceito de utilização de ‘pequenas áreas a nível local’ — Legislação nacional que faz referência à superfície das áreas em causa.#Processo C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kolmas jaosto) 21.12.2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus vastaan Comune di Venezia ym.#Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneton esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Direktiivi 2001/42/EY – Tiettyjen suunnitelmien ja ohjelmien ympäristövaikutusten arviointi – 3 artiklan 3 kohta – Suunnitelmat ja ohjelmat, joista edellytetään ympäristöarviointia ainoastaan, jos jäsenvaltiot määrittelevät, että niillä on todennäköisesti merkittäviä ympäristövaikutuksia – Pätevyys EUT-sopimuksen ja Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirjan kannalta – Käsite ”pienten alueiden” käyttö ”paikallisella tasolla” – Kansallinen säännöstö, jossa viitataan asianomaisten alueiden pinta-alaan.#Asia C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudek Soudního dvora (třetího senátu) ze dne 21. prosince 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v. Comune di Venezia a další.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Směrnice 2001/42/ES – Posuzování vlivů některých plánů a programů na životní prostředí – Článek 3 odst. 3 – Plány a programy, které vyžadují posouzení vlivů na životní prostředí pouze tehdy, stanoví-li členské státy, že mohou mít významný vliv na životní prostředí – Platnost s ohledem na Smlouvu o FEU a Listinu základních práv Evropské unie – Pojem využití ‚menších oblastí na místní úrovni‘ – Vnitrostátní právní úprava, která odkazuje na plochu dotyčných oblastí.#Věc C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016.#Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Article 3(3) — Plans and programmes which require an environmental assessment only where the Member States determine that they are likely to have significant environmental effects — Validity in the light of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Meaning of use of ‘small areas at local level’ — National legislation referring to the size of the areas concerned.#Case C-444/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusions de l'avocat général Mme E. Sharpston, présentées le 21 décembre 2016.#Avis rendu en vertu de l'article 218, paragraphe 11, TFUE.#Avis rendu en vertu de l’article 218, paragraphe 11, TFUE – Accord de libre‑échange entre l’Union européenne et la République de Singapour – Accord “nouvelle génération” négocié après l’entrée en vigueur des traités UE et FUE – Compétence pour conclure l’accord – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous e), TFUE – Politique commerciale commune – Article 207, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Échanges de marchandises et de services – Investissements étrangers directs – Marchés publics – Aspects commerciaux de la propriété intellectuelle – Concurrence – Commerce avec les États tiers et développement durable – Protection sociale des travailleurs – Protection de l’environnement – Article 207, paragraphe 5, TFUE – Services dans le domaine des transports – Article 3, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Accord international susceptible d’affecter des règles communes ou d’en altérer la portée – Règles de droit dérivé de l’Union en matière de libre prestation des services dans le domaine des transports – Investissements étrangers autres que directs – Article 216 TFUE – Accord nécessaire pour réaliser l’un des objectifs des traités – Libre circulation des capitaux et des paiements entre États membres et États tiers – Succession de traités en matière d’investissements – Remplacement des accords d’investissement entre des États membres et la République de Singapour – Dispositions institutionnelles de l’accord – Règlement des différends entre investisseurs et États – Règlement des différends entre les parties.#Avis 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Προτάσεις της γενικής εισαγγελέα E. Sharpston της 21ης Δεκεμβρίου 2016.#Γνωμοδότηση εκδοθείσα δυνάμει του άρθρου 218, παράγραφος 11, ΣΛΕΕ.#Γνωμοδότηση εκδοθείσα δυνάμει του άρθρου 218, παράγραφος 11, ΣΛΕΕ – Συμφωνία Ελευθέρων Συναλλαγών μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και της Δημοκρατίας της Σινγκαπούρης – Συμφωνία “νέας γενιάς” της οποίας η διαπραγμάτευση διεξήχθη μετά την έναρξη ισχύος των Συνθηκών ΕΕ και ΛΕΕ – Αρμοδιότητα για τη σύναψη της συμφωνίας – Άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 1, στοιχείο εʹ, ΣΛΕΕ – Κοινή εμπορική πολιτική – Άρθρο 207, παράγραφος 1, ΣΛΕΕ – Ανταλλαγές εμπορευμάτων και υπηρεσιών – Άμεσες ξένες επενδύσεις – Δημόσιες Συμβάσεις – Εμπορικές πτυχές της διανοητικής ιδιοκτησίας – Ανταγωνισμός – Εμπόριο με τα τρίτα κράτη και αειφόρος ανάπτυξη – Κοινωνική προστασία των εργαζομένων – Προστασία του περιβάλλοντος – Άρθρο 207, παράγραφος 5, ΣΛΕΕ – Υπηρεσίες στον τομέα των μεταφορών – Άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 2, ΣΛΕΕ – Διεθνής συμφωνία που ενδέχεται να επηρεάσει τους κοινούς κανόνες ή να μεταβάλει την εμβέλειά τους – Κανόνες του παράγωγου δικαίου της Ένωσης περί ελεύθερης παροχής υπηρεσιών στον τομέα των μεταφορών – Ξένες επενδύσεις πλην των άμεσων – Άρθρο 216 ΣΛΕΕ – Συμφωνία αναγκαία για την επίτευξη ενός εκ των στόχων των Συνθηκών – Ελεύθερη κίνηση κεφαλαίων και ελεύθερη διενέργεια πληρωμών μεταξύ κρατών μελών και τρίτων κρατών – Διαδοχή συνθηκών στον τομέα των επενδύσεων – Αντικατάσταση επενδυτικών συμφωνιών μεταξύ των κρατών μελών και της Δημοκρατίας της Σινγκαπούρης – Θεσμικές διατάξεις της συμφωνίας – Διευθέτηση διαφορών μεταξύ επενδυτών και κρατών – Διευθέτηση διαφορών μεταξύ των συμβαλλομένων μερών.