Nitrogen

Records

Documents

Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.

• Lijst van vragen over de uitspraak Hof van Justitie over programma aanpak stikstof (PAS) (Kamerstuk 32670-141).

  Lijst van vragen · 19 December 2018 · Uitspraak Hof van Justitie over programma aanpak stikstof (PAS)

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (ένατο πενταμελές τμήμα) της 13ης Δεκεμβρίου 2018.#Ville de Paris και Ville de Bruxelles και Ayuntamiento de Madrid κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Περιβάλλον – Kανονισμός (ΕΕ) 2016/646 – Ρυπογόνες εκπομπές από ελαφρά επιβατηγά και εμπορικά οχήματα (Euro 6) – Καθορισμός, για τις εκπομπές οξειδίων του αζώτου, μη υπερβάσιμων τιμών (ΝΤΕ) στο πλαίσιο δοκιμών υπό πραγματικές συνθήκες οδήγησης (RDE) – Προσφυγή ακυρώσεως – Εξουσίες δημοτικής αρχής για τη λήψη μέτρων περιορισμού της κυκλοφορίας ορισμένων οχημάτων με σκοπό την προστασία του περιβάλλοντος – Άμεσος επηρεασμός – Παραδεκτό – Αναρμοδιότητα της Επιτροπής – Συμμόρφωση προς υπέρτερους νομικούς κανόνες – Καθορισμός των διαχρονικών αποτελεσμάτων της ακυρώσεως – Εξωσυμβατική ευθύνη – Χρηματική ικανοποίηση λόγω προσβολής της εικόνας και της φήμης.#Συνεκδικασθείσες υποθέσεις T-339/16, T-352/16 και Τ-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudek Tribunálu (devátého rozšířeného senátu) ze dne 13. prosince 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles a Ayuntamiento de Madrid v. Evropská komise.#Životní prostředí – Nařízení (EU) 2016/646 – Emise znečišťujících látek z lehkých osobních vozidel a z užitkových vozidel (Euro 6) – Stanovení mezních hodnot emisí oxidů dusíku, které nelze překročit (NTE) při zkouškách emisí v reálném provozu (RDE) – Žaloba na neplatnost – Pravomoc orgánu obce v oblasti životního prostředí spočívající v omezení provozu některých vozidel – Přímé dotčení – Přípustnost – Nedostatek pravomoci Komise – Dodržování právních norem vyšší právní síly – Úprava časových účinků zrušení – Mimosmluvní odpovědnost – Náprava tvrzeného poškození dobrého jména a pověsti.#Spojené věci T-339/16, T-352/16 a T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Törvényszék ítélete (kibővített kilencedik tanács), 2018. december 13.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles és Ayuntamiento de Madrid kontra Európai Bizottság.#Környezet – (EU) 2016/646 rendelet – A könnyű személy‑ és haszongépjárművek szennyezőanyag‑kibocsátásai (Euro 6) – A nitrogén‑oxid‑kibocsátások nem túllépendő értékeinek (NTE‑értékek) meghatározása valós vezetési feltételek melletti vizsgálatok (RDE‑vizsgálatok) során – Megsemmisítés iránti kereset – Az önkormányzati hatóság egyes járművek közlekedésének korlátozására vonatkozó jogköre a környezetvédelem terén – Közvetlen érintettség – Elfogadhatóság – A Bizottság hatáskörének hiánya – A magasabb szintű jogi normák tiszteletben tartása – A megsemmisítés joghatásainak időbeli módosítása – Szerződésen kívüli felelősség – Az imázst és a jóhírnevet ért állítólagos kár megtérítése.#T-339/16., T-352/16. és T-391/16. sz. egyesített ügyek.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2018 m. gruodžio 13 d. Bendrojo Teismo (devintoji išplėstinė kolegija) sprendimas.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles ir Ayuntamiento de Madrid prieš Europos Komisiją.#Aplinka – Reglamentas (ES) 2016/646 – Išmetamieji teršalai iš lengvųjų keleivinių ir komercinių transporto priemonių (euro 6) – Išmetamų azoto oksidų kiekio neviršytinų verčių (NTE) nustatymas atliekant įprastinėmis važiavimo sąlygomis išmetamo teršalų kiekio (ĮVSITK) bandymus – Ieškinys dėl panaikinimo – Savivaldybės institucijos, veikiančios aplinkos apsaugos srityje, įgaliojimai riboti tam tikrų transporto priemonių eismą – Tiesioginė sąsaja – Priimtinumas – Komisijos įgaliojimų nebuvimas – Viršesnių teisės normų laikymasis – Panaikinimo padarinių išdėstymas laiko atžvilgiu – Deliktinė atsakomybė – Tariamos žalos įvaizdžiui ir reputacijai atlyginimas.