Environment

Records

Documents

Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.

• Ontwerpbesluit houdende technische wijzigingen van enkele algemene maatregelen van bestuur op het terrein van milieu, vervoer en water

  Brief regering · 21 December 2017 · Ontwerpbesluit houdende technische wijzigingen van enkele algemene maatregelen van bestuur op het terrein van milieu, vervoer en water

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Eindtekst 34845 XII

  Eindtekst · 20 December 2017 · Wijziging van de begrotingsstaten van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu (XII) voor het jaar 2017 (wijziging samenhangende met de Najaarsnota)

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 20 décembre 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation contre Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2000/60/CE – Politique de l’Union européenne dans le domaine de l’eau – Article 4, paragraphe 1, et article 14, paragraphe 1 – Obligations de prévenir la détérioration de l’état des masses d’eau et d’encourager la participation active de toutes les parties concernées à la mise en œuvre de la directive – Convention d’Aarhus – Participation du public au processus décisionnel et accès à la justice en matière d’environnement – Article 6 et article 9, paragraphes 3 et 4 – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 47 – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Projet susceptible d’avoir des incidences sur l’état des eaux – Procédure administrative d’autorisation – Organisation de défense de l’environnement – Demande tendant à obtenir la qualité de partie à la procédure administrative – Possibilité d’invoquer des droits tirés de la directive 2000/60/CE – Forclusion de la qualité de partie à la procédure et du droit de recours en cas d’absence d’invocation desdits droits en temps utile au cours de la procédure administrative.#Affaire C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2017. december 20.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation kontra Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#A Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Ausztria) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – 2000/60/EK irányelv – Európai uniós vízpolitika – A 4. cikk (1) bekezdése és a 14. cikk (1) bekezdése – A víztestek állapotromlásának megelőzésére és valamennyi érintett félnek az irányelv végrehajtásában történő részvételére való ösztönzésre vonatkozó kötelezettségek – Aarhusi Egyezmény – A nyilvánosságnak a döntéshozatalban történő részvétele és az igazságszolgáltatáshoz való jog biztosítása a környezeti ügyekben – A 6. cikk, valamint a 9. cikk (3) és (4) bekezdése – Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája – 47. cikk – A hatékony bírói jogvédelemhez való jog – A vizek állapotára esetlegesen kihatással járó projekt – Közigazgatási engedélyezési eljárás – Környezetvédelmi szervezet – A közigazgatási eljárásban részt vevő ügyfél jogállásának elismerése iránti kérelem – A 2000/60/EK irányelvre alapított jogokra való hivatkozás lehetősége – Az eljárásban részt vevő ügyféli jogállás, illetve a keresetindítási jog elveszítése olyan esetben, amikor az említett jogokra nem hivatkoznak kellő időn belül a közigazgatási eljárásban.#C-664/15. sz. ügy.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 20 декември 2017 г.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation срещу Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Директива 2000/60/EО — Политика на Европейския съюз в областта на водите — Член 4, параграф 1 и член 14, параграф 1 — Задължение за предпазване от влошаване на състоянието на водните обекти и за насърчаване на активното участие на всички заинтересовани страни в прилагането на директивата — Орхуска конвенция — Участие на обществеността в процеса на вземане на решения и достъпа до правосъдие по въпроси на околната среда — Член 6 и член 9, параграфи 3 и 4 — Харта на основните права на Европейския съюз — Член 47 — Право на ефективна съдебна защита — Проект, който може да окаже въздействие върху състоянието на водите — Административно производство по издаване на разрешение — Организация за опазване на околната среда — Искане за получаването на качеството на страна в административното производство — Възможност за позоваване на права, изведени от Директива 2000/60/EО — Преклудиране на качеството страна в производството и на правото на обжалване при липса на своевременно позоваване на посочените права в рамките на административното производство.#Дело C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tal-20 ta’ Diċembru 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation vs Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Direttiva 2000/60/KE – Politika tal-Unjoni Ewropea fil-qasam tal-ilma – Artikolu 4(1) u Artikolu 14(1) – Obbligi ta’ prevenzjoni tad-deterjorazzjoni tal-istat tal-korpi tal-ilma u li tiġi nkoraġġuta l-parteċipazzjoni attiva tal-partijiet kollha kkonċernati fl-implementazzjoni tad-direttiva – Konvenzjoni ta’ Aarhus – Parteċipazzjoni pubblika fil-proċess deċiżjonali u aċċess għall-ġustizzja f’materji ambjentali – Artikolu 6 u Artikolu 9(3) u (4) – Karta tad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Artikolu 47 – Dritt għal protezzjoni ġudizzjarja effettiva – Proġett li jista’ jaffettwa l-istat tal-ilma – Proċedura amministrattiva għal awtorizzazzjoni – Organizzazzjoni għall-protezzjoni tal-ambjent – Talba sabiex tinkiseb il-kwalità ta’ parti fil-proċedura amministrattiva – Possibbiltà li jiġu invokati drittijiet misluta mid-Direttiva 2000/60/KE – Dekadenza tal-kwalità ta’ parti fil-proċedura u tad-dritt għal azzjoni legali fil-każ li ma jiġux invokati l-imsemmija drittijiet fi żmien xieraq matul il-proċedura amministrattiva.