#Γνωμοδότηση 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Generalinės advokatės E. Sharpston išvada, pateikta 2016 m. gruodžio 21 d.#Pagal SESV 218 straipsnio 11 dalį pateikta nuomonė.#Pagal SESV 218 straipsnio 11 dalį pateikta nuomonė – Europos Sąjungos ir Singapūro Respublikos laisvosios prekybos susitarimas – „Naujosios kartos“ prekybos susitarimas, dėl kurio derėtasi įsigaliojus ES ir ESV sutartims – Kompetencija sudaryti susitarimą – SESV 3 straipsnio 1 dalies e punktas – Bendra prekybos politika – SESV 207 straipsnio 1 dalis – Prekyba prekėmis ir paslaugomis – Tiesioginės užsienio investicijos – Viešieji pirkimai – Intelektinės nuosavybės komerciniai aspektai – Konkurencija – Prekyba su trečiosiomis šalimis ir tvarus vystymasis – Socialinė darbuotojų apsauga – Aplinkos apsauga – SESV 207 straipsnio 5 dalis – Paslaugos transporto srityje – SESV 3 straipsnio 2 dalis – Tarptautinis susitarimas, galintis daryti poveikį bendroms taisyklėms ar pakeisti jų taikymo sritį – Sąjungos antrinės teisės nuostatos dėl laisvo paslaugų teikimo transporto srityje – Netiesioginės užsienio investicijos – SESV 216 straipsnis – Susitarimas, būtinas vienam iš Sutarčių tikslų įgyvendinti – Laisvas kapitalo judėjimas ir mokėjimai tarp valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių – Sutarčių dėl investicijų perėmimas – Valstybių narių ir Singapūro Respublikos investicinių susitarimų pakeitimas – Susitarimo institucinės nuostatos – Investuotojų ir valstybių ginčų sprendimas – Šalių ginčų sprendimas.#Nuomonė 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Concluziile avocatului general E. Sharpston prezentate la 21 decembrie 2016.#Aviz dat în temeiul articolului 218 alineatul (11) TFUE.#Aviz emis în temeiul articolului 218 alineatul (11) TFUE – Acordul de liber schimb între Uniunea Europeană și Republica Singapore – Acord de „nouă generație” negociat după intrarea în vigoare a Tratatelor UE și FUE – Competența de a încheia acordul – Articolul 3 alineatul (1) litera (e) TFUE – Politica comercială comună – Articolul 207 alineatul (1) TFUE – Schimburi de mărfuri și de servicii – Investiții străine directe – Achiziții publice – Aspecte comerciale ale proprietății intelectuale – Concurență – Comerț cu statele terțe și dezvoltare durabilă – Protecția socială a lucrătorilor – Protecția mediului – Articolul 207 alineatul (5) TFUE – Servicii în domeniul transporturilor – Articolul 3 alineatul (2) TFUE – Acord internațional care ar putea aduce atingere normelor comune sau ar putea modifica domeniul de aplicare al acestora – Norme de drept derivat al Uniunii în materie de liberă prestare a serviciilor în domeniul transporturilor – Alte investiții străine decât cele directe – Articolul 216 TFUE – Acord necesar pentru realizarea unuia dintre obiectivele tratatelor – Libera circulație a capitalurilor și a plăților între state membre și state terțe – Tratate succesive în materie de investiții – Înlocuirea acordurilor de investiții dintre statele membre și Republica Singapore – Dispoziții instituționale ale acordului – Soluționarea litigiilor dintre investitori și stat – Soluționarea litigiilor dintre părți.#Avizul 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali E. Sharpston, ippreżentati fil-21 ta’ Diċembru 2016.#Opinjoni mogħtija skont l-Artikolu 218(11) TFUE.#Opinjoni mogħtija bis-saħħa tal-Artikolu 218(11) TFUE – Ftehim ta’ kummerċ ħieles bejn l-Unjoni Ewropea u r-Repubblika ta’ Singapor – Ftehim ‘ġenerazzjoni l-ġdida’ innegozjat wara d-dħul fis-seħħ tat-Trattati UE u FUE – Kompetenza sabiex jiġi konkluż il-ftehim – Artikolu 3(1)(e) TFUE – Politika kummerċjali komuni – Artikolu 207(1) TFUE – Kummerċ ta’ merkanzija u ta’ servizzi – Investiment barrani dirett – Kuntratti pubbliċi – Aspetti kummerċjali tal-proprjetà intellettwali – Kompetizzjoni – Kummerċ mal-Istati terzi u żvilupp sostenibbli – Protezzjoni soċjali tal-ħaddiema – Protezzjoni tal-ambjent – Artikolu 207(5) TFUE – Servizzi fil-qasam tat-trasport – Artikolu 3(2) TFUE – Ftehim internazzjonali li jista’ jaffettwa regoli komuni jew ibiddel il-portata tagħhom – Regoli ta’ dritt idderivat tal-Unjoni fil-qasam tal-libertà li jiġu pprovduti servizzi fil-qasam tat-trasport – Investiment barrani li ma huwiex dirett – Artikolu 216 TFUE – Ftehim meħtieġ sabiex jintlaħaq wieħed mill-għanijiet tat-Trattati – Moviment ħieles tal-kapital u tal-pagamenti bejn Stati Membri u Stati terzi – Suċċessjoni ta’ trattati fil-qasam tal-investiment – Sostituzzjoni ta’ ftehimiet ta’ investiment bejn Stati Membri u r-Repubblika ta’ Singapor – Dispożizzjonijiet istituzzjonali tal-ftehim – Riżoluzzjoni ta’ tilwim bejn investituri u Stati – Riżoluzzjoni ta’ tilwim bejn il-partijiet.