#Sujungtos bylos T-339/16, T-352/16 ir T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a noua extinsă) din 13 decembrie 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles și Ayuntamiento de Madrid împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Mediu – Regulamentul (UE) 2016/646 – Emisiile poluante provenind de la vehiculele ușoare pentru pasageri și de la vehiculele ușoare comerciale (Euro 6) – Stabilirea, pentru emisiile de oxizi de azot, a unor valori de „nedepășire” (NTE), în timpul încercărilor în condiții reale de condus (RDE) – Acțiune în anulare – Competențele unei autorități locale în materie de protecție a mediului de a limita circulația anumitor vehicule – Afectare directă – Admisibilitate – Necompetenţa Comisiei – Respectarea normelor juridice superioare – Ajustarea în timp a efectelor unei anulări – Răspundere extracontractuală – Repararea unui pretins prejudiciu de imagine și de reputație.#Cauzele conexate T-339/16, T-352/16 și T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Splošnega sodišča (deveti razširjeni senat) z dne 13. decembra 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles in Ayuntamiento de Madrid proti Evropski komisiji.#Okolje – Uredba (EU) 2016/646 – Emisije onesnaževal iz lahkih potniških in gospodarskih vozil (Euro 6) – Določitev vrednosti emisij dušikovih oksidov, ki se ne smejo preseči (NTE), med preskusi pod dejanskimi pogoji pri vožnji (RDE) – Ničnostna tožba – Pristojnosti občinskega organa na področju varstva okolja, da omeji promet nekaterih vozil – Neposredno nanašanje – Dopustnost – Nepristojnost Komisije – Spoštovanje nadrejenih pravnih predpisov – Sprememba časovnih učinkov razveljavitve – Nepogodbena odgovornost – Povrnitev zatrjevane škode za podobo in ugled.#Združene zadeve T-339/16, T-352/16 in T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (deviata rozšírená komora) z 13. decembra 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles a Ayuntamiento de Madrid proti Európskej komisii.#Životné prostredie – Nariadenie (ES) č. 2016/646 – Emisie znečisťujúcich látok z ľahkých osobných a úžitkových vozidiel (Euro 6) – Stanovenie neprekročiteľných limitných hodnôt (NTE) emisií oxidov dusíka počas skúšok pri skutočnej jazde (RDE) – Žaloba o neplatnosť – Právomoc orgánu miestnej štátnej správy príslušného pre ochranu životného prostredia obmedziť premávku určitých vozidiel – Priama dotknutosť – Prípustnosť – Nedostatok právomoci Komisie – Dodržanie vyšších právnych noriem – Prispôsobenie účinkov vyhlásenia neplatnosti z hľadiska času – Mimozmluvná zodpovednosť – Náhrada údajnej ujmy na dobrom mene a povesti.#Spojené veci T-339/16, T-352/16 a T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Gerecht (Negende kamer – uitgebreid) van 13 december 2018.#Ville de Paris, Stad Brussel en Ayuntamiento de Madrid tegen Europese Commissie.#Milieu – Verordening (EU) 2016/646 – Vervuilende emissies van lichte personen‑ en bedrijfsvoertuigen (Euro 6) – Vaststelling, wat de uitstoot van stikstofoxide betreft, van de waarden die niet mogen worden overschreden (not‑to‑exceed – NTE) bij tests die worden uitgevoerd in reële rijomstandigheden (Real Driving Emissions – RDE) – Beroep tot nietigverklaring – Bevoegdheden van met milieubescherming belaste gemeentelijke autoriteiten om voor bepaalde voertuigen verkeersbeperkende maatregelen op te leggen – Rechtstreekse geraaktheid – Ontvankelijkheid – Onbevoegdheid van de Commissie – Eerbiediging van hogere rechtsnormen – Werking in de tijd van de gevolgen van een nietigverklaring – Niet-contractuele aansprakelijkheid – Vergoeding van beweerde imago‑ en reputatieschade.#Gevoegde zaken T-339/16, T-352/16 en T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (Id-Disa’ Awla Estiża) tat-13 ta’ Diċembru 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles u Ayuntamiento de Madrid vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Ambjent – Regolament (UE) 2016/646 – Emissjonijiet ta’ sustanzi niġġiesa tal-vetturi ħfief għall-passiġġieri u minn vetturi kummerċjali (Euro 6) – Iffissar, għall-emissjonijiet ta’ ossidi tan-nitroġenu, ta’ valuri li ma għandhomx jinqabżu (NTE), matul testijiet f’kundizzjonijiet ta’ sewqan reali (RDE) – Rikors għal annullament – Setgħat ta’ awtorità muniċipali dwar il-protezzjoni tal-ambjent li jillimitaw iċ-ċirkulazzjoni ta’ ċerti vetturi – Inċidenza diretta – Ammissibbiltà – Nuqqas ta’ kompetenza tal-Kummissjoni – Rispett tar-regoli ġuridiċi superjuri – Modulazzjoni fiż-żmien tal-effetti ta’ annullament – Responsabbiltà mhux kuntrattwali – Kumpens għal ħsara allegata ta’ immaġni u ta’ reputazzjoni.