#Kawża C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 20 grudnia 2017 r.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation przeciwko Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Dyrektywa 2000/60/WE – Polityka Unii w dziedzinie gospodarki wodnej – Artykuł 4 ust. 1 i art. 14 ust. 1 – Obowiązek zapobiegania pogarszaniu się stanu części wód i zachęcania wszystkich zainteresowanych stron do aktywnego udziału we wdrażaniu dyrektywy – Konwencja z Aarhus – Udział społeczeństwa w podejmowaniu decyzji oraz dostęp do wymiaru sprawiedliwości w sprawach dotyczących środowiska – Artykuł 6 i art. 9 ust. 3 i 4 – Karta praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Artykuł 47 – Prawo do skutecznej ochrony sądowej – Przedsięwzięcie, które może wywierać wpływ na stan wód – Postępowanie administracyjne w przedmiocie wydania pozwolenia – Organizacja ochrony środowiska – Wniosek o uznanie charakteru strony postępowania administracyjnego – Możliwość powołania się na prawa wynikające z dyrektywy 2000/60/WE – Utrata statusu strony postępowania i prawa do wniesienia skargi w wypadku brak powołania się na te prawa we właściwym czasie w toku postępowania administracyjnego.#Sprawa C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 20 de diciembre de 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation contra Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Directiva 2000/60/CE — Política de aguas de la Unión Europea — Artículo 4, apartado 1, y artículo 14, apartado 1 — Obligación de prevenir el deterioro del estado de las masas de agua y de fomentar la participación activa de todas las partes interesadas en la aplicación de la Directiva — Convenio de Aarhus — Participación del público en la toma de decisiones y acceso a la justicia en materia de medio ambiente — Artículo 6 y artículo 9, apartados 3 y 4 — Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea — Artículo 47 — Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva — Proyecto que puede tener repercusiones en el estado de las aguas — Procedimiento administrativo de autorización — Organización de defensa del medio ambiente — Solicitud de reconocimiento de la condición de parte en el procedimiento administrativo — Posibilidad de invocar derechos derivados de la Directiva 2000/60/CE — Pérdida de la condición de parte en el procedimiento y del derecho de recurso cuando tales derechos no hayan sido alegados en plazo en el procedimiento administrativo.#Asunto C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 20 dicembre 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation contro Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Ambiente – Direttiva 2000/60/CE – Politica dell’Unione europea in materia di acque – Articolo 4, paragrafo 1, e articolo 14, paragrafo 1 – Obblighi di impedire il deterioramento dello stato dei corpi idrici e di promuovere la partecipazione attiva di tutte le parti interessate all’attuazione della direttiva – Convenzione di Aarhus – Partecipazione del pubblico al processo decisionale e accesso alla giustizia in materia ambientale – Articolo 6 e articolo 9, paragrafi 3 e 4 – Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea – Articolo 47 – Diritto a una tutela giurisdizionale effettiva – Progetto che può avere un impatto sullo stato delle acque – Procedimento amministrativo di autorizzazione – Organizzazione per la tutela dell’ambiente – Domanda diretta a ottenere la qualità di parte nel procedimento amministrativo – Possibilità di far valere diritti conferiti dalla direttiva 2000/60/CE – Perdita della qualità di parte nel procedimento e del diritto di ricorso nel caso in cui tali diritti non siano stati fatti valere in tempo utile nel corso del procedimento amministrativo.#Causa C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 20.12.2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation vastaan Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Verwaltungsgerichtshofin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Direktiivi 2000/60/EY – Euroopan unionin politiikka vesialalla – 4 artiklan 1 kohta ja 14 artiklan 1 kohta – Velvollisuus ehkäistä vesimuodostumien tilan huononemista ja rohkaista kaikkien osapuolten aktiivista osallistumista direktiivin täytäntöönpanoon – Århusin yleissopimus – Yleisön osallistumisoikeus päätöksentekoon sekä muutoksenhaku- ja vireillepano-oikeus ympäristöasioissa – 6 artikla ja 9 artiklan 3 ja 4 kappale – Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja – 47 artikla – Oikeus tehokkaaseen oikeussuojaan – Hanke, jolla voi olla vaikutuksia vesien tilaan – Hallinnollinen lupamenettely – Ympäristönsuojelujärjestö – Pyyntö asianosaisaseman saamisesta hallinnollisessa menettelyssä – Mahdollisuus vedota direktiivistä 2000/60/EY johtuviin oikeuksiin – Asianosaisaseman ja kanneoikeuden menettäminen silloin, kun mainittuihin oikeuksiin ei ole vedottu määräajassa hallinnollisen menettelyn aikana.#Asia C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2017. gada 20. decembris.