#Opinjoni 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale E. Sharpston, presentate il 21 dicembre 2016.#Parere emesso ai sensi dell'articolo 218, paragrafo 11, TFUE.#Parere emesso ai sensi dell’articolo 218, paragrafo 11, TFUE – Accordo di libero scambio tra l’Unione europea e la Repubblica di Singapore – Accordo “di nuova generazione” negoziato dopo l’entrata in vigore dei Trattati UE e FUE – Competenza a concludere l’accordo – Articolo 3, paragrafo 1, lettera e), TFUE – Politica commerciale comune – Articolo 207, paragrafo 1, TFUE – Scambi di merci e di servizi – Investimenti esteri diretti – Appalti pubblici – Aspetti commerciali della proprietà intellettuale – Concorrenza – Commercio con gli Stati terzi e sviluppo sostenibile – Protezione sociale dei lavoratori – Tutela dell’ambiente – Articolo 207, paragrafo 5, TFUE – Servizi nel settore dei trasporti – Articolo 3, paragrafo 2, TFUE – Accordo internazionale che può incidere su norme comuni o modificarne la portata – Norme di diritto derivato dell’Unione in materia di libera prestazione dei servizi nel settore dei trasporti – Investimenti esteri diversi da quelli diretti – Articolo 216 TFUE – Accordo necessario per realizzare uno degli obiettivi dei Trattati – Libera circolazione dei capitali e dei pagamenti tra Stati membri e Stati terzi – Successione di trattati in materia di investimenti – Sostituzione degli accordi di investimento tra Stati membri e la Repubblica di Singapore – Disposizioni istituzionali dell’accordo – Risoluzione delle controversie tra investitori e Stati – Risoluzione delle controversie tra le Parti.#Parere 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Kohtujurist Sharpston, 21.12.2016 ettepanek.#ELTL artikli 218 lõike 11 alusel antud arvamus.#ELTL artikli 218 lõike 11 alusel antud arvamus – Vabakaubandusleping Euroopa Liidu ja Singapuri Vabariigi vahel – „Uue põlvkonna“ leping, mille üle peeti läbirääkimisi pärast ELi lepingu ja ELi toimimise lepingu jõustumist – Pädevus sõlmida leping – ELTL artikli 3 lõike 1 punkt e – Ühine kaubanduspoliitika – ELTL artikli 207 lõige 1 – Kauba- ja teenustevahetus – Välismaised otseinvesteeringud – Riigihanked – Intellektuaalomandi kaubandusaspektid – Konkurents – Kaubandus kolmandate riikidega ja kestlik areng – Töötajate sotsiaalne kaitse – Keskkonnakaitse – ELTL artikli 207 lõige 5 – Teenused transpordi valdkonnas – ELTL artikli 3 lõige 2 – Rahvusvaheline leping, mis võib mõjutada ühiseeskirju või muuta nende reguleerimisala – Transpordi valdkonnas teenuste osutamise vabadust käsitlevad liidu teisesed õigusnormid – Muud välisinvesteeringud peale otseinvesteeringute – ELTL artikkel 216 – Leping, mis on vajalik mõne aluslepingutes seatud eesmärgi saavutamiseks – Kapitali ja maksete vaba liikumine liikmesriikide ja kolmandate riikide vahel – Järjestikused investeerimislepingud – Investeerimislepingute asendamine liikmesriikide ja Singapuri Vabariigi vahel – Lepingu institutsioonilised sätted – Vaidluste lahendamine investorite ja riikide vahel – Vaidluste lahendamine lepinguosaliste vahel.#Arvamus 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sklepni predlogi generalne pravobranilke E. Sharpston, predstavljeni 21. decembra 2016.#Mnenje, izdano na podlagi člena 218(11) PDEU.#Mnenje, izdano na podlagi člena 218(11) PDEU – Sporazum o prosti trgovini med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Singapur – Sporazum ,nove generacije‘, o katerem so pogajanja potekala po začetku veljavnosti Pogodb EU in DEU – Pristojnost za sklenitev sporazuma – Člen 3(1)(e) PDEU – Skupna trgovinska politika – Člen 207(1) PDEU – Trgovina z blagom in storitvami – Tuje neposredne naložbe – Javna naročila – Trgovinski vidiki intelektualne lastnine – Konkurenca – Trgovina s tretjimi državami in trajnostni razvoj – Socialno varstvo delavcev – Varstvo okolja – Člen 207(5) PDEU – Storitve na področju prevoza – Člen 3(2) PDEU – Mednarodni sporazum, ki lahko vpliva na skupna pravila ali spremeni njihovo področje uporabe – Pravila sekundarnega prava Unije na področju svobode opravljanja storitev na področju prometa – Tuje naložbe, ki niso neposredne – Člen 216 PDEU – Sporazum, potreben za uresničitev enega od ciljev Pogodb – Prost pretok kapitala in plačil med državami članicami in tretjimi državami – Nasledstvo pogodb na področju naložb – Nadomestitev sporazumov o naložbah med državami članicami in Republiko Singapur – Institucionalne določbe sporazuma – Reševanje sporov med vlagatelji in državo – Reševanje sporov med pogodbenicama.#Mnenje 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Opinia rzecznik generalnej E. Sharpston przedstawiona w dniu 21 grudnia 2016 r.#Opinia wydana na podstawie art. 218 ust. 11 TFUE.