#Kawżi magħquda T-339/16, T-352/16 u T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Vispārējās tiesas spriedums (devītā palāta paplašinātā sastāvā), 2018. gada 13. decembris.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles un Ayuntamiento de Madrid pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Vide – Regula (ES) 2016/646 – Piesārņojošās emisijas no vieglajiem pasažieru un vieglajiem komerciālajiem transportlīdzekļiem (“Euro 6”) – Slāpekļa oksīdu emisiju nepārsniedzamo vērtību (NTE) noteikšana, testējot reālos braukšanas apstākļos (RDE) – Prasība atcelt tiesību aktu – Pašvaldības vides aizsardzības iestādes pilnvaras ierobežot atsevišķu transportlīdzekļu dalību satiksmē – Tiešs skārums – Pieņemamība – Komisijas kompetences neesamība – Tiesību normu ar augstāku juridisko spēku ievērošana – Atcelšanas iedarbības pielāgošana laikā – Ārpuslīgumiskā atbildība – Kaitējuma, kas esot nodarīts tēlam un reputācijai, atlīdzināšana.#Apvienotās lietas T-339/16, T-352/16 un T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza del Tribunale (Nona Sezione ampliata) del 13 dicembre 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles e Ayuntamiento de Madrid contro Commissione europea.#Ambiente – Regolamento (UE) 2016/646 – Emissioni inquinanti dai veicoli passeggeri e commerciali leggeri (EUR 6) – Fissazione, per le emissioni di ossidi di azoto, dei valori limite (NTE), durante le prove relative alle emissioni in condizioni reali di guida (RDE) – Ricorso di annullamento – Poteri di un’autorità comunale in materia di tutela dell’ambiente di limitare la circolazione di taluni veicoli – Incidenza diretta – Ricevibilità – Incompetenza della Commissione – Rispetto delle norme giuridiche di rango superiore – Modulazione nel tempo degli effetti di un annullamento – Responsabilità extracontrattuale – Risarcimento di un asserito danno all’immagine e alla reputazione.#Cause riunite T-339/16, T-352/16 e T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Općeg suda (deveto prošireno vijeće) od 13. prosinca 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles i Ayuntamiento de Madrid protiv Europske komisije.#Okoliš – Uredba (EU) 2016/646 – Emisije onečišćujućih tvari iz lakih osobnih i gospodarskih vozila (Euro 6) – Utvrđivanje vrijednosti koje se ne smiju prekoračiti (NTE) za emisije dušikovih oksida pri ispitivanju stvarnih emisija tijekom vožnje (RDE) – Tužbe za poništenje – Ovlasti općinskog tijela u području zaštite okoliša da ograniči promet određenih vozila – Izravni utjecaj – Dopuštenost – Nenadležnost Komisije – Poštovanje viših pravnih pravila – Vremenska prilagodba učinaka poništenja – Izvanugovorna odgovornost – Naknada navodne štete imidžu i ugledu.#Spojeni predmeti T-339/16, T-352/16 i T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen tuomio (laajennettu yhdeksäs jaosto) 13.12.2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles ja Ayuntamiento de Madrid vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Ympäristö – Asetus (EU) 2016/646 – Kevyiden henkilö- ja hyötyajoneuvojen päästöt (Euro 6) – Päästöjen enimmäisarvojen (NTE) määrittäminen typen oksidien päästöille todellisissa ajo-olosuhteissa syntyvien päästöjen (RDE) testausmenettelyssä – Kumoamiskanne – Kunnallisen ympäristönsuojeluviranomaisen toimivalta rajoittaa määrättyjen ajoneuvojen käyttöä – Kantajia suoraan koskeva toimi – Tutkittavaksi ottaminen – Komission toimivallan puuttuminen – Ylempien oikeussääntöjen noudattaminen – Kumoamisen ajallisten vaikutusten mukauttaminen – Sopimussuhteen ulkopuolinen vastuu – Väitteiden mukaan imagolle ja maineelle aiheutuneen vahingon korvaaminen.