Tussenrapportage kwartiermaker landelijk dekkend netwerk sociaaljuridische en financiele hulp
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 14 June 2026
Tussenrapportage kwartiermaker landelijk dekkend netwerk sociaaljuridische en financiele hulp
The world's political record
1,984 records · 8,055 documents
Also searched as: constitution, grondwet, rechtsstaat, rule of law
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 14 June 2026
Tussenrapportage kwartiermaker landelijk dekkend netwerk sociaaljuridische en financiele hulp
United States · United States Congress · 7 August 2026
United States · United States Congress · 19 March 2026
Original: EU-voorstel: Rechtsstaatrapport 2026 van de Europese Commissie (COM (2026) 900) (Engelstalige versie)
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 August 2026
Translated from Dutch
EU-voorstel: Rechtsstaatrapport 2026 van de Europese Commissie (COM (2026) 900) (Engelstalige versie)
United States · United States Congress · 12 February 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only. Artificial entities, such as corporations, shall have no rights under the Constitution and are subject to regulation. The amendment requires federal, state, and local governments to (1) regulate, limit, or prohibit election contributions and expenditures, including a candidate's own contributions and expenditures, to ensure equal access of citizens to the political process, regardless of economic status; and (2) require that any permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed. Additionally, the judiciary is prohibited from construing the spending of money to influence elections to be speech under the First Amendment.
European Union · European Parliament · 23 June 2026
Original: Motie van de leden Omtzigt en Six Dijkstra over een wetenschappelijke standaard voor modellen en algoritmes die afdwingbaar openbaar en navolgbaar zijn
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 14 January 2025
Translated from Dutch
Motie van de leden Omtzigt en Six Dijkstra over een wetenschappelijke standaard voor modellen en algoritmes die afdwingbaar openbaar en navolgbaar zijn
Original: Gewijzigde motie van het lid Dassen over overstappen op Europese, op open standaarden gebaseerde digitale alternatieven voor de digitale infrastructuur t.v.v. 36800-61
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 17 September 2025
Translated from Dutch
Gewijzigde motie van het lid Dassen over overstappen op Europese, op open standaarden gebaseerde digitale alternatieven voor de digitale infrastructuur t.v.v. 36800-61
United States · United States Congress · 6 February 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the Supreme Court to consist of nine Justices.
United States · United States Congress · 3 January 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the Supreme Court to be composed of nine Justices—one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices.
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 7 June 2026
Gesprekken over minimumstraffen en uitkomst onderzoek strafverzwaring
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 1 July 2025
Openbaarmaking van het verslag van de rapporteurs over Digitale rechtsstaat
United States · United States Congress · 22 May 2026
This resolution calls on the Nigerian government to ensure all legal proceedings involving Mazi Nnamdi Kanu are conducted in full accordance with Nigeria’s constitutional obligations and international human rights commitments.
United States · United States Congress · 22 July 2026
United States · United States Congress · 5 March 2026
Original: Voorstel van wet van het lid Tseggai houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet strekkende tot verruiming van de mogelijkheden tot tijdelijke vervanging van leden van de Tweede Kamer en de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, de provinciale staten, de gemeenteraden, de eilandsraden en de kiescolleges
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 October 2025
Translated from Dutch
Voorstel van wet van het lid Tseggai houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet strekkende tot verruiming van de mogelijkheden tot tijdelijke vervanging van leden van de Tweede Kamer en de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, de provinciale staten, de gemeenteraden, de eilandsraden en de kiescolleges
Germany · German Bundestag · 8 July 2026
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 May 2026
Antwoorden op vragen commissie over inzet internationale kindontvoering India (Kamerstuk 29279-1019)(eerste deel)
United States · United States Congress · 31 July 2025
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 31 May 2026
WODC-rapport ‘Ervaringen van procesdeelnemers met de OM-strafbeschikking
United States · United States Congress · 17 September 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing Congress and the states to (1) regulate and impose reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections; and (2) regulate and enact public campaign financing systems, including those designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by offsetting the raising and spending of money by candidates and others with increased public funding. The amendment grants Congress and the states the power to implement and enforce this amendment by legislation. They are allowed to distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such entities from spending money to influence elections.
United States · United States Congress · 18 November 2025
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 26 May 2026
Rapport PGHR ‘Wordt vervolgd: Buiten de rechter OM, geïntensiveerd’
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 26 May 2026
Reactie op verzoek commissie n.a.v. de burgerbrief over publiceren uitspraken
United States · United States Congress · 17 June 2026
United States · United States Congress · 29 April 2026
United States · United States Congress · 27 April 2026
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment related to the fundamental right to vote. Specifically, it grants every U.S. citizen of legal voting age the fundamental right to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides. Next, it specifies that the fundamental right to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, a state, or a political subdivision of a state, unless the denial or abridgment is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest by the least restrictive means. Finally, it repeals a specific portion of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which allows for the denial of the right to vote based on crime. (Currently, some states disallow individuals from voting, either temporarily or indefinitely, after incarceration for a felony.)
United States · United States Congress · 20 April 2026
Monitor Accountability Act This bill requires the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to establish conditions on the appointment of monitors to oversee state and local governmental entities. A monitor is an independent official appointed to oversee corrective reforms as part of a civil settlement agreement or consent decree, such as to remedy a pattern or practice of unconstitutional policing. Among the conditions, this bill requires notice and an opportunity for public comment prior to the appointment of a monitor, limits an individual to one monitor appointment at a time, sets a five-year term limit for monitors, and requires a public accounting of the fees charged and services provided by the monitor. It also caps fees and explicitly authorizes the use of pro bono services. In 2021, the Department of Justice began implementing a set of principles and specific recommendations regarding the use of monitors in civil settlement agreements and consent decrees involving state and local governmental entities, including recommendations relating to term limits, capping fees, and public accountability.