#Opinia wydana na podstawie art. 218 ust. 11 TFUE – Umowa o wolnym handlu między Unią Europejską a Republiką Singapuru – Umowa handlowa „nowej generacji” wynegocjowana po wejściu w życie traktatów UE i FUE – Kompetencja do zawarcia umowy – Artykuł 3 ust. 1 lit. e) TFUE – Wspólna polityka handlowa – Artykuł 207 ust. 1 TFUE – Handel towarami i usługami – Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne – Zamówienia publiczne – Aspekty handlowe własności intelektualnej – Konkurencja – Handel z państwami trzecimi i zrównoważony rozwój – Ochrona socjalna pracowników – Ochrona środowiska naturalnego – Artykuł 207 ust. 5 TFUE – Usługi w dziedzinie transportu – Artykuł 3 ust. 2 TFUE – Umowa międzynarodowa mogąca naruszyć wspólne zasady lub zmienić ich zakres – Akty prawa wtórnego Unii obowiązujące w dziedzinie swobodnego świadczenia usług w dziedzinie transportu – Inwestycje inne, niż bezpośrednie – Artykuł 216 TFUE – Umowa konieczna do celów realizacji jednego z celów traktatu – Swobodny przepływ kapitału i płatności między państwami członkowskimi a państwami trzecimi – Następowanie po sobie umów dotyczących inwestycji – Zastąpienie umów inwestycyjnych między państwami członkowskimi a Republiką Singapuru – Postanowienia instytucjonalne umowy – Rozstrzyganie sporów między inwestorami a państwami – Rozstrzyganie sporów między stronami.#Opinia 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusões da advogada-geral E. Sharpston apresentadas em 21 de dezembro de 2016.#Parecer proferido nos termos do artigo 218.°, n.° 11, TFUE.#Parecer proferido nos termos do artigo 218.°, n.° 11, TFUE — Acordo de Comércio Livre entre a União Europeia e a República de Singapura — Acordo “nova geração” negociado após a entrada em vigor dos Tratados UE e FUE — Competência para celebrar o acordo — Artigo 3.°, n.° 1, alínea e), TFUE — Política comercial comum — Artigo 207.°, n.° 1, TFUE — Comércio de mercadorias e serviços — Investimentos estrangeiros diretos — Contratos públicos — Aspetos comerciais da propriedade intelectual — Concorrência — Comércio com os Estados terceiros e desenvolvimento sustentável — Proteção social dos trabalhadores — Proteção do ambiente — Artigo 207.°, n.° 5, TFUE — Serviços no domínio dos transportes — Artigo 3.°, n.° 2, TFUE — Acordo internacional suscetível de afetar regras comuns ou de alterar o seu alcance — Regras de direito derivado da União em matéria de livre prestação de serviços no domínio dos transportes — Investimentos estrangeiros diferentes de investimentos diretos — Artigo 216.° TFUE — Acordo necessário para alcançar um dos objetivos dos Tratados — Livre circulação de capitais e de pagamentos entre Estados‑Membros e Estados terceiros — Sucessão de tratados em matéria de investimento — Substituição dos acordos de investimento entre os Estados‑Membros e a República de Singapura — Disposições institucionais do acordo — Resolução de litígios entre investidores e o Estado — Resolução de litígios entre as Partes.#Parecer 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusie van advocaat-generaal E. Sharpston van 21 december 2016.#Advies krachtens artikel 218, lid 11, VWEU.#Advies krachtens artikel 218, lid 11, VWEU – Vrijhandelsovereenkomst tussen de Europese Unie en de Republiek Singapore – ‚Nieuw type’ overeenkomst waarover na de inwerkingtreding van het VEU en het VWEU is onderhandeld – Bevoegdheid tot sluiting van de overeenkomst – Artikel 3, lid 1, onder e), VWEU – Gemeenschappelijke handelspolitiek – Artikel 207, lid 1, VWEU – Handel in goederen en diensten – Directe buitenlandse investeringen – Overheidsopdrachten – Handelsaspecten van intellectuele eigendom – Mededinging – Handel met derde landen en duurzame ontwikkeling – Sociale bescherming van werknemers – Milieubescherming – Artikel 207, lid 5, VWEU – Diensten op het gebied van vervoer – Artikel 3, lid 2, VWEU – Internationale overeenkomst die gemeenschappelijke regels kan aantasten of de strekking daarvan kan wijzigen – Regels van afgeleid Unierecht inzake het vrij verrichten van vervoersdiensten – Andere dan directe buitenlandse investeringen – Artikel 216 VWEU – Overeenkomst die noodzakelijk is ter verwezenlijking van een van de doelstellingen van de Verdragen – Vrij kapitaal‑ en betalingsverkeer tussen lidstaten en derde staten – Opeenvolging van verdragen inzake investeringen – Vervanging van de investeringsovereenkomsten tussen lidstaten en de Republiek Singapore – Institutionele bepalingen van de overeenkomst – Beslechting van geschillen tussen investeerders en staten – Beslechting van geschillen tussen de partijen.#Advies 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Mišljenje nezavisne odvjetnice E. Sharpston od 21. prosinca 2016.#Mišljenje na temelju članka 218. stavka 11. UFEU-a.