#Yhdistetyt asiat T-339/16, T-352/16 ja T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rettens dom (Niende Udvidede Afdeling) af 13. december 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles og Ayuntamiento de Madrid mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Miljø – forordning (EU) 2016/646 – forurenende emissioner fra lette personbiler og lette erhvervskøretøjer (Euro 6) – fastsættelse af NTE-værdier (not-to-exceed) for emissioner af nitrogenoxider under prøvninger ved faktisk kørsel (RDE – real driving emission) – annullationssøgsmål – en kommunal myndigheds beføjelser på miljøbeskyttelsesområdet til at begrænse kørsel med visse køretøjer – umiddelbart berørt – antagelse til realitetsbehandling – Kommissionens manglende kompetence – overholdelse af trinhøjere retsregler – tidsmæssig tilpasning af virkningerne af en annullation – ansvar uden for kontraktforhold – erstatning for hævdet skade på omdømme og anseelse.#Forenede sager T-339/16, T-352/16 og T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Общия съд (девети разширен състав) от 13 декември 2018 г.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles и Ayuntamiento de Madrid срещу Европейска комисия.#Околна среда — Регламент (ЕС) 2016/646 — Замърсяващи емисии от леки превозни средства за превоз на пътници и товари (Евро 6) — Определяне на непревишавани стойности (NTE) за емисиите на азотни оксиди при изпитвания в реални условия на движение (RDE) — Жалба за отмяна — Правомощия на общински орган в областта на опазването на околната среда да ограничи движението на някои превозни средства — Пряко засягане — Допустимост — Липса на компетентност на Комисията — Спазване на правните норми от по-висок ранг — Ограничаване на действието на отмяната във времето — Извъндоговорна отговорност — Поправяне на твърдяна вреда, изразена в уронване на имиджа и на доброто име.#Съединени дела T-339/16, T-352/16 и T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Wyrok Sądu (dziewiąta izba w składzie powiększonym) z dnia 13 grudnia 2018 r.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles i Ayuntamiento de Madrid przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Środowisko naturalne – Rozporządzenie (UE) 2016/646 – Emisja zanieczyszczeń pochodzących z lekkich pojazdów pasażerskich i użytkowych (Euro 6) – Określenie nieprzekraczalnych wartości (NTE) dla emisji tlenków azotu podczas badań w rzeczywistych warunkach jazdy (RDE) – Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności – Uprawnienia gminnego organu ochrony środowiska do ograniczenia ruchu niektórych pojazdów – Bezpośrednie oddziaływanie – Dopuszczalność – Brak kompetencji Komisji – Przestrzeganie norm prawnych wyższego rzędu – Dostosowanie w czasie skutków stwierdzenia nieważności – Odpowiedzialność pozaumowna – Naprawienie zarzucanej szkody wizerunkowej i szkody wynikającej z naruszenia dobrego imienia.#Sprawy połączone T-339/16, T-352/16 i T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Nona Secção alargada) de 13 de dezembro de 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles e Ayuntamiento de Madrid contra Comissão Europeia.#Ambiente — Regulamento (UE) 2016/646 — Emissões poluentes dos veículos ligeiros de passageiros e comerciais (Euro 6) — Fixação, para as emissões de óxidos de azoto, dos valores a não ultrapassar (NTE), nos ensaios em condições reais de condução (RDE) — Recurso de anulação — Poderes de uma autoridade municipal em matéria de proteção do ambiente para limitar a circulação de determinados veículos — Afetação direta — Admissibilidade — Incompetência da Comissão — Respeito por normas jurídicas superiores — Ajustamento dos efeitos de uma anulação no tempo — Responsabilidade extracontratual — Indemnização por um alegado dano em termos de imagem e de reputação.#Processos apensos T-339/16, T-352/16 e T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichts (Neunte erweiterte Kammer) vom 13. Dezember 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles und Ayuntamiento de Madrid gegen Europäische Kommission.#Umwelt – Verordnung (EU) 2016/646 – Schadstoffemissionen von leichten Personenkraftwagen und Nutzfahrzeugen (Euro 6) – Festsetzung von verbindlichen Grenzwerten (NTE‑Werten) für die Stickoxidemissionen bei Prüfungen im praktischen Fahrbetrieb (RDE) – Nichtigkeitsklagen – Befugnis einer kommunalen Behörde im Bereich des Umweltschutzes, den Verkehr bestimmter Fahrzeuge zu beschränken – Unmittelbare Betroffenheit – Zulässigkeit – Unzuständigkeit der Kommission – Beachtung höherrangiger Rechtsnormen – Zeitliche Staffelung der Wirkungen einer Nichtigerklärung – Außervertragliche Haftung – Ersatz einer angeblichen Image- und Rufschädigung.