United States · United States Congress · 5 March 2026
United States · United States Congress · 29 January 2026
United States · United States Congress · 20 November 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment that requires federal expenditures and receipts to be balanced, which may occur over more than one year. Under the amendment, expenditures include all federal expenditures except those for payment of debt. Receipts do not include receipts derived from borrowing. The amendment requires Congress to achieve balance within 10 years of the ratification of the amendment. In an emergency situation, Congress may authorize additional expenditures that are not otherwise permitted by the amendment if two-thirds of the House of Representatives and the Senate agree to pass the bill. The additional expenditures must be for a limited time, and debts incurred from the expenditures must be paid as soon as practicable.
United States · United States Congress · 18 November 2025
United States · United States Congress · 29 October 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment that requires Members of Congress to forfeit their compensation during a government shutdown. Specifically, the amendment provides that Members of Congress must forfeit (and may not receive) any compensation for their services during any period in which there is a lapse in appropriations as a result of a failure to enact regular or continuing appropriations for one or more federal agencies or departments (i.e., government shutdown). Any funds that are forfeited under the amendment must be transferred to the Treasury and used to reduce the federal debt.
United States · United States Congress · 17 September 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing Congress and the states to (1) regulate and impose reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections; and (2) regulate and enact public campaign financing systems, including those designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by offsetting the raising and spending of money by candidates and others with increased public funding. The amendment grants Congress and the states the power to implement and enforce this amendment by legislation. They are allowed to distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such entities from spending money to influence elections.
United States · United States Congress · 15 July 2025
United States · United States Congress · 12 June 2025
United States · United States Congress · 10 April 2025
United States · United States Congress · 27 March 2025
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing Congress and the states to set reasonable limits on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections. The amendment grants Congress and the states the power to implement and enforce this amendment by legislation. They are allowed to distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such entities from spending money to influence elections.
United States · United States Congress · 25 March 2025
This joint resolution provides that the Equal Rights Amendment, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, was ratified by three-fourths of the states and is therefore a valid constitutional amendment, regardless of any time limit that was in the original proposal. The Equal Rights Amendment was originally proposed to the states in 1972. The original proposal included a deadline for ratification of March 22, 1979; Congress subsequently extended the deadline to June 30, 1982. Although the requisite 38 states have ratified the amendment, three of these states did so after the deadlines, and five states subsequently rescinded their ratifications. The status of the amendment has been the subject of litigation.
United States · United States Congress · 25 March 2025
United States · United States Congress · 5 March 2025
United States · United States Congress · 30 January 2025
This resolution designates January 30, 2025, as Fred Korematsu Day of Civil Liberties and the Constitution. It also encourages all people to reflect on the importance of political leadership and vigilance and on the values of justice and civil rights during times of uncertainty and emergency.
United States · United States Congress · 27 January 2025
Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act of 2025 or the FAIR Act of 2025 This bill establishes more stringent requirements for the federal government with respect to civil asset forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture generally refers to the seizure and forfeiture of property in connection with federal crimes. Specifically, the bill makes various changes to the general rules governing civil forfeiture proceedings. Among the changes, the bill generally requires the government to notify interested parties within 7 days (currently, 60 days) of a seizure, requires an indigent property owner to be represented by counsel regardless of whether the owner requests counsel, requires the government to meet a higher evidentiary standard in order to prove that seized property is connected to a crime, and expands the factors courts must consider in determining whether a forfeiture of property is constitutionally excessive. Additionally, the bill eliminates statutory authority for equitable sharing (i.e., sharing of federally forfeited assets with state, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies that participate in law enforcement efforts resulting in a forfeiture). It directs forfeiture proceeds to be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury instead of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Assets Forfeiture Fund. The bill requires a prompt probable cause hearing following the seizure of money involved in a structuring offense (i.e., structuring currency transactions to evade currency reporting requirements). Finally, the bill requires the annual report on deposits to the DOJ Assets Forfeiture Fund to specify total deposits from each type of forfeiture.
United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2025
Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations. Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known. The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that any reasonable officer would have known that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional. The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.
United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2025
Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 This bill allows a qualified individual to carry a concealed handgun into or possess a concealed handgun in another state that allows its residents to carry concealed firearms. A qualified individual must (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid state-issued concealed carry permit, or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in his or her state of residence.
United States · United States Congress · 8 January 2025
This joint resolution proposes constitutional amendments that (1) authorize the President to reduce or disapprove any appropriation in a bill or joint resolution using a line-item veto; (2) prohibit Members of Congress from serving more than six terms in the House of Representatives or two terms in the Senate; and (3) prohibit a chamber of Congress from agreeing to legislation that imposes, authorizes, or raises any tax or fee unless the legislation contains no other subject and is agreed to by an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the chamber.
United States · United States Congress · 7 January 2025
This joint resolution proposes an amendment to the Constitution establishing term limits for individuals serving in the Senate and the House of Representatives. The proposed amendment makes an individual who has served two terms in the Senate ineligible for appointment or election to the Senate and an individual who has served three terms as a Member of the House of Representatives ineligible for election to the House of Representatives. The joint resolution provides that the amendment shall be valid when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification. Under Article V of the Constitution, both chambers of Congress may propose an amendment by a vote of two-thirds of all Members present for such vote. A proposed amendment must be ratified by the states as prescribed in Article V and as specified by Congress.
United States · United States Congress · 3 August 2026
Original: Voorstel van wet van het lid Michon-Derkzen tot Wijziging van de Gemeentewet en de Wet openbare lichamen Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba in verband met de toevoeging van een bevoegdheid voor burgemeesters en gezaghebbers ter bevordering van de handhaving van de openbare orde met betrekking tot online oproepen (Wet online aangejaagde openbare-ordeverstoring)
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 14 July 2025
Translated from Dutch
Voorstel van wet van het lid Michon-Derkzen tot Wijziging van de Gemeentewet en de Wet openbare lichamen Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba in verband met de toevoeging van een bevoegdheid voor burgemeesters en gezaghebbers ter bevordering van de handhaving van de openbare orde met betrekking tot online oproepen (Wet online aangejaagde openbare-ordeverstoring)
Original: Motie van het lid Boomsma c.s. over het uitlezen van gegevensdragers zoals mobiele telefoons voortzetten
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 June 2026
Translated from Dutch
Motie van het lid Boomsma c.s. over het uitlezen van gegevensdragers zoals mobiele telefoons voortzetten
Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.
Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 16. juli 2026.#C. Limited mod M.S.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retsstat – dommeres uafhængighed – artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU – artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – national lovgivning, der gør det muligt at efterprøve overholdelsen af kravene om uafhængighed og upartiskhed for en fungerende dommer ved Sąd Najwyższy (øverste domstol, Polen) – sammensætningen af det dommerkollegium, der skal efterprøve overholdelsen af disse krav – uregelmæssighed ved omstændighederne omkring udnævnelsen af et medlem af et sådant dommerkollegium – følgerne af denne uregelmæssighed – upartiskhed – EU-rettens forrang.#Sag C-748/23.
Domstolens dom (fjärde avdelningen) av den 16 juli 2026.#C. Limited mot M. S.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Rättsstat – Domares oavhängighet – Artikel 19.1 andra stycket FEU – Artikel 47 i Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna – Nationell lagstiftning som gör det möjligt att kontrollera huruvida en domare som tjänstgör vid Sąd Najwyższy (Högsta domstolen, Polen) uppfyller kraven på oavhängighet och opartiskhet – Vilka domare som ingår i den dömande sammansättning som ska kontrollera huruvida dessa krav är uppfyllda – Villkoren för utnämning av en ledamot som ingår i en sådan sammansättning är behäftade med en oegentlighet – Följderna av denna oegentlighet – Opartiskhet – Unionsrättens företräde.#Mål C-748/23.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Ir-Raba' Awla) tas-16 ta’ Lulju 2026.#C. Limited vs M. S.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Stat tad-dritt – Indipendenza tal-membri tal-ġudikatura – It-tieni subparagrafu tal-Artikolu 19(1) TUE – Artikolu 47 tal-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tippermetti li tiġi vverifikata l-osservanza tar-rekwiżiti ta’ indipendenza u ta’ imparzjalità ta’ mħallef fil-kariga fi ħdan is-Sąd Najwyższy (il-Qorti Suprema, il-Polonja) – Kompożizzjoni tal-kulleġġ ġudikanti mitlub jistħarreġ l-osservanza ta’ dawn ir-rekwiżiti – Irregolarità tal-kundizzjonijiet tal-ħatra ta’ membru ta’ tali kulleġġ – Konsegwenzi li għandhom jinsiltu minn din l-irregolarità – Imparzjalità – Supremazija tad-dritt tal-Unjoni.#Kawża C-748/23.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Quarta Secção) de 16 de julho de 2026.#C. Limited contra M. S.#Reenvio prejudicial — Estado de direito — Independência dos juízes — Artigo 19.°, n.° 1, segundo parágrafo, TUE — Artigo 47.° da Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União Europeia — Legislação nacional que permite verificar o cumprimento das exigências de independência e imparcialidade de um juiz em funções no Sąd Najwyższy (Supremo Tribunal, Polónia) — Composição da formação de julgamento chamada a verificar o cumprimento dessas exigências — Irregularidade nas condições de nomeação de um membro dessa formação — Consequências a retirar desta irregularidade — Imparcialidade — Primado do direito da União.#Processo C-748/23.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (neljäs jaosto) 16.7.2026.#C. Limited vastaan M. S.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Oikeusvaltio – Tuomareiden riippumattomuus – SEU 19 artiklan 1 kohdan toinen alakohta – Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirjan 47 artikla – Kansallinen säännöstö, joka mahdollistaa sen tarkastamisen, että Sąd Najwyższyn tuomarinvirassa toimiva tuomari täyttää puolueettomuuden ja riippumattomuuden vaatimukset – Ratkaisukokoonpano, jonka on tarkastettava, noudatetaanko kyseisiä vaatimuksia – Tällaisen ratkaisukokoonpanon jäsenen nimittämiseen liittyviä olosuhteita koskeva sääntöjenvastaisuus – Tällaisesta sääntöjenvastaisuudesta aiheutuvat seuraukset – Puolueettomuus – Unionin oikeuden ensisijaisuus.#Asia C-748/23.
Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#C. Limited contre M. S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – État de droit – Indépendance des juges – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Réglementation nationale permettant de vérifier le respect des exigences d’indépendance et d’impartialité d’un juge en poste au sein du Sąd Najwyższy (Cour suprême, Pologne) – Composition de la formation de jugement appelée à contrôler le respect de ces exigences – Irrégularité des conditions de nomination d’un membre d’une telle formation – Conséquences à tirer de cette irrégularité – Impartialité – Primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-748/23.
Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 16. julija 2026.#C. Limited proti M. S.#Predhodno odločanje – Pravna država – Neodvisnost sodnikov – Člen 19(1), drugi pododstavek, PEU – Člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Nacionalna ureditev, ki omogoča preizkus, ali sodnik Sąd Najwyższy (vrhovno sodišče, Poljska) izpolnjuje zahtevi po neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti – Sestava senata, ki je pristojen za preizkušanje izpolnjevanja teh zahtev – Nepravilnosti v zvezi s pogoji za imenovanje člana takega senata – Posledice teh nepravilnosti – Nepristranskost – Primarnost prava Unije.#Zadeva C-748/23.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (štvrtá komora) zo 16. júla 2026.#C. Limited v. M. S.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Právny štát – Nezávislosť sudcov – Článok 19 ods. 1 druhý pododsek ZEÚ – Článok 47 Charty základných práv Európskej únie – Vnútroštátna právna úprava umožňujúca overiť dodržanie požiadaviek nezávislosti a nestrannosti sudcu pôsobiaceho na Sąd Najwyższy (Najvyšší súd, Poľsko) – Zloženie rozhodovacieho zloženia, ktoré má kontrolovať dodržanie týchto požiadaviek – Nezrovnalosti v podmienkach vymenovania člena takého zloženia – Dôsledky, ktoré treba vyvodiť z tejto nezrovnalosti – Nestrannosť – Prednosť práva Únie.#Vec C-748/23.