#Mišljenje na temelju članka 218. stavka 11. UFEU-a – Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Europske unije i Republike Singapura – Sporazum ‚nove generacije’ o kojem se pregovaralo nakon stupanja na snagu UEU-a i UFEU-a – Nadležnost za sklapanje sporazuma – Članak 3. stavak 1. točka (e) UFEU-a – Zajednička trgovinska politika – Članak 207. stavak 1. UFEU-a – Trgovina robom i uslugama – Izravna strana ulaganja – Javna nabava – Komercijalni aspekti intelektualnog vlasništva – Tržišno natjecanje – Trgovina s trećim zemljama i održivi razvoj – Socijalna zaštita radnika – Zaštita okoliša – Članak 207. stavak 5. UFEU-a – Usluge u području prometa – Članak 3. stavak 2. UFEU-a – Međunarodni sporazum koji može utjecati na zajednička pravila ili izmijeniti njihov opseg – Pravila sekundarnog prava Unije u području slobodnog pružanja usluga u području prometa – Strana ulaganja koja nisu izravna – Članak 216. UFEU-a – Sporazum nužan za ostvarivanje jednog od ciljeva iz Ugovorâ – Slobodno kretanje kapitala i platnog prometa između država članica i trećih zemalja – Sukcesija ugovora u području ulaganja – Zamjenjivanje sporazuma o ulaganjima između država članica i Republike Singapura – Institucionalne odredbe sporazuma – Rješavanje sporova između ulagača i država – Rješavanje sporova između stranaka.#Mišljenje 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Julkisasiamies E. Sharpstonin ratkaisuehdotus 21.12.2016.#SEUT 218 artiklan 11 kohdan nojalla annettu lausunto.#SEUT 218 artiklan 11 kohdan nojalla annettu lausunto — Euroopan unionin ja Singaporen tasavallan välinen vapaakauppasopimus — EU- ja EUT-sopimusten voimaantulon jälkeen neuvoteltu ”uuden sukupolven” sopimus — Toimivalta tehdä sopimus — SEUT 3 artiklan 1 kohdan e alakohta — Yhteinen kauppapolitiikka — SEUT 207 artiklan 1 kohta — Tavara- ja palvelukauppa — Ulkomaiset suorat sijoitukset — Julkiset hankinnat — Teollis- ja tekijänoikeuksien kaupalliset näkökohdat — Kilpailu — Kolmansien valtioiden kanssa käytävä kauppa ja kestävä kehitys — Työntekijöiden sosiaaliturva — Ympäristönsuojelu — SEUT 207 artiklan 5 kohta — Liikennepalvelut — SEUT 3 artiklan 2 kohta — Kansainvälinen sopimus, joka voi vaikuttaa yhteisiin sääntöihin tai muuttaa niiden ulottuvuutta — Liikenteen alan palveluiden tarjoamisen vapautta koskevat unionin johdetun oikeuden säännöt — Muut kuin suorat ulkomaiset sijoitukset — SEUT 216 artikla — Jonkin perustamissopimuksissa vahvistetun tavoitteen saavuttamiseksi välttämätön sopimus — Pääomien ja maksujen vapaa liikkuvuus jäsenvaltioiden ja kolmansien valtioiden välillä — Perussopimusten ajallinen seuraanto investointeja koskevissa asioissa — Jäsenvaltioiden ja Singaporen tasavallan välisten sijoitussopimusten korvaaminen — Sopimuksen institutionaaliset määräykset — Sijoittajan ja valtion välisten riitojen ratkaisu — Sopimuksen osapuolten välisten riitojen ratkaisu.#Lausunto 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin E. Sharpston vom 21. Dezember 2016.#Gutachten nach Art. 218 Abs. 11 AEUV.#Gutachten nach Art. 218 Abs. 11 AEUV – Freihandelsabkommen zwischen der Europäischen Union und der Republik Singapur – Handelsabkommen der ‚neuen Generation‘, das nach Inkrafttreten des EU- und des AEU-Vertrags verhandelt wurde – Zuständigkeit für den Abschluss des Abkommens – Art. 3 Abs. 1 Buchst. e AEUV – Gemeinsame Handelspolitik – Art. 207 Abs. 1 AEUV – Handel mit Waren und Dienstleistungen – Ausländische Direktinvestitionen – Öffentliches Beschaffungswesen – Handelsaspekte des geistigen Eigentums – Wettbewerb – Handel mit Drittstaaten und nachhaltige Entwicklung – Sozialer Schutz der Arbeitnehmer – Umweltschutz – Art. 207 Abs. 5 AEUV – Dienstleistungen im Bereich des Verkehrs – Art. 3 Abs. 2 AEUV – Internationale Übereinkunft, die gemeinsame Regeln beeinträchtigen oder deren Tragweite verändern könnte – Regeln des abgeleiteten Rechts der Union über den freien Dienstleistungsverkehr im Bereich des Verkehrs – Andere ausländische Investitionen als Direktinvestitionen – Art. 216 AEUV – Zur Verwirklichung eines der in den Verträgen festgesetzten Ziele erforderliche Übereinkunft – Freier Kapital- und Zahlungsverkehr zwischen Mitgliedstaaten und Drittstaaten – Aufeinanderfolgen von Investitionsabkommen – Ersetzung von Investitionsabkommen zwischen Mitgliedstaaten und der Republik Singapur – Organisatorische Bestimmungen des Abkommens – Beilegung von Streitigkeiten zwischen Investoren und Staaten – Beilegung von Streitigkeiten zwischen den Vertragsparteien.#Rechtssache Gutachten 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusiones de la Abogado General Sra. E. Sharpston, presentadas el 21 de diciembre de 2016.#Dictamen emitido con arreglo al artículo 218 TFUE, apartado 11.#Dictamen emitido con arreglo al artículo 218 TFUE, apartado 11 — Acuerdo de Libre Comercio entre la Unión Europea y la República de Singapur — Acuerdo “de nueva generación” negociado después de la entrada en vigor de los Tratados UE y FUE — Competencia para celebrar el Acuerdo — Artículo 3 TFUE, apartado 1, letra e) — Política comercial común — Artículo 207 TFUE, apartado 1 — Comercio de mercancías y de servicios — Inversiones extranjeras directas — Contratación pública — Aspectos comerciales de la propiedad intelectual e industrial — Competencia — Comercio con los terceros Estados y desarrollo sostenible — Protección social de los trabajadores — Protección del medio ambiente — Artículo 207 TFUE, apartado 5 — Servicios en el ámbito de los transportes — Artículo 3 TFUE, apartado 2 — Acuerdo internacional que puede afectar a normas comunes o alterar el alcance de las mismas — Normas de Derecho derivado de la Unión en materia de libre prestación de servicios en el ámbito de los transportes — Inversiones extranjeras distintas de las directas — Artículo 216 TFUE — Acuerdo necesario para alcanzar alguno de los objetivos de los Tratados — Libre circulación de capitales y de pagos entre Estados miembros y terceros Estados — Sucesión de tratados en materia de inversiones — Sustitución de acuerdos de inversión entre Estados miembros y la República de Singapur — Disposiciones institucionales del Acuerdo — Solución de diferencias entre inversores y Estados — Solución de diferencias entre las Partes.