#Verbundene Rechtssachen T-339/16, T-352/16 und T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Üldkohtu otsus (üheksas koda laiendatud koosseisus), 13.12.2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles ja Ayuntamiento de Madrid versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Keskkond – Määrus (EL) 2016/646 – Väikeste sõiduautode ja kommertsveokite (Euro 6) saasteainete heide – Tegelikus liikluses tekkivate heitkoguste (RDE) katsete käigus tekkiva lämmastikoksiidide heite mitteületatavate piirmäärade (NTE) kehtestamine – Tühistamishagi – Omavalitsusüksuse pädevus piirata keskkonnakaitse valdkonnas teatavate sõidukite liiklust – Otsene puutumus – Vastuvõetavus – Komisjoni pädevuse puudumine – Kõrgema astme õigusnormide järgimine – Tühistamise tagajärgede ajalise kehtivuse määratlemine – Lepinguväline vastutus – Kuvandile ja mainele väidetavalt tekitatud kahju hüvitamine.#Liidetud kohtuasjad T-339/16, T-352/16 ja T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tribunalens dom (nionde avdelningen i utökad sammansättning) av den 13 december 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles och Ayuntamiento de Madrid mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Miljö – Förordning (EU) 2016/646 – Utsläpp från lätta personbilar och lätta nyttofordon (Euro 6) – Fastställande, såvitt avser kväveoxidutsläpp, av värden som inte får överskridas (not-to-exceed (NTE)) vid provning vid verklig körning (real driving emission (RDE)) – Talan om ogiltigförklaring – Kommunala myndigheters behörighet i fråga om miljöskydd att införa trafikbegränsningar för vissa fordon – Villkoret direkt berörd – Upptagande till sakprövning – Kommissionen saknar behörighet – Iakttagande av överordnade rättsregler – Anpassning i tiden av verkningarna av en dom om ogiltigförklaring – Utomobligatoriskt skadeståndsansvar – Ersättning för påstådd skada på renommé och anseende.#Förenade målen T-339/16, T-352/16 och T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre élargie) du 13 décembre 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles et Ayuntamiento de Madrid contre Commission européenne.#Environnement – Règlement (UE) 2016/646 – Émissions polluantes des véhicules particuliers et utilitaires légers (Euro 6) – Fixation, pour les émissions d’oxydes d’azote, des valeurs à ne pas dépasser (NTE), lors des essais en conditions de conduite réelles (RDE) – Recours en annulation – Pouvoirs d’une autorité communale en matière de protection de l’environnement de limiter la circulation de certains véhicules – Affectation directe – Recevabilité – Incompétence de la Commission – Respect des normes juridiques supérieures – Modulation dans le temps des effets d’une annulation – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réparation d’un préjudice allégué d’image et de réputation.#Affaires jointes T-339/16, T-352/16 et T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Novena ampliada) de 13 de diciembre de 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles y Ayuntamiento de Madrid contra Comisión Europea.#Medio ambiente — Reglamento (UE) 2016/646 — Emisiones contaminantes procedentes de turismos y vehículos comerciales ligeros (Euro 6) — Fijación, con respecto a las emisiones de óxidos de nitrógeno, de valores no sobrepasables (NTE) en los ensayos en condiciones reales de conducción (RDE) — Recurso de anulación — Potestades de una autoridad municipal en materia de protección del medio ambiente para limitar la circulación de determinados vehículos — Afectación directa — Admisibilidad — Incompetencia de la Comisión — Respeto de las normas jurídicas de rango superior — Modulación en el tiempo de los efectos de una anulación — Responsabilidad extracontractual — Reparación de un perjuicio alegado de imagen y reputación.