Wyrok Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 16 lipca 2026 r.#C. Limited przeciwko M. S.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Państwo prawne – Niezawisłość sędziowska – Artykuł 19 ust. 1 akapit drugi TUE – Artykuł 47 Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Uregulowania krajowe pozwalające na zbadanie spełnienia wymogów niezawisłości i bezstronności przez czynnych sędziów Sądu Najwyższego (Polska) – Ukształtowanie składu orzekającego, który ma zbadać spełnienie tych wymogów – Nieprawidłowość w procedurze powołania członka takiego składu – Konsekwencje, jakie należy wyciągnąć z tej nieprawidłowości – Bezstronność – Pierwszeństwo prawa Unii.#Sprawa C-748/23.
A Bíróság ítélete (negyedik tanács), 2026. július 16.#C. Limited kontra M. S.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Jogállamiság – Bírói függetlenség – Az EUSZ 19. cikk (1) bekezdésének második albekezdése – Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartájának 47. cikke – A Sąd Najwyższyra (legfelsőbb bíróság, Lengyelország) kinevezett bíró függetlenségére és pártatlanságára vonatkozó követelmények tiszteletben tartásának vizsgálatát lehetővé tévő nemzeti szabályozás – Az e követelményeknek való megfelelés ellenőrzésére hivatott ítélkező testület összetétele – Az ilyen testület tagja kinevezési feltételeinek szabálytalansága – Az e szabálytalanságból levonandó következtetések – Pártatlanság – Az uniós jog elsőbbsége.#C-748/23. sz. ügy.
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#C. Limited v M. S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation permitting a review of compliance with the requirements of independence and impartiality of a judge sitting in the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Composition of the panel of judges called upon to review compliance with those requirements – Irregularities in the appointment of a member of the panel – Consequences of such irregularities – Impartiality – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-748/23.
Agreed to Senate
Agreed to Senate · 15 July 2026 · A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that under no circumstances should Samuel Bankman-Fried receive executive clemency, including a pardon or commutation, and affirming the Senate's commitment to the rule of law and integrity of the United States financial system.
Rettens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 15. juli 2026.#Den Tjekkiske Republik mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Unionens ansvar uden for kontraktforhold – EGFL og ELFUL – dom om annullation af en afgørelse fra Kommissionen om udelukkelse fra EU-finansiering af visse udgifter, som medlemsstaterne har afholdt for EGFL og ELFUL – Kommissionens tilbagebetaling af det uretmæssigt opkrævede beløb – Kommissionens afslag på at betale renter af det for meget opkrævede beløb – pligt til at betale renter – fast kompensation for fratagelsen af rådigheden over det beløb, der uretmæssigt er blevet betalt til Kommissionen – artikel 266 TEUF – tilstrækkeligt kvalificeret tilsidesættelse af en bestemmelse, der tillægger borgerne rettigheder.#Sag T-661/24.
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Tercera) de 15 de julio de 2026.#República Checa contra Comisión Europea.#Responsabilidad extracontractual de la Unión — FEAGA y Feader — Sentencia mediante la que se anula una decisión de la Comisión por la que se excluyen de la financiación de la Unión determinados gastos efectuados por los Estados miembros con cargo al FEAGA y al Feader — Reembolso por parte de la Comisión del importe indebidamente recaudado — Negativa de la Comisión a abonar intereses sobre la cantidad recaudada en exceso — Obligación de abonar intereses — Indemnización a tanto alzado por la privación del disfrute de la cantidad indebidamente pagada a la Comisión — Artículo 266 TFUE — Infracción suficientemente caracterizada de una norma jurídica que confiere derechos a los particulares.#Asunto T-661/24.
Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (tretia komora) z 15. júla 2026.#Česká republika v. Európska komisia.#Mimozmluvná zodpovednosť Únie – EPZF a EPFVR – Rozsudok, ktorým sa zrušuje rozhodnutie Komisie o vylúčení určitých výdavkov vynaložených členskými štátmi v rámci EPZF a EPFVR z financovania Úniou – Vrátenie neoprávnene získanej sumy Komisiou – Odmietnutie Komisie zaplatiť úroky z preplatku – Povinnosť vyplatiť úroky – Paušálna náhrada za stratu pôžitkov vyplývajúcich zo sumy, ktorá bola neoprávnene vyplatená Komisii – Článok 266 ZFEÚ – Dostatočne závažné porušenie právnej normy, ktorá priznáva práva jednotlivcom.#Vec T-661/24.
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#République tchèque contre Commission européenne.#Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union – FEAGA et Feader – Arrêt annulant une décision de la Commission écartant du financement de l’Union certaines dépenses effectuées par les États membres au titre du FEAGA et du Feader – Remboursement par la Commission de la somme indûment perçue – Refus de la Commission de verser des intérêts sur le trop-perçu – Obligation de verser des intérêts – Indemnisation forfaitaire de la privation de la jouissance de la somme indûment payée à la Commission – Article 266 TFUE – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers.#Affaire T-661/24.
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Terceira Secção) de 15 de julho de 2026.#República Checa contra Comissão Europeia.#Responsabilidade extracontratual da União — FEAGA e FEADER — Acórdão que anula uma decisão da Comissão que exclui do financiamento da União determinadas despesas efetuadas pelos Estados‑Membros a título do FEAGA e do FEADER — Reembolso pela Comissão do montante cobrado indevidamente — Recusa de a Comissão pagar juros sobre o montante cobrado em excesso — Obrigação de pagar juros — Indemnização fixa pela privação do gozo do montante indevidamente pago à Comissão — Artigo 266.° TFUE — Violação suficientemente caracterizada de uma regra de direito que confere direitos aos particulares.#Processo T-661/24.