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation pret Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Verwaltungsgerichtshof lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Direktīva 2000/60/EK – Eiropas Savienības politika ūdens resursu jomā – 4. panta 1. punkts un 14. panta 1. punkts – Pienākums novērst ūdens objektu stāvokļa pasliktināšanos un veicināt visu ieinteresēto pušu efektīvu iesaisti direktīvas īstenošanā – Orhūsas konvencija – Sabiedrības dalība lēmumu pieņemšanā un iespēja vērsties tiesu iestādēs saistībā ar vides jautājumiem – 6. pants un 9. panta 3. un 4. punkts – Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību harta – 47. pants – Tiesības uz efektīvu tiesību aizsardzību tiesā – Projekts, kas var ietekmēt ūdens stāvokli – Administratīvais atļaujas piešķiršanas process – Vides aizsardzības organizācija – Pieteikums par administratīvā procesa dalībnieka statusa atzīšanu – Iespēja atsaukties uz tiesībām, kas izriet no Direktīvas 2000/60/EK – Procesa dalībnieka statusa un tiesību celt prasību zaudēšana, ja minētās tiesības administratīvā procesa laikā nav tikušas izvirzītas savlaicīgi.#Lieta C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 20. decembra 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation proti Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Direktiva 2000/60/ES – Vodna politika Evropske unije – Člena 4(1) in 14(1) – Obveznosti preprečevanja poslabšanja stanja vodnih teles in vzpodbujanja dejavnega vključevanja vseh zainteresiranih strani v izvajanje Direktive – Aarhuška konvencija – Udeležba javnosti pri odločanju in dostop do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah – Člena 6 ter 9(3) in (4) – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 47 – Pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva – Projekt, ki lahko vpliva na stanje voda – Upravni postopek za izdajo dovoljenja – Organizacija za varstvo okolja – Vloga za priznanje položaja stranke v upravnem postopku – Možnost sklicevanja na pravice iz Direktive 2000/60/ES – Izguba položaja stranke v upravnem postopku in pravice do pravnega sredstva v primeru prepoznega sklicevanja na navedene pravice v upravnem postopku.#Zadeva C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 20. prosince 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v. Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Směrnice 2000/60/ES – Činnost Evropské unie v oblasti vodní politiky – Článek 4 odst. 1 a čl. 14 odst. 1 – Povinnosti zamezit zhoršení stavu útvarů vod a podpořit aktivní zapojení všech zúčastněných stran při provádění směrnice – Aarhuská úmluva – Účast veřejnosti na rozhodování a přístup k právní ochraně v záležitostech životního prostředí – Článek 6 a čl. 9 odst. 3 a 4 – Listina základních práv Evropské unie – Článek 47 – Právo na účinnou soudní ochranu – Projekt, který může mít vliv na stav vod – Správní řízení o schválení – Organizace na ochranu životního prostředí – Návrh na přiznání postavení účastníka správního řízení – Možnost dovolávat se práv vycházejících ze směrnice 2000/60/ES – Zánik práva být účastníkem řízení a práva na prostředek právní nápravy, nejsou-li uvedená práva uplatněna v rámci správního řízení včas.#Věc C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 20 decembrie 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation împotriva Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Directiva 2000/60/CE – Politica Uniunii Europene în domeniul apei – Articolul 4 alineatul (1) și articolul 14 alineatul (1) – Obligațiile de a preveni deteriorarea stării corpurilor de apă și de a încuraja participarea activă a tuturor părților interesate la punerea în aplicare a directivei – Convenția de la Aarhus – Participarea publicului la luarea deciziilor și accesul la justiție în probleme de mediu – Articolul 6 și articolul 9 alineatele (3) și (4) – Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene – Articolul 47 – Dreptul la protecție jurisdicțională efectivă – Proiect susceptibil de a avea un impact asupra stării apelor – Procedură administrativă de autorizare – Organizație de protecție a mediului – Cerere care vizează obținerea calității de parte în procedura administrativă – Posibilitate de a invoca drepturi conferite de Directiva 2000/60/CE – Decădere din calitatea de parte în procedură și din dreptul la o cale de atac în cazul neinvocării drepturilor menționate în timp util în cursul procedurii administrative.#Cauza C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 20. prosinca 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation protiv Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Direktiva 2000/60/EZ – Politika Europske unije u području voda – Članak 4. stavak 1. i članak 14. stavak 1. – Obveza sprečavanja pogoršanja stanja vodnih tijela i poticanja aktivnog sudjelovanja svih zainteresiranih strana u provedbi direktive – Arhuška konvencija – Sudjelovanje javnosti u odlučivanju i pristup pravosuđu u pitanjima okoliša – Članak 6. i članak 9. stavci 3. i 4. – Povelja Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Članak 47. – Pravo na djelotvornu sudsku zaštitu – Projekt koji može imati utjecaj na stanje voda – Upravni postupak odobrenja – Organizacija za zaštitu okoliša – Zahtjev za priznavanje statusa stranke u upravnom postupku – Mogućnost pozivanja na prava izvedena iz Direktive 2000/60/EZ – Prekluzija statusa stranke u postupku i prava na pravni lijek u slučaju izostanka pravodobnog pozivanja na navedena prava tijekom upravnog postupka.