#Asuntos acumulados T-339/16, T-352/16 y T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  judgment · 13 December 2018 · Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 December 2018.#Ville de Paris, Ville de Bruxelles and Ayuntamiento de Madrid v European Commission.#Environment — Regulation (EU) 2016/646 — Pollutant emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) — Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests — Action for annulment — Powers of a municipal authority in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles — Direct concern — Admissibility — Lack of competence on the part of the Commission — Compliance with higher-ranking legal rules — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment — Non-contractual liability — Compensation for the alleged harm to image and reputation.#Joined Cases T-339/16, T-352/16 and T-391/16.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Uitspraak Hof van Justitie over programma aanpak stikstof (PAS)

  Brief regering · 19 November 2018 · Uitspraak Hof van Justitie over programma aanpak stikstof (PAS)

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 7ης Νοεμβρίου 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA και Vereniging Leefmilieu κατά College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg και College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Αιτήσεις του Raad van State για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Οδηγία 92/43/ΕΟΚ – Διατήρηση των φυσικών οικοτόπων καθώς και της άγριας πανίδας και χλωρίδας – Ειδικές ζώνες διατήρησης – Άρθρο 6 – Δέουσα εκτίμηση των επιπτώσεων σχεδίου στον οικείο τόπο – Εθνικό πρόγραμμα για την αντιμετώπιση των εναποθέσεων αζώτου – Έννοια των όρων “σχέδιο” και “δέουσα εκτίμηση” – Συνολική εκτίμηση, σε προγενέστερο στάδιο, των ατομικών εγκρίσεων των γεωργικών εκμεταλλεύσεων που προκαλούν τέτοιες εναποθέσεις αζώτου.#Συνεκδικασθείσες υποθέσεις C-293/17 και C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 7 ноември 2018 г.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA и Vereniging Leefmilieu срещу College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg и College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Преюдициални запитвания, отправени от Raad van State.#Преюдициално запитване — Директива 92/43/ЕИО — Опазване на естествените местообитания и на дивата флора и фауна — Специални защитени зони — Член 6 — Подходяща оценка на въздействието на план или проект върху дадена територия — Национална програма за борба с азотните отлагания — Понятия „проект“ и „подходяща оценка“ — Обща предварителна оценка на отделните разрешения на земеделски стопанства, които генерират такива отлагания.#Съединени дела C-293/17 и C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tas-7 ta’ Novembru 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA u Vereniging Leefmilieu vs College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg u College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Talbiet għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mir-Raad van State.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Direttiva 92/43/KEE – Konservazzjoni tal-habitats naturali kif ukoll tal-fawna u l-flora selvaġġa – Żoni speċjali ta’ konservazzjoni – Artikolu 6 – Evalwazzjoni xierqa tal-effetti ta’ pjan jew ta’ proġett fuq sit – Programm nazzjonali għall-ġlieda kontra d-depożiti ta’ nitroġenu – Kunċetti ta’ ‘proġett’ u ta’ ‘evalwazzjoni xierqa’ – Evalwazzjoni globali tal-awtorizzazzjonijiet individwali ta’ azjendi agrikoli li jiġġeneraw tali depożiti.#Kawżi magħquda C-293/17 u C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 7 november 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA och Vereniging Leefmilieu mot College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg och College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Raad van State.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Direktiv 92/43/EEG – Bevarande av livsmiljöer samt vilda djur och växter – Särskilda bevarandeområden – Artikel 6 – Lämplig bedömning av en plans eller ett projekts konsekvenser för ett område – Nationellt program för bekämpning av kvävedepositioner – Begreppen ”projekt” och ”lämplig bedömning” – Helhetsbedömning före utfärdandet av individuella tillstånd för att bedriva jordbruk som genererar sådana depositioner.