Rozsudek Tribunálu (třetího senátu) ze dne 15. července 2026.#Česká republika v. Evropská komise.#Mimosmluvní odpovědnost Unie – EZZF a EZFRV – Rozsudek, kterým se zrušuje rozhodnutí Komise o vyloučení některých výdajů vynaložených členskými státy v rámci EZZF a EZFRV z unijního financování – Vrácení neoprávněně vybrané částky Komisí – Odmítnutí Komise zaplatit úroky z přeplatku – Povinnost zaplatit úroky – Paušální náhrada ztráty požitků plynoucích z částky neoprávněně vyplacené Komisi – Článek 266 SFEU – Dostatečně závažné porušení právní normy přiznávající práva jednotlivcům.#Věc T-661/24.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a treia) din 15 iulie 2026.#Republica Cehă împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Răspundere extracontractuală a Uniunii – FEGA și FEADR – Hotărâre prin care se anulează o decizie a Comisiei de excludere de la finanțarea de către Uniune a anumitor cheltuieli efectuate de statele membre în cadrul FEGA și al FEADR – Rambursare de către Comisie a sumei percepute în mod nejustificat – Refuz al Comisiei de a plăti dobânzi pentru suma percepută excedentar – Obligația de a plăti dobânzi – Despăgubire forfetară pentru privarea de folosința sumei plătite în mod nejustificat Comisiei – Articolul 266 TFUE – Încălcare suficient de gravă a unei norme de drept prin care se conferă drepturi particularilor.#Cauza T-661/24.
Wyrok Sądu (trzecia izba) z dnia 15 lipca 2026 r.#Republika Czeska przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Odpowiedzialność pozaumowna Unii – EFRG i EFRROW – Wyrok stwierdzający nieważność decyzji Komisji wyłączającej z finansowania Unii niektóre wydatki poniesione przez państwa członkowskie z tytułu EFRG i EFRROW – Zwrot przez Komisję kwoty nienależnie pobranej – Odmowa zapłaty przez Komisję odsetek od nadpłaconej kwoty – Obowiązek zapłaty odsetek – Zryczałtowane odszkodowanie za pozbawienie możliwości korzystania z kwoty nienależnie wypłaconej Komisji – Artykuł 266 TFUE – Wystarczająco istotne naruszenie normy prawa przyznającej uprawnienia jednostkom.#Sprawa T-661/24.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 15. julija 2026.#Češka republika proti Evropski komisiji.#Nepogodbena odgovornost Unije – EKJS in EKSRP – Sodba o razglasitvi ničnosti sklepa Komisije o izključitvi nekaterih odhodkov držav članic iz naslova EKJS in EKSRP iz financiranja Unije – Vračilo neupravičeno prejetega zneska s strani Komisije – Zavrnitev Komisije, da plača obresti na preplačilo – Obveznost plačila obresti – Pavšalno nadomestilo za nezmožnost razpolaganja z zneskom, ki je bil neupravičeno plačan Komisiji – Člen 266 PDEU – Dovolj resna kršitev pravnega pravila, s katerim so posameznikom podeljene pravice.#Zadeva T-661/24.
Sentenza del Tribunale (Terza Sezione) del 15 luglio 2026.#Repubblica ceca contro Commissione europea.#Responsabilità extracontrattuale dell’Unione – FEAGA e FEASR – Sentenza che annulla una decisione della Commissione recante esclusione dal finanziamento dell’Unione di alcune spese sostenute dagli Stati membri nell’ambito del FEAGA e del FEASR – Rimborso da parte della Commissione della somma indebitamente percepita – Rifiuto della Commissione di versare interessi sulla somma percepita in eccesso – Obbligo di versare interessi – Risarcimento forfettario per la privazione del godimento della somma indebitamente corrisposta alla Commissione – Articolo 266 TFUE – Violazione sufficientemente qualificata di una norma giuridica che conferisce diritti ai singoli.#Causa T-661/24.
Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (It-Tielet Awla) tal-15 ta’ Lulju 2026.#Ir-Repubblika Ċeka vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Responsabbiltà mhux kuntrattwali tal-Unjoni – FAEG u FAEŻR – Sentenza li tannulla deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni li teskludi mill-finanzjament tal-Unjoni ċertu nfiq mill-Istati Membri taħt il-FAEG u l-FAEŻR – Rimbors mill-Kummissjoni tas-somma miġbura indebitament – Rifjut tal-Kummissjoni li tħallas interessi fuq il-ġbir żejjed – Obbligu ta’ ħlas ta’ interessi – Kumpens b’rata fissa għaċ-ċaħda tat-tgawdija tas-somma mħallsa indebitament lill-Kummissjoni – Artikolu 266 TFUE – Ksur suffiċjentement serju ta’ regola tad-dritt li tagħti drittijiet lill-individwi.#Kawża T-661/24.
Arrest van het Gerecht (Derde kamer) van 15 juli 2026.#Tsjechische Republiek tegen Europese Commissie.#Niet-contractuele aansprakelijkheid van de Unie – ELGF en Elfpo – Arrest houdende nietigverklaring van een besluit van de Commissie tot onttrekking aan Uniefinanciering van bepaalde uitgaven van de lidstaten in het kader van het ELGF en het Elfpo – Terugbetaling door de Commissie van het ten onterechte geïnde bedrag – Weigering van de Commissie om rente over het te veel betaalde uit te keren – Verplichting rente uit te keren – Forfaitaire vergoeding voor het gemis van het genot van het onverschuldigd aan de Commissie betaalde bedrag – Artikel 266 VWEU – Voldoende gekwalificeerde schending van een rechtsregel die particulieren rechten toekent.#Zaak T-661/24.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.