#Dictamen 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat E. Sharpston föredraget den 21 december 2016.#Yttrande enligt artikel 218.11 FEUF.#Yttrande som avges enligt artikel 218.11 FEUF – Frihandelsavtal mellan Europeiska unionen och Republiken Singapore – 'Nya generationens’ avtal, framförhandlat efter det att EU- och EUF-fördragen trätt i kraft – Befogenhet att ingå avtalet – Artikel 3.1 e FEUF – Gemensam handelspolitik – Artikel 207.1 FEUF – Handel med varor och tjänster – Utländska direktinvesteringar – Offentlig upphandling – Handelsrelaterade aspekter av immateriella rättigheter – Konkurrens – Handel med tredjeländer och hållbar utveckling – Socialt skydd för arbetstagare – Miljöskydd – Artikel 207.5 FEUF – Tjänster på transportområdet – Artikel 3.2 FEUF – Internationellt avtal som kan påverka gemensamma regler eller ändra räckvidden för dessa – Sekundärrättsliga unionsbestämmelser om frihet att tillhandahålla tjänster på transportområdet – Andra utländska investeringar än direktinvesteringar – Artikel 216 FEUF – Avtal som är nödvändigt för att uppnå ett av fördragens mål – Fri rörlighet för kapital och betalningar mellan medlemsstater och tredjeländer – Fördragssuccession på investeringsområdet – Investeringsavtalen mellan medlemsstaterna och Republiken Singapore ersätts – Institutionella bestämmelser i avtalet – Tvistlösning mellan investerare och stater – Tvistlösning mellan parterna.#Yttrande 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ģenerāladvokātes E. Šarpstones [E. Sharpston] secinājumi, 2016. gada 21. decembris.#Atzinums, kas sniegts saskaņā ar LESD 218. panta 11. punktu.#Atzinums, kas sniegts saskaņā ar LESD 218. panta 11. punktu – Brīvās tirdzniecības nolīgums starp Eiropas Savienību un Singapūras Republiku – “Jaunās paaudzes” nolīgums, kas apspriests pēc LES un LESD stāšanās spēkā – Kompetence noslēgt nolīgumu – LESD 3. panta 1. punkta e) apakšpunkts – Kopējā tirdzniecības politika – LESD 207. panta 1. punkts – Preču un pakalpojumu tirdzniecība – Ārvalstu tiešie ieguldījumi – Publiski līgumi – Intelektuālā īpašuma komerciālie aspekti – Konkurence – Tirdzniecība ar trešajām valstīm un ilgtspējīga attīstība – Darba ņēmēju sociālā aizsardzība – Vides aizsardzība – LESD 207. panta 5. punkts – Pakalpojumi transporta jomā – LESD 3. panta 2. punkts – Starptautisks nolīgums, kas var ietekmēt kopīgos noteikumus vai mainīt to darbības jomu – Savienības atvasināto tiesību noteikumi par pakalpojumu sniegšanas brīvību transporta jomā – Ārvalstu ieguldījumi, kas nav tiešie ieguldījumi – LESD 216. pants – Nolīgums, kas ir vajadzīgs, lai īstenotu vienu no Līgumu mērķiem – Kapitāla un maksājumu brīva aprite starp dalībvalstīm un trešajām valstīm – Līgumu ieguldījumu jomā pēctecība – Ieguldījumu līgumu, kas noslēgti starp dalībvalstīm un Singapūras Republiku, aizstāšana – Nolīguma institucionālie noteikumi – Ieguldītāja un valsts strīdu izšķiršana – Pušu strīdu izšķiršana.#Atzinums 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• E. Sharpston főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2016. december 21.#Az EUMSZ 218. cikk (11) bekezdése alapján adott vélemény.#Az EUMSZ 218. cikk (11) bekezdése alapján adott vélemény – Az Európai Unió és a Szingapúri Köztársaság közötti szabadkereskedelmi megállapodás – Az EU‑ és az EUM‑Szerződés hatálybalépését követően tárgyalt, »új generációs« kereskedelmi megállapodás – A megállapodás megkötésére vonatkozó hatáskör – Az EUMSZ 3. cikk (1) bekezdésének e) pontja – Közös kereskedelempolitika – Az EUMSZ 207. cikk (1) bekezdése – Áru‑ és szolgáltatáskereskedelem – Külföldi közvetlen befektetések – Közbeszerzések – A szellemi tulajdonjogok kereskedelmi vonatkozásai – Verseny – Harmadik államokkal folytatott kereskedelem és fenntartható fejlődés – A munkavállalók szociális védelme – Környezetvédelem – Az EUMSZ 207. cikk (5) bekezdése – A közlekedés területén nyújtott szolgáltatások – Az EUMSZ 3. cikk (2) bekezdése – Olyan nemzetközi megállapodás, amely érintheti a közös szabályokat vagy azok alkalmazási körét megváltoztathatja – A szállítási szolgáltatások szabad nyújtására vonatkozó másodlagos uniós jogszabályok – Nem közvetlen külföldi befektetések – EUMSZ 216. cikk – A Szerződések egyik célkitűzésének megvalósításához szükséges megállapodás – A tagállamok és a harmadik államok közötti tőkemozgás és fizetési műveletek szabadsága – A Szerződések egymás felváltó rendszere a befektetések területén – Az egyes tagállamok és a Szingapúri Köztársaság közötti befektetési megállapodások felváltása – A megállapodás intézményi rendelkezései – A befektetők és az államok közötti vitarendezés – A felek közötti vitarendezés.