#Förenade målen C-293/17 och C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2018 m. lapkričio 7 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA ir Vereniging Leefmilieu prieš College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg ir College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Raad van State prašymai priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Direktyva 92/43/EEB – Natūralių buveinių ir laukinės faunos bei floros apsauga – Specialios saugomos teritorijos – 6 straipsnis – Tinkamas plano ar projekto poveikio teritorijai įvertinimas – Nacionalinė azoto nuosėdų kiekio mažinimo programa – Sąvokos „projektas“ ir „tinkamas poveikio įvertinimas“ – Tokias nuosėdas sukeliančioms žemės ūkio valdoms išduodamų individualių leidimų bendras išankstinis vertinimas.#Sujungtos bylos C-293/17 ir C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 7. novembra 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA in Vereniging Leefmilieu proti College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg in College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ju je vložilo Raad van State.#Predhodno odločanje – Direktiva 92/43/EGS – Ohranjanje naravnih habitatov ter prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst – Posebna ohranitvena območja – Člen 6 – Ustrezna presoja posledic načrta ali projekta za neko območje – Nacionalni program boja proti usedlinam dušika – Pojma ‚projekt‘ in ‚ustrezna presoja‘ – Predhodna splošna presoja posamičnih dovoljenj za kmetijska gospodarstva, ki povzročajo take usedline.#Združeni zadevi C-293/17 in C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 7 noiembrie 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA și Vereniging Leefmilieu împotriva College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg și a College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Cereri de decizie preliminară formulate de Raad van State.#Trimitere preliminară – Directiva 92/43/CEE – Conservarea habitatelor naturale și a speciilor de faună și floră sălbatică – Arii speciale de conservare – Articolul 6 – Evaluare corespunzătoare a efectelor unui plan sau ale unui proiect asupra unui sit – Program național de combatere a depunerilor de azot – Noțiunile „proiect” și „evaluare corespunzătoare” – Evaluare globală anterioară aprobărilor individuale ale unor exploatații agricole care provoacă astfel de depuneri.#Cauzele conexate C-293/17 și C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 7 listopada 2018 r.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA i Vereniging Leefmilieu przeciwko College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg i College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożone przez Raad van State.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Dyrektywa 92/43/EWG – Ochrona siedlisk przyrodniczych oraz dzikiej fauny i flory – Specjalne obszary ochrony – Artykuł 6 – Odpowiednia ocena skutków planu lub przedsięwzięcia dla terenu – Krajowy program zwalczania depozycji azotu – Pojęcia „przedsięwzięcia” i „odpowiedniej oceny” – Globalna ocena na etapie wcześniejszym indywidualnych zezwoleń udzielanych gospodarstwom rolnym powodującym depozycje.#Sprawy połączone C-293/17 i C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2018. gada 7. novembris.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA un Vereniging Leefmilieu pret College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg un College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Raad van State lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Direktīva 92/43/EEK – Dabisko dzīvotņu, savvaļas faunas un floras aizsardzība – Īpaši aizsargājamas dabas teritorijas – 6. pants – Plāna vai projekta ietekmes uz teritoriju attiecīgs novērtējums – Valsts programma cīņai pret slāpekļa nosēdumiem – Jēdzieni “projekts” un “attiecīgs novērtējums” – Vispārējs novērtējums pirms individuālu atļauju izsniegšanas lauku saimniecībām, kuras rada slāpekļa nosēdumus.