Rettens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 15. juli 2026.#Den Tjekkiske Republik mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Unionens ansvar uden for kontrakt – EGFL og ELFUL – dom, hvorved en afgørelse fra Kommissionen om udelukkelse fra EU-finansiering af visse udgifter, som medlemsstaterne har afholdt inden for rammerne af EGFL og ELFUL, annulleres – Kommissionens tilbagebetaling af det uberettiget opkrævede beløb – Kommissionens afslag på at betale renter af det for meget opkrævede beløb – forpligtelse til at betale renter – fast kompensation for fratagelsen af rådigheden over det beløb, som uretmæssigt er betalt til Kommissionen – artikel 266 TEUF – tilstrækkeligt kvalificeret tilsidesættelse af en bestemmelse, som tillægger borgerne rettigheder.#Sag T-661/24.
A Törvényszék ítélete (harmadik tanács), 2026. július 15.#Cseh Köztársaság kontra Európai Bizottság.#Az Unió szerződésen kívüli felelőssége – EMGA és EMVA – Az EMGA és az EMVA terhére a tagállamok által kifizetett egyes kiadásokat az európai uniós finanszírozásból kizáró bizottsági határozatot megsemmisítő ítélet – A jogalap nélkül beszedett összeg Bizottság általi visszatérítése – A túlfizetés utáni kamatfizetés Bizottság általi megtagadása – Kamatfizetési kötelezettség – A Bizottság részére jogalap nélkül kifizetett összeg élvezetétől való megfosztásáért járó átalányösszegű kártérítés – EUMSZ 266. cikk – Magánszemélyek számára jogokat keletkeztető jogszabály kellően súlyos megsértése.#T-661/24. sz. ügy.
Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (It-Tielet Awla) tal-15 ta’ Lulju 2026.#Ir-Repubblika Ċeka vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Responsabbiltà mhux kuntrattwali tal-Unjoni – FAEG u FAEŻR – Sentenza li tannulla deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni li teskludi mill-finanzjament tal-Unjoni ċertu nfiq mill-Istati Membri taħt il-FAEG u l-FAEŻR – Rimbors mill-Kummissjoni tas-somma miġbura indebitament – Rifjut tal-Kummissjoni li tħallas interessi fuq il-ġbir żejjed – Obbligu ta’ ħlas ta’ interessi – Kumpens b’rata fissa għaċ-ċaħda tat-tgawdija tas-somma mħallsa indebitament lill-Kummissjoni – Artikolu 266 TFUE – Ksur suffiċjentement serju ta’ regola tad-dritt li tagħti drittijiet lill-individwi.#Kawża T-661/24.
Üldkohtu otsus (kolmas koda), 15.7.2026.#Tšehhi Vabariik versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Liidu lepinguväline vastutus – EAGF ja EAFRD – Kohtuotsus, millega tühistatakse komisjoni otsus, mille kohaselt ei rahastata liidu vahenditest teatavaid kulusid, mida liikmesriigid on kandnud EAGFi ja EAFRD raames – Alusetult saadud summa tagasimaksmine komisjoni poolt – Komisjoni keeldumine maksta alusetult saadud summalt intressi – Kohustus maksta intressi – Kindlasummaline hüvitis alusetult komisjonile makstud summa kasutamise võimalusest ilmajätmise eest – ELTL artikkel 266 – Isikutele õigusi andva õigusnormi piisavalt selge rikkumine.#Kohtuasi T-661/24.
Wyrok Sądu (trzecia izba) z dnia 15 lipca 2026 r.#Republika Czeska przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Odpowiedzialność pozaumowna Unii – EFRG i EFRROW – Wyrok stwierdzający nieważność decyzji Komisji wyłączającej z finansowania Unii niektóre wydatki poniesione przez państwa członkowskie z tytułu EFRG i EFRROW – Zwrot przez Komisję kwoty nienależnie pobranej – Odmowa zapłaty przez Komisję odsetek od nadpłaconej kwoty – Obowiązek zapłaty odsetek – Zryczałtowane odszkodowanie za pozbawienie możliwości korzystania z kwoty nienależnie wypłaconej Komisji – Artykuł 266 TFUE – Wystarczająco istotne naruszenie normy prawa przyznającej uprawnienia jednostkom.#Sprawa T-661/24.
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a treia) din 15 iulie 2026.#Republica Cehă împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Răspundere extracontractuală a Uniunii – FEGA și FEADR – Hotărâre prin care se anulează o decizie a Comisiei de excludere de la finanțarea de către Uniune a anumitor cheltuieli efectuate de statele membre în cadrul FEGA și al FEADR – Rambursare de către Comisie a sumei percepute în mod nejustificat – Refuz al Comisiei de a plăti dobânzi pentru suma percepută excedentar – Obligația de a plăti dobânzi – Despăgubire forfetară pentru privarea de folosința sumei plătite în mod nejustificat Comisiei – Articolul 266 TFUE – Încălcare suficient de gravă a unei norme de drept prin care se conferă drepturi particularilor.#Cauza T-661/24.
Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (tretia komora) z 15. júla 2026.#Česká republika v. Európska komisia.#Mimozmluvná zodpovednosť Únie – EPZF a EPFVR – Rozsudok, ktorým sa zrušuje rozhodnutie Komisie o vylúčení určitých výdavkov vynaložených členskými štátmi v rámci EPZF a EPFVR z financovania Úniou – Vrátenie neoprávnene získanej sumy Komisiou – Odmietnutie Komisie zaplatiť úroky z preplatku – Povinnosť vyplatiť úroky – Paušálna náhrada za stratu pôžitkov vyplývajúcich zo sumy, ktorá bola neoprávnene vyplatená Komisii – Článok 266 ZFEÚ – Dostatočne závažné porušenie právnej normy, ktorá priznáva práva jednotlivcom.#Vec T-661/24.