#Predmet C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 20.12.2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation versus Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Direktiiv 2000/60/EÜ – Euroopa Liidu veepoliitika – Artikli 4 lõige 1 ja artikli 14 lõige 1 – Kohustus vältida veekogude seisundi halvenemist ja soodustada kõigi huvitatud poolte aktiivset osalemist direktiivi rakendamises – Århusi konventsioon – Üldsuse osalemine keskkonnaasjade otsustamises ja õigus neis asjus kohtu poole pöörduda – Artikkel 6 ja artikli 9 lõiked 3 ja 4 – Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta – Artikkel 47 – Õigus tõhusale kohtulikule kaitsele – Projekt, millel võib olla mõju vee seisundile – Haldusmenetlus projektile loa andmiseks – Keskkonnakaitseorganisatsioon – Nõue haldusmenetluses menetluspoole staatuse saamiseks – Võimalus tugineda direktiivist 2000/60/EÜ tulenevatele õigustele – Menetluspoole staatuse ja kaebeõiguse välistamine juhul kui nimetatud õigustele ei ole haldusmenetluses õigel ajal tuginetud.#Kohtuasi C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 20 december 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation tegen Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Verzoek van het Verwaltungsgerichtshof om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Richtlijn 2000/60/EG – Waterbeleid van de Europese Unie – Artikel 4, lid 1, en artikel 14, lid 1 – Verplichtingen om de achteruitgang van de toestand van de waterlichamen te voorkomen en de actieve deelneming van alle betrokkenen bij de uitvoering van de richtlijn aan te moedigen – Verdrag van Aarhus – Inspraak van het publiek in de besluitvorming inzake milieuaangelegenheden en toegang tot de rechter – Artikel 6 en artikel 9, leden 3 en 4 – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 47 – Recht op effectieve rechterlijke bescherming – Project dat gevolgen kan hebben voor de toestand van de waterlichamen – Bestuurlijke vergunningprocedure – Milieuorganisatie – Verzoek tot verkrijging van de hoedanigheid van partij in de bestuurlijke procedure – Mogelijkheid om een beroep te doen op de aan richtlijn 2000/60/EG ontleende rechten – Verlies van de hoedanigheid van partij in de procedure en van het recht van beroep indien die rechten in de loop van de bestuurlijke procedure niet tijdig geldend worden gemaakt.#Zaak C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) z 20. decembra 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation proti Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Smernica 2000/60/ES – Politika Európskej únie v oblasti vodného hospodárstva – Článok 4 ods. 1 a článok 14 ods. 1 – Povinnosti zabrániť zhoršeniu stavu vodných útvarov a podporiť aktívnu účasť všetkých dotknutých strán na vykonávanie smernice – Aarhuský dohovor – Účasť verejnosti na rozhodovacom procese a prístup k spravodlivosti v oblasti životného prostredia – Článok 6 a článok 9 ods. 3 a 4 – Charta základných práv Európskej únie – Článok 47 – Právo na účinnú súdnu ochranu – Projekt, ktorý môže mať vplyv na stav vôd – Správne konanie o udelenie povolenia – Organizácia na ochranu životného prostredia – Návrh na priznanie postavenie účastníka správneho konania – Možnosť domáhať sa práv vyplývajúcich zo smernice 2000/60/ES – Zánik postavenia účastníka konania a právo na prostriedok nápravy v prípade, že sa uvedené práva neuplatnia v priebehu správneho konania včas.#Vec C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 20 december 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation mot Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – Direktiv 2000/60/EG – Europeiska unionens politik inom vattenområdet – Artiklarna 4.1 och 14.1 – Skyldighet att förebygga en försämring av statusen i ytvattenförekomster och uppmuntra aktiv medverkan från samtliga berörda parter i genomförandet av direktivet – Århuskonventionen – Allmänhetens deltagande i beslutsprocesser och tillgång till rättslig prövning i miljöfrågor – Artiklarna 6, 9.3 och 9.4 – Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna – Artikel 47 – Rätt till ett effektivt domstolsskydd – Projekt som kan påverka vattenstatusen – Administrativt tillståndsförfarande – Miljöorganisation – Ansökan om att få partsställning i det administrativa förfarandet – Möjlighet att åberopa rättigheter enligt direktiv 2000/60/EG – Preklusion av partsställning och rätt att väcka talan om dessa rättigheter inte åberopas inom den angivna fristen under det administrativa förfarandet.#Mål C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 20 de dezembro de 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation contra Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Diretiva 2000/60/CE — Política da União Europeia no domínio das águas — Artigo 4.o, n.o 1, e artigo 14.o, n.o 1 — Obrigações de prevenir a deterioração do estado das massas de água e de incentivar a participação ativa de todas as partes interessadas na execução da diretiva — Convenção de Aarhus — Participação do público no processo de tomada de decisão e acesso à justiça em matéria de ambiente — Artigo 6.o e artigo 9.o, n.os 3 e 4 — Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União Europeia — Artigo 47.o — Direito à tutela jurisdicional efetiva — Projeto suscetível de ter impacto no estado das águas — Processo administrativo de licenciamento — Organização de defesa do ambiente — Pedido de obtenção do estatuto de parte no processo administrativo — Possibilidade de invocar direitos conferidos pela Diretiva 2000/60/CE — Preclusão do estatuto de parte no processo e do direito de recurso na falta de invocação dos referidos direitos, em tempo oportuno, no decurso do processo administrativo.