#2/15. sz. vélemény.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Заключение на генералния адвокат E. Sharpston, представено на 21 декември 2016 г.#Становище, постановено на основание член 218, параграф 11 ДФЕС.#Становище, постановено на основание член 218, параграф 11 ДФЕС — Споразумение за свободна търговия между Европейския съюз и Република Сингапур — Споразумение от „ново поколение“, договорено след влизането в сила на Договорите за ЕС и за функционирането на ЕС — Компетентност за сключване на споразумението — Член 3, параграф 1, буква д) ДФЕС — Обща търговска политика — Член 207, параграф 1 ДФЕС — Търговия със стоки и услуги — Преки чуждестранни инвестиции — Обществени поръчки — Търговски аспекти на интелектуалната собственост — Конкуренция — Търговия с трети държави и устойчиво развитие — Социална закрила на работниците — Опазване на околната среда — Член 207, параграф 5 ДФЕС — Услуги в областта на транспорта — Член 3, параграф 2 ДФЕС — Международно споразумение, което може да засегне общите правила или да промени техния обхват — Вторично законодателство на Съюза в областта на свободното предоставяне на услуги в транспорта — Чуждестранни инвестиции, които не са преки — Член 216 ДФЕС — Споразумение, необходимо за осъществяване на някоя от целите по Договорите — Свободно движение на капитали и плащания между държави членки и трети държави — Правоприемство по договори в областта на инвестициите — Заместване на инвестиционните споразумения между държавите членки и Република Сингапур — Институционални разпоредби на споразумението — Уреждане на спорове между инвеститори и държави — Уреждане на спорове между страните.#Становище 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat E. Sharpston fremsat den 21. december 2016.#Udtalelse afgivet i medfør af artikel 218, stk. 11, TEUF.#Udtalelse afgivet i medfør af artikel 218, stk. 11, TEUF – frihandelsaftale mellem Den Europæiske Union og Singapore – aftale »af den nye generation«, der er forhandlet efter EU-traktatens og EUF-traktatens ikrafttrædelse – kompetence til at indgå aftalen – artikel 3, stk. 1, litra e), TEUF – fælles handelspolitik – artikel 207, stk. 1, TEUF – handel med varer og tjenesteydelser – direkte udenlandske investeringer – offentlige kontrakter – handelsrelaterede aspekter af intellektuel ejendomsret – konkurrence – handel med tredjelande og bæredygtig udvikling – social beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne – miljøbeskyttelse – artikel 207, stk. 5, TEUF – tjenesteydelser på transportområdet – artikel 3, stk. 2, TEUF – international aftale, der kan berøre fælles regler eller ændre deres rækkevidde – regler i den afledte EU-ret på området for den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser på transportområdet – udenlandske investeringer, der ikke er direkte – artikel 216 TEUF – aftale, der er nødvendig for at opfylde et af målene med traktaterne – fri bevægelighed for kapital og betalinger mellem medlemsstater og tredjelande – succession af traktater på investeringsområdet – erstatning af investeringsaftalerne mellem medlemsstaterne og Republikken Singapore – aftalens institutionelle bestemmelser – tvistbilæggelse mellem investorer og stater – tvistbilæggelse mellem parterne.#Udtalelse 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Stanovisko generální advokátky E. Sharpston přednesené dne 21. prosince 2016.#Posudek vydaný na základě čl. 218 odst. 11 SFEU.#Posudek vydaný na základě čl. 218 odst. 11 SFEU – Dohoda o volném obchodu mezi Evropskou unií a Singapurskou republikou – Dohoda ‚nové generace‘ sjednaná po vstupu Smluv o EU a FEU v platnost – Pravomoc uzavřít dohodu – Článek 3 odst. 1 písm. e) SFEU – Společná obchodní politika – Článek 207 odst. 1 SFEU – Obchod zbožím a službami – Přímé zahraniční investice – Veřejné zakázky – Obchodní aspekty duševního vlastnictví – Hospodářská soutěž – Obchod s třetími státy a udržitelný rozvoj – Sociální ochrana pracovníků – Ochrana životního prostředí – Článek 207 odst. 5 SFEU – Služby v oblasti dopravy – Článek 3 odst. 2 SFEU – Mezinárodní dohoda, která může ovlivnit společná pravidla či změnit jejich působnost – Pravidla sekundárního práva Unie týkající se volného pohybu služeb v oblasti dopravy – Jiné než přímé zahraniční investice – Článek 216 SFEU – Dohoda nezbytná k dosažení cíle stanoveného Smlouvami – Volný pohyb kapitálu a plateb mezi členskými státy a třetími státy – Posloupnost smluv v oblasti investic – Nahrazení smluv o investicích mezi členskými státy a Singapurskou republikou – Institucionální ustanovení dohody – Řešení sporů mezi investory a státy – Řešení sporů mezi smluvními stranami.#Věc Avis 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Návrhy prednesené 21. decembra 2016 – generálna advokátka E. Sharpston.#Stanovisko vydané podľa článku 218 ods. 11 ZFEÚ.