Presuda Općeg suda (treće vijeće) od 15. srpnja 2026.#Češka Republika protiv Europske komisije.#Izvanugovorna odgovornost Unije – EFJP i EPFRR – Presuda kojom se poništava odluka Komisije o isključenju iz financiranja Unije određenih izdataka nastalih za države članice u okviru EFJP‑a i EPFRR‑a – Povrat neosnovano primljenog iznosa koji izvršava Komisija – Odbijanje Komisije da plati kamate na preplaćeni iznos – Obveza plaćanja kamata – Paušalno obeštećenje zbog nemogućnosti korištenja iznosa koji je neosnovano isplaćen Komisiji – Članak 266. UFEU‑a – Dovoljno ozbiljna povreda pravnog pravila kojim se dodjeljuju prava pojedincima.#Predmet T-661/24.
2026 m. liepos 15 d. Bendrojo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas.#Čekijos Respublika prieš Europos Komisiją.#Sąjungos deliktinė atsakomybė – EŽŪGF ir EŽŪFKP – Sprendimas, kuriuo panaikinamas Komisijos sprendimas dėl valstybių narių patirtų tam tikrų išlaidų nefinansavimo Europos Sąjungos lėšomis iš EŽŪGF ir EŽŪFKP – Komisijos grąžinama nepagrįstai gauta suma – Komisijos atsisakymas mokėti palūkanas už permoką – Pareiga mokėti palūkanas – Fiksuoto dydžio kompensacija už prarastą galimybę naudotis Komisijai nepagrįstai sumokėta suma – SESV 266 straipsnis – Pakankamai aiškus teisės normos, suteikiančios teisių privatiems asmenims, pažeidimas.#Byla T-661/24.
Arrest van het Gerecht (Derde kamer) van 15 juli 2026.#Tsjechische Republiek tegen Europese Commissie.#Niet-contractuele aansprakelijkheid van de Unie – ELGF en Elfpo – Arrest houdende nietigverklaring van een besluit van de Commissie tot onttrekking aan Uniefinanciering van bepaalde uitgaven van de lidstaten in het kader van het ELGF en het Elfpo – Terugbetaling door de Commissie van het ten onterechte geïnde bedrag – Weigering van de Commissie om rente over het te veel betaalde uit te keren – Verplichting rente uit te keren – Forfaitaire vergoeding voor het gemis van het genot van het onverschuldigd aan de Commissie betaalde bedrag – Artikel 266 VWEU – Voldoende gekwalificeerde schending van een rechtsregel die particulieren rechten toekent.#Zaak T-661/24.
Vispārējās tiesas spriedums (trešā palāta), 2026. gada 15. jūlijs.#Čehijas Republika pret Eiropas Komisija.#Savienības ārpuslīgumiskā atbildība – ELGF un ELFLA – Spriedums, ar kuru atcelts Komisijas lēmums, ar ko no Savienības finansējuma izslēgti atsevišķi dalībvalstu izdevumi, kurus tās bija attiecinājušas uz ELGF un ELFLA – Komisijas veikta nepamatoti saņemto summu atmaksa – Komisijas atteikums maksāt procentus par pārmaksāto summu – Pienākums maksāt procentus – Vienotas likmes kompensācija par liegumu izmantot Komisijai nepamatoti samaksāto summu – LESD 266. pants – Pietiekami būtisks tādas tiesību normas pārkāpums, ar kuru privātpersonām piešķir tiesības.#Lieta T-661/24.
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Tercera) de 15 de julio de 2026.#República Checa contra Comisión Europea.#Responsabilidad extracontractual de la Unión — FEAGA y Feader — Sentencia mediante la que se anula una decisión de la Comisión por la que se excluyen de la financiación de la Unión determinados gastos efectuados por los Estados miembros con cargo al FEAGA y al Feader — Reembolso por parte de la Comisión del importe indebidamente recaudado — Negativa de la Comisión a abonar intereses sobre la cantidad recaudada en exceso — Obligación de abonar intereses — Indemnización a tanto alzado por la privación del disfrute de la cantidad indebidamente pagada a la Comisión — Artículo 266 TFUE — Infracción suficientemente caracterizada de una norma jurídica que confiere derechos a los particulares.#Asunto T-661/24.
Urteil des Gerichts (Dritte Kammer) vom 15. Juli 2026.#Tschechische Republik gegen Europäische Kommission.#Außervertragliche Haftung der Union – EGLF und ELER – Urteil, mit dem ein Beschluss der Kommission über den Ausschluss bestimmter von den Mitgliedstaaten zulasten des EGFL und des ELER getätigter Ausgaben von der Finanzierung durch die Union für nichtig erklärt wird – Erstattung des rechtsgrundlos vereinnahmten Betrags durch die Kommission – Weigerung der Kommission, Zinsen auf den Überschussbetrag zu zahlen – Pflicht zur Zahlung von Zinsen – Pauschale Entschädigung für die Vorenthaltung der Nutzung des rechtsgrundlos an die Kommission gezahlten Betrags – Art. 266 AEUV – Hinreichend qualifizierter Verstoß gegen eine Rechtsnorm, die dem Einzelnen Rechte verleiht.#Rechtssache T-661/24.
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Terceira Secção) de 15 de julho de 2026.#República Checa contra Comissão Europeia.#Responsabilidade extracontratual da União — FEAGA e FEADER — Acórdão que anula uma decisão da Comissão que exclui do financiamento da União determinadas despesas efetuadas pelos Estados‑Membros a título do FEAGA e do FEADER — Reembolso pela Comissão do montante cobrado indevidamente — Recusa de a Comissão pagar juros sobre o montante cobrado em excesso — Obrigação de pagar juros — Indemnização fixa pela privação do gozo do montante indevidamente pago à Comissão — Artigo 266.o TFUE — Violação suficientemente caracterizada de uma regra de direito que confere direitos aos particulares.#Processo T-661/24.
Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (τρίτο τμήμα) της 15ης Ιουλίου 2026.#Τσεχική Δημοκρατία κατά Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή.#Εξωσυμβατική ευθύνη της Ένωσης – ΕΓΤΕ και ΕΓΤΑΑ – Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου με την οποία ακυρώθηκε απόφαση της Επιτροπής για τον αποκλεισμό από τη χρηματοδότηση της Ένωσης ορισμένων δαπανών που πραγματοποιήθηκαν από τα κράτη μέλη στο πλαίσιο του ΕΓΤΕ και του ΕΓΤΑΑ – Επιστροφή από την Επιτροπή του αχρεωστήτως καταβληθέντος ποσού – Άρνηση της Επιτροπής να καταβάλει τόκους επί του αχρεωστήτως καταβληθέντος ποσού – Υποχρέωση καταβολής τόκων – Κατ’ αποκοπήν αποζημίωση για τη στέρηση της δυνατότητας χρήσεως του αχρεωστήτως καταβληθέντος στην Επιτροπή ποσού – Άρθρο 266 ΣΛΕΕ – Κατάφωρη παράβαση κανόνα δικαίου που παρέχει δικαιώματα στους ιδιώτες.#Υπόθεση T-661/24.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 15. julija 2026.#Češka republika proti Evropski komisiji.#Nepogodbena odgovornost Unije – EKJS in EKSRP – Sodba o razglasitvi ničnosti sklepa Komisije o izključitvi nekaterih odhodkov držav članic iz naslova EKJS in EKSRP iz financiranja Unije – Vračilo neupravičeno prejetega zneska s strani Komisije – Zavrnitev Komisije, da plača obresti na preplačilo – Obveznost plačila obresti – Pavšalno nadomestilo za nezmožnost razpolaganja z zneskom, ki je bil neupravičeno plačan Komisiji – Člen 266 PDEU – Dovolj resna kršitev pravnega pravila, s katerim so posameznikom podeljene pravice.#Zadeva T-661/24.
Sentenza del Tribunale (Terza Sezione) del 15 luglio 2026.#Repubblica ceca contro Commissione europea.#Responsabilità extracontrattuale dell’Unione – FEAGA e FEASR – Sentenza che annulla una decisione della Commissione recante esclusione dal finanziamento dell’Unione di alcune spese sostenute dagli Stati membri nell’ambito del FEAGA e del FEASR – Rimborso da parte della Commissione della somma indebitamente percepita – Rifiuto della Commissione di versare interessi sulla somma percepita in eccesso – Obbligo di versare interessi – Risarcimento forfettario per la privazione del godimento della somma indebitamente corrisposta alla Commissione – Articolo 266 TFUE – Violazione sufficientemente qualificata di una norma giuridica che conferisce diritti ai singoli.#Causa T-661/24.
Решение на Общия съд (трети състав) от 15 юли 2026 г.#Чешка република срещу Европейска комисия.#Извъндоговорна отговорност на Съюза — ЕФГЗ и ЕЗФРСР — Съдебно решение, с което се отменя решение на Комисията за изключване от финансиране от страна на Съюза на някои разходи, направени от държавите членки по линия на ЕФГЗ и ЕЗФРСР — Възстановяване от Комисията на недължимо получената сума — Отказ на Комисията да плати лихви върху надвзетата сума — Задължение за плащане на лихви — Фиксирано обезщетение за лишаването от ползване на сумата, недължимо платена на Комисията — Член 266 ДФЕС — Достатъчно съществено нарушение на правна норма, с която се предоставят права на частноправните субекти.#Дело T-661/24.
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#République tchèque contre Commission européenne.#Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union – FEAGA et Feader – Arrêt annulant une décision de la Commission écartant du financement de l’Union certaines dépenses effectuées par les États membres au titre du FEAGA et du Feader – Remboursement par la Commission de la somme indûment perçue – Refus de la Commission de verser des intérêts sur le trop-perçu – Obligation de verser des intérêts – Indemnisation forfaitaire de la privation de la jouissance de la somme indûment payée à la Commission – Article 266 TFUE – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers.#Affaire T-661/24.
Rozsudek Tribunálu (třetího senátu) ze dne 15. července 2026.#Česká republika v. Evropská komise.#Mimosmluvní odpovědnost Unie – EZZF a EZFRV – Rozsudek, kterým se zrušuje rozhodnutí Komise o vyloučení některých výdajů vynaložených členskými státy v rámci EZZF a EZFRV z unijního financování – Vrácení neoprávněně vybrané částky Komisí – Odmítnutí Komise zaplatit úroky z přeplatku – Povinnost zaplatit úroky – Paušální náhrada ztráty požitků plynoucích z částky neoprávněně vyplacené Komisi – Článek 266 SFEU – Dostatečně závažné porušení právní normy přiznávající práva jednotlivcům.#Věc T-661/24.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.
Decisione (PESC) 2026/1781 del comitato politico e di sicurezza, del 15 luglio 2026, relativa alla nomina del capo della missione dell’Unione europea sullo Stato di diritto in Kosovo) (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
official_journal · 15 July 2026 · Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2026/1781 of 15 July 2026 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
Besluit (GBVB) 2026/1781 van het Politiek en Veiligheidscomité van 15 juli 2026 tot benoeming van het hoofd van de rechtsstaatmissie van de Europese Unie in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
official_journal · 15 July 2026 · Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2026/1781 of 15 July 2026 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
Decizia (PESC) 2026/1781 a Comitetului politic și de securitate din 15 iulie 2026 privind numirea șefului misiunii Uniunii Europene de sprijinire a supremației legii în Kosovo(EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
official_journal · 15 July 2026 · Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2026/1781 of 15 July 2026 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
Decyzja Komitetu Politycznego i Bezpieczeństwa (WPZiB) 2026/1781 z dnia 15 lipca 2026 r. w sprawie mianowania szefa misji Unii Europejskiej w zakresie praworządności w Kosowie (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)
official_journal · 15 July 2026 · Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2026/1781 of 15 July 2026 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2026)