#Processo C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 20. december 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation mod Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – direktiv 2000/60/EF – Den Europæiske Unions vandpolitiske foranstaltninger – artikel 4, stk. 1 og artikel 14, stk. 1 – forpligtelse til at forebygge forringelse af tilstanden for vandområder og til at tilskynde til, at alle interesserede parter inddrages aktivt i gennemførelsen af direktivet – Århuskonventionen – offentlig deltagelse i beslutningsprocesser samt adgang til klage og domstolsprøvelse på miljøområdet – artikel 6 og artikel 9, stk. 3 og 4 – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – artikel 47 – ret til en effektiv domstolsbeskyttelse – projekt, der kan få indvirkning på vandtilstanden – administrativ godkendelsesprocedure – miljøbeskyttelsesorganisation – anmodning om at opnå status som part i den administrative procedure – mulighed for at påberåbe sig rettighederne i henhold til direktiv 2000/60/EF – fortabelse af partsstatus i proceduren og af klageadgangen, såfremt de nævnte rettigheder ikke påberåbes rettidigt under den administrative procedure.#Sag C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 20. Dezember 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation gegen Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Richtlinie 2000/60/EG – Maßnahmen der Europäischen Union im Bereich der Wasserpolitik – Art. 4 Abs. 1 und Art. 14 Abs. 1 – Verpflichtung, eine Verschlechterung des Zustands der Wasserkörper zu verhindern, und Verpflichtung, die aktive Beteiligung aller interessierten Stellen an der Umsetzung der Richtlinie zu fördern – Übereinkommen von Aarhus – Beteiligung der Öffentlichkeit an Entscheidungsverfahren und Zugang zu Gerichten in Umweltangelegenheiten – Art. 6 und Art. 9 Abs. 3 und 4 – Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Art. 47 – Anspruch auf effektiven gerichtlichen Rechtsschutz – Vorhaben, das Auswirkungen auf den Zustand der Gewässer haben kann – Bewilligungsverfahren – Umweltorganisation – Antrag auf Zuerkennung der Stellung als Partei im Verwaltungsverfahren – Möglichkeit, sich auf Rechte aus der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG zu berufen – Verlust der Parteistellung und der Befugnis zur Beschwerdeerhebung bei fehlender rechtzeitiger Geltendmachung der Rechte aus der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG im Verwaltungsverfahren.#Rechtssache C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 20ής Δεκεμβρίου 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation κατά Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Αίτηση του Verwaltungsgerichtshof για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Οδηγία 2000/60/ΕΚ – Πολιτική της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης στον τομέα των υδάτων – Άρθρο 4, παράγραφος 1, και άρθρο 14, παράγραφος 1 – Υποχρέωση πρόληψης της υποβάθμισης της κατάστασης των υδατικών συστημάτων και υποχρέωση ενθάρρυνσης της ενεργούς συμμετοχής όλων των ενδιαφερόμενων μερών στην υλοποίηση της οδηγίας – Σύμβαση του Aarhus – Συμμετοχή του κοινού στη λήψη αποφάσεων και πρόσβαση στη δικαιοσύνη για περιβαλλοντικά θέματα – Άρθρο 6 και άρθρο 9, παράγραφοι 3 και 4 – Χάρτης των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης – Άρθρο 47 – Δικαίωμα αποτελεσματικής δικαστικής προστασίας – Έργο το οποίο ενδέχεται να έχει επιπτώσεις στην κατάσταση των υδάτων – Διοικητική διαδικασία αδειοδότησης – Οργάνωση για την προστασία του περιβάλλοντος – Αίτημα να της αναγνωριστεί η ιδιότητα του μέρους στη διοικητική διαδικασία – Δυνατότητα επίκλησης δικαιωμάτων που αντλούνται από την οδηγία 2000/60/ΕΚ – Αποκλεισμός της ιδιότητας του μέρους στη διαδικασία και του δικαιώματος προσφυγής σε περίπτωση που δεν γίνει έγκαιρη επίκληση των δικαιωμάτων αυτών στη διάρκεια της διοικητικής διαδικασίας.#Υπόθεση C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2017 m. gruodžio 20 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation prieš Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Verwaltungsgerichtshof prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Direktyva 2000/60/EB – Europos Sąjungos politika vandens srityje – 4 straipsnio 1 dalis ir 14 straipsnio 1 dalis – Pareiga neleisti prastėti vandens telkinių būklei ir skatinti visų susijusių šalių dalyvavimą įgyvendinant direktyvą – Orhuso konvencija – Visuomenės dalyvavimas priimant sprendimus ir teisė kreiptis į teismus aplinkos klausimais – 6 straipsnis ir 9 straipsnio 3 ir 4 dalys – Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartija – 47 straipsnis – Teisė į veiksmingą teisminę gynybą – Projektas, galintis turėti poveikio vandens būklei – Administracinė leidimo suteikimo procedūra – Aplinkos apsaugos organizacija – Prašymas pripažinti administracinės procedūros šalies statusą – Galimybė remtis iš Direktyvos 2000/60/EB kylančiomis teisėmis – Administracinės procedūros šalies statuso ir teisės apskųsti praradimas, jeigu vykstant šiai procedūrai laiku nepasiremiama tomis teisėmis.