#Stanovisko vydané podľa článku 218 ods. 11 ZFEÚ – Dohoda o voľnom obchode medzi Európskou úniou a Singapurskou republikou – Dohoda ‚novej generácie‘ dojednaná po nadobudnutí platnosti Zmlúv o EÚ a o FEÚ – Právomoci na uzavretie dohody – Článok 3 ods. 1 písm. e) ZFEÚ – Spoločná obchodná politika – Článok 207 ods. 1 ZFEÚ – Obchod s tovarom a službami – Rôzne zahraničné investície – Verejné zákazky – Obchodné aspekty duševného vlastníctva – Hospodárska súťaž – Obchod s tretími štátmi a trvalo udržateľný rozvoj – Sociálna ochrana pracovníkov – Ochrana životného prostredia – Článok 207 ods. 5 ZFEÚ – Služby v oblasti dopravy – Článok 3 ods. 2 ZFEÚ – Medzinárodná zmluva, ktorou môžu byť dotknuté spoločné pravidlá alebo pozmenený rozsah ich pôsobnosti – Predpisy sekundárneho práva Únie v oblasti slobodného poskytovania dopravných služieb – Iné než priame zahraničné investície – Článok 216 ZFEÚ – Dohoda potrebná na dosiahnutie jedného z cieľov stanovených Zmluvami – Voľný pohyb kapitálu a platieb medzi členskými štátmi a tretími štátmi – Postupnosť zmlúv v oblasti investícií – Nahradenie zmlúv v oblasti investícií medzi členskými štátmi a Singapurskou republikou – Inštitucionálne ustanovenia dohody – Urovnávanie sporov medzi investorom a štátom – Urovnávanie sporov medzi zmluvnými stranami.#Stanovisko 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  judgment · 21 December 2016 · Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 December 2016.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore — ‘New generation’ trade agreement negotiated after the entry into force of the EU and FEU Treaties — Competence to conclude the agreement — Article 3(1)(e) TFEU — Common commercial policy — Article 207(1) TFEU — Trade in goods and services — Foreign direct investment — Public procurement — Commercial aspects of intellectual property — Competition — Trade with third States and sustainable development — Social protection of workers — Environmental protection — Article 207(5) TFEU — Services in the field of transport — Article 3(2) TFEU — International agreement which may affect common rules or alter their scope — Rules of secondary EU law concerning freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Non-direct foreign investment — Article 216 TFEU — Agreement necessary in order to achieve one of the objectives of the Treaties — Free movement of capital and of payments between Member States and third States — Succession of treaties concerning investment — Replacement of the investment agreements between Member States and the Republic of Singapore — Institutional provisions of the agreement — Investor-State dispute settlement — Dispute settlement between the Parties.#Opinion 2/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Antwoord op vragen van de leden Voortman en Grashoff over het arrest van het Europees Hof van Justitie inzake het achterhouden van milieu-informatie in het kader van bedrijfsbelang

  Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · 20 December 2016 · Het arrest van het Europees Hof van Justitie inzake het achterhouden van milieu-informatie in het kader van bedrijfsbelang

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Verzoek om geen onomkeerbare stappen te zetten met de wijziging van het Besluit milieueffectrapportage

  Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · 20 December 2016 · Ontwerpbesluit tot wijziging van het Besluit milieueffectrapportage (implementatie herziening mer-richtlijn)

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Üldkohtu (viies koda) 15. detsembri 2016. aasta otsus.#TestBioTech eV jt versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Keskkond – Geneetiliselt muundatud tooted – Geneetiliselt muundatud sojauba MON 87701 x MON 89788 – Toote turule lubamise otsuse peale esitatud vaide rahuldamata jätmine põhjendamatuse tõttu – Põhjendamiskohustus – Ilmne hindamisviga.#Kohtuasi T-177/13.

  judgment · 15 December 2016 · Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2016.#TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment — Genetically modified products — Genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 — Request for internal review of the decision on marketing authorisation dismissed as unfounded — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-177/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 15. Dezember 2016.#TestBioTech e.V. u. a. gegen Europäische Kommission.#Umwelt – Genetisch veränderte Erzeugnisse – Genetisch veränderte Sojabohnen der Sorte MON 87701 × MON 89788 – Ablehnung eines Antrags auf interne Überprüfung des Beschlusses über die Zulassung des Inverkehrbringens als unbegründet – Begründungspflicht – Offensichtlicher Beurteilungsfehler.#Rechtssache T-177/13.

  judgment · 15 December 2016 · Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2016.#TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment — Genetically modified products — Genetically modified soybean MON 87701 x MON 89788 — Request for internal review of the decision on marketing authorisation dismissed as unfounded — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-177/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source