#Byla C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftsschutz Umweltorganisation v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gmünd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — EU action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1) and Article 14(1) — Obligations to prevent deterioration of the status of bodies of surface water and encourage the active involvement of all interested parties in the implementation of the directive — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters — Article 6 and Article 9(3) and (4) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection — Project that is likely to have an impact on water status — Administrative procedure for a permit — Environmental organisation — Application seeking to secure status as a party to the administrative procedure — Possibility of relying on rights deriving from Directive 2000/60/EC — Extinction of the status of party to the procedure and of the right to bring an action if those rights are not exercised within good time during the administrative procedure.#Case C-664/15.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Uitstel beantwoording vragen van het lid Gijs van Dijk over de documentaire “Beerput Nederland”,

  Mededeling (uitstel antwoord) · 18 December 2017 · Milieu-overtredende bedrijven die hiermee wegkomen

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Verslag van een schriftelijk overleg over uitvoering van de motie van de leden Van Eijs en Kröger inzake het proactief aanbieden van een bloedonderzoek

  Verslag van een schriftelijk overleg · 17 December 2017 · Antwoorden op vragen van de commissie over uitvoering van de motie van de leden Van Eijs en Kröger inzake het proactief aanbieden van een bloedonderzoek

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Kohtujurist Saugmandsgaard Øe, 14.12.2017 ettepanek.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH versus Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Euroopa Liidu kasvuhoonegaaside saastekvootidega kauplemise süsteem – Direktiiv 2003/87/EÜ – Kohaldamisala – Artikli 2 lõige 1 – I lisa – Saastekvootidega kauplemise süsteemiga hõlmatud tegevusalad – Polümeeride tootmine – Eraldiseisva käitise tarnitud soojus – Tasuta saastekvootide eraldamise taotlus – Ajavahemik 2013 – 2020.#Kohtuasi C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat H. Saugmandsgaard Øe fremsat den 14. december 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH mod Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – ordning for handel med kvoter for drivhusgasemissioner i Den Europæiske Union – direktiv 2003/87/EF – anvendelsesområde – artikel 2, stk. 1 – bilag I – aktivitet underlagt ordningen for handel – produktion af polymerer – anvendelse af varme fra et tredjepartsanlæg – anmodning om gratistildeling af emissionskvoter – perioden 2013-2020.#Sag C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, presentadas el 14 de diciembre de 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH contra Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Régimen para el comercio de derechos de emisión de gases de efecto invernadero en la Unión Europea — Directiva 2003/87/CE — Ámbito de aplicación — Artículo 2, apartado 1 — Anexo I — Actividades sujetas al citado régimen de comercio — Fabricación de polímeros — Utilización de calor suministrado por otra instalación — Solicitud de asignación de derechos de emisión gratuitos — Período 2013‑2020.#Asunto C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusie van advocaat-generaal H. Saugmandsgaard Øe van 14 december 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH tegen Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Verzoek van het Verwaltungsgericht Berlin om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Regeling voor de handel in broeikasgasemissierechten binnen de Europese Unie – Richtlijn 2003/87/EG – Werkingssfeer – Artikel 2, lid 1 – Bijlage I – Activiteiten die onderworpen zijn aan die regeling – Productie van polymeren – Gebruik van warmte die wordt geleverd door een derde installatie – Aanvraag voor kosteloze toewijzing van emissierechten – Periode 2013‑2020.#Zaak C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• H. Saugmandsgaard Øe főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2017. december 14.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH kontra Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#A Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Németország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – Üvegházhatású gázok kibocsátási egységeinek kereskedelmi rendszere az Európai Unióban – 2003/87/EK irányelv – Hatály – A 2. cikk (1) bekezdése – I. melléklet – A kereskedelmi rendszer hatálya alá tartozó tevékenységek – Polimerek gyártása – Harmadik létesítmény által szolgáltatott hő felhasználása – A kibocsátási egységek ingyenes kiosztása iránti kérelem – A 2013 – 2020‑as időszak.#C-577/16. sz. ügy.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts H. Saugmandsgaard Øe vom 14. Dezember 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH gegen Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Verwaltungsgerichts Berlin.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – System für den Handel mit Treibhausgasemissionszertifikaten in der Europäischen Union – Richtlinie 2003/87/EG – Geltungsbereich – Art. 2 Abs. 1 – Anhang I – Emissionshandelspflichtige Tätigkeiten – Herstellung von Polymeren – Nutzung der von einer Drittanlage gelieferten Wärme – Antrag auf Zuteilung kostenloser Emissionszertifikate – Handelszeitraum 2013 – 2020.#Rechtssache C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Заключение на генералния адвокат H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, представено на 14 декември 2017 г.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH срещу Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Схема за търговия с квоти за емисии на парникови газове в Европейския съюз — Директива 2003/87/EО — Приложно поле — Член 2, параграф 1 — Приложение I — Дейности, включени в схемата за търговия с квоти за емисии — Производство на полимери — Използване на топлинна енергия, доставяна от трета инсталация — Искане за безплатно разпределяне на квоти за емисии — Период 2013 — 2020 г.#Дело C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Concluziile avocatului general H. Saugmandsgaard Øe prezentate la 14 decembrie 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH împotriva Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Sistemul de comercializare a cotelor de emisie de gaze cu efect de seră în cadrul Uniunii Europene – Directiva 2003/87/CE – Domeniu de aplicare – Articolul 2 alineatul (1) – Anexa I – Activități supuse sistemului de comercializare – Producerea de polimeri – Utilizarea căldurii furnizate de o instalație terță – Cerere de alocare cu titlu gratuit a cotelor de emisie – Perioada 2013-2020.#Cauza C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca H. Saugmandsgaarda Øeja, predstavljeni 14. decembra 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH proti Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Evropski uniji – Direktiva 2003/87/ES – Področje uporabe – Člen 2(1) – Priloga I – Dejavnosti, za katere velja sistem za trgovanje – Proizvodnja polimerov – Uporaba toplote, ki jo dobavi tretja naprava – Prošnja za brezplačno dodelitev pravic do emisije – Obdobje 2013 – 2020.#Zadeva C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat H. Saugmandsgaard Øe föredraget den 14 december 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH mot Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – System för handel med utsläppsrätter för växthusgaser inom Europeiska unionen – Direktiv 2003/87/EG – Tillämpningsområde – Artikel 2.1 – Bilaga I – Verksamhetsområden som omfattas av systemet för handel med utsläppsrätter – Tillverkning av polymerer – Användning av värme som tillhandahålls av en utomstående anläggning – Ansökan om gratis tilldelning av utsläppsrätter – Perioden 2013 – 2020.#Mål C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusões do advogado-geral H. Saugmandsgaard Øe apresentadas em 14 de dezembro de 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH contra Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Regime de comércio de licenças de emissão de gases com efeito de estufa na União Europeia — Diretiva 2003/87/CE — Âmbito de aplicação — Artigo 2.o, n.o 1 — Anexo I — Atividades sujeitas ao regime de comércio — Produção de polímeros — Utilização de calor fornecido por outra instalação — Pedido de atribuição de licenças de emissão a título gratuito — Período 2013‑2020.#Processo C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Opinia rzecznika generalnego H. Saugmandsgaarda Øe przedstawiona w dniu 14 grudnia 2017 r.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH przeciwko Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – System handlu uprawnieniami do emisji gazów cieplarnianych w Unii Europejskiej – Dyrektywa 2003/87/WE – Zakres stosowania – Artykuł 2 ust. 1 – Załącznik I – Działalność objęta tym systemem handlu – Produkcja polimerów – Wykorzystanie energii cieplnej dostarczanej przez instalację nieobjętą systemem unijnym – Wniosek o przydział bezpłatnych uprawnień do emisji – Okres 2013 – 2020.#Sprawa C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika H. Saugmandsgaarda Øea od 14. prosinca 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH protiv Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Sustav trgovanja emisijskim jedinicama stakleničkih plinova unutar Europske unije – Direktiva 2003/87/EZ – Područje primjene – Članak 2. stavak 1. – Prilog I. – Djelatnosti koje podliježu sustavu trgovanja – Proizvodnja polimera – Uporaba topline koju isporučuje treće postrojenje – Zahtjev za besplatnu dodjelu emisijskih jedinica – Razdoblje 2013. – 2020.#Predmet C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Návrhy prednesené 14. decembra 2017 – generálny advokát H. Saugmandsgaard Øe.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH proti Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Systém obchodovania s emisnými kvótami skleníkových plynov v Európskej únii – Smernica 2003/87/ES – Pôsobnosť – Článok 2 ods. 1 – Príloha I – Činnosti podliehajúce systému obchodovania – Výroba polymérov – Používanie tepla dodávaného tretím zariadením – Žiadosť o bezodplatné pridelenie emisných kvót – Obdobie 2013 až 2020.#Vec C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusions de l'avocat général M. H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, présentées le 14 décembre 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Système d’échange de quotas d’émission de gaz à effet de serre dans l’Union européenne – Directive 2003/87/CE – Champ d’application – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Annexe I – Activités soumises au système d’échange – Production de polymères – Utilisation de chaleur fournie par une installation tierce – Demande d’allocation de quotas d’émission à titre gratuit – Période 2013‑2020.#Affaire C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ģenerāladvokāta H. Saugmandsgora Ēes [H. Saugmandsgaard Øe] secinājumi, 2017. gada 14. decembris.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH pret Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Verwaltungsgericht Berlin lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Siltumnīcas efektu izraisošo gāzu emisijas kvotu tirdzniecības sistēma Eiropas Savienībā – Direktīva 2003/87/EK – Piemērojamība – 2. panta 1. punkts – I pielikums – Darbības, uz kurām attiecas tirdzniecības sistēma – Polimēru ražošana – Trešās iekārtas piegādāta siltuma izmantošana – Pieteikums par emisijas kvotu bezmaksas sadali – Laikposms no 2013. līdz 2020. gadam.#Lieta C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Julkisasiamies H. Saugmandsgaard Øen ratkaisuehdotus 14.12.2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH vastaan Saksan valtio.#Verwaltungsgericht Berlinin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Kasvihuonekaasujen päästöoikeuksien kaupan järjestelmä Euroopan unionissa – Direktiivi 2003/87/EY – Soveltamisala – 2 artiklan 1 kohta – Liite I – Päästöoikeuksien kaupan järjestelmän alaisuuteen kuuluvat toiminnot – Polymeerien tuottaminen – Ulkopuolisen laitoksen toimittaman lämmön käyttö – Päästöoikeuksien maksutonta jakamista koskeva hakemus – Päästökauppakausi 2013 – 2020.#Asia C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Stanovisko generálního advokáta H. Saugmandsgaarda Øe přednesené dne 14. prosince 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Systém pro obchodování s povolenkami na emise skleníkových plynů v Evropské unii – Směrnice 2003/87/ES – Oblast působnosti – Článek 2 odst. 1 – Příloha I – Činnosti podléhající systému obchodování – Výroba polymerů – Využívání tepla dodávaného třetím zařízením – Žádost o bezplatné přidělení emisních povolenek – Období 2013 – 2020.#Věc C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Generalinio advokato H. Saugmandsgaard Øe išvada, pateikta 2017 m. gruodžio 14 d.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH prieš Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Verwaltungsgericht Berlin prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Šiltnamio efektą sukeliančių dujų apyvartinių taršos leidimų prekybos sistema Europos Sąjungoje – Direktyva 2003/87/EB – Taikymo sritis – 2 straipsnio 1 dalis – I priedas – Veikla, kuriai taikoma prekybos sistema – Polimerų gamyba – Trečiojo asmens įrenginio gaminamos šilumos panaudojimas – Paraiška dėl nemokamų apyvartinių taršos leidimų suteikimo – 2013 – 2020 m. laikotarpis.#Byla C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, ippreżentati fl-14 ta’ Diċembru 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH vs Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Sistema ta’ skambju ta’ kwoti ta’ emissjonijiet ta’ gass serra fl-Unjoni Ewropea – Direttiva 2003/87/KE – Kamp ta’ applikazzjoni – Artikolu 2(1) – Anness I – Attivitajiet suġġetti għas-sistema ta’ skambju – Produzzjoni ta’ polimeri – Użu ta’ sħana fornuta minn installazzjoni terza – Talba għal allokazzjoni ta’ kwoti ta’ emissjonijiet mingħajr ħlas – Perijodu 2013-2020.#Kawża C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, presentate il 14 dicembre 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH contro Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta da Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Ambiente – Sistema per lo scambio di quote di emissioni dei gas a effetto serra nell’Unione europea – Direttiva 2003/87/CE – Sfera di applicazione – Articolo 2, paragrafo 1 – Allegato I – Attività soggette al sistema di scambio – Produzione di polimeri – Utilizzazione di calore fornito da un impianto terzo – Domanda di assegnazione di quote di emissioni a titolo gratuito – Periodo 2013‑2020.#Causa C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Προτάσεις του γενικού εισαγγελέα Η. Saugmandsgaard Øe της 14ης Δεκεμβρίου 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH κατά Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Αίτηση του Verwaltungsgericht Berlin για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Σύστημα εμπορίας δικαιωμάτων εκπομπής αερίων θερμοκηπίου στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση – Οδηγία 2003/87/ΕΚ – Πεδίο εφαρμογής – Άρθρο 2, παράγραφος 1 – Παράρτημα I – Δραστηριότητες που υπόκεινται στο σύστημα εμπορίας – Παραγωγή πολυμερών – Χρήση θερμότητας που παρέχεται από τρίτη εγκατάσταση – Αίτηση δωρεάν κατανομής δικαιωμάτων εκπομπής – Περίοδος 2013-2020.#Υπόθεση C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  judgment · 14 December 2017 · Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 14 December 2017.#Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scope — Article 2(1) — Annex I — Activities subject to the trading scheme — Production of polymers — Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation — Application for free allocation of emission allowances — Period 2013-2020.#Case C-577/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source