#Apvienotās lietas C-293/17 un C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 7 november 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA en Vereniging Leefmilieu tegen College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg en College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland en Stichting Werkgroep Behoud de Peel tegen College van gedeputeerde staten van Noord-Brabant.#Verzoeken van de Raad van State (Nederland) om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Richtlijn 92/43/EEG – Instandhouding van de natuurlijke habitats en van de wilde flora en fauna – Speciale beschermingszones – Artikel 6 – Passende beoordeling van de gevolgen van een plan of project voor een gebied – Nationaal programma voor de aanpak van stikstof – Begrippen ,project’ en ,passende beoordeling’ – Integrale beoordeling voordat individueel toestemming wordt verleend aan agrarische bedrijven die stikstofdepositie veroorzaken.#Gevoegde zaken C-293/17 en C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 7 novembre 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA et Vereniging Leefmilieu contre College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg et College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par Raad van State.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Zones spéciales de conservation – Article 6 – Évaluation appropriée des incidences d’un plan ou d’un projet sur un site – Programme national de lutte contre les dépôts d’azote – Notions de “projet” et d’“évaluation appropriée” – Évaluation globale en amont des agréments individuels d’exploitations agricoles engendrant de tels dépôts.#Affaires jointes C-293/17 et C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 7 novembre 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA e Vereniging Leefmilieu contro College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg e College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Domande di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposte dal Raad van State.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Direttiva 92/43/CEE – Conservazione degli habitat naturali e della flora e della fauna selvatiche – Zone speciali di conservazione – Articolo 6 – Opportuna valutazione dell’incidenza di un piano o di un progetto su un sito – Programma nazionale di gestione dei depositi di azoto – Nozioni di “progetto” e di “opportuna valutazione” – Valutazione globale a monte delle autorizzazioni individuali di aziende agricole che generano tali depositi.#Cause riunite C-293/17 e C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) zo 7. novembra 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA a Vereniging Leefmilieu proti College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg a College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Raad van State.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Smernica 92/43/EHS – Ochrana prirodzených biotopov a voľne žijúcich živočíchov a rastlín – Osobitne chránené územia – Článok 6 – Primerané posúdenie vplyvov plánu alebo projektu na chránenú lokalitu – Národný program boja proti depozíciám dusíka – Pojmy ‚projekt‘ a ‚primerané posúdenie‘ – Celkové posúdenie pred individuálnymi povoleniami poľnohospodárskych podnikov spôsobujúcich také depozície.#Spojené veci C-293/17 a C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 7. November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA und Vereniging Leefmilieu gegen College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg und College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Raad van State.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Richtlinie 92/43/EWG – Erhaltung der natürlichen Lebensräume sowie der wildlebenden Tiere und Pflanzen – Besondere Schutzgebiete – Art. 6 – Prüfung der Verträglichkeit eines Planes oder Projekts für ein Gebiet – Nationales Programm zur Bekämpfung von Stickstoffablagerungen – Begriffe ‚Projekt‘ und ,angemessene Prüfung‘ – Vorherige Gesamtprüfung der Einzelgenehmigungen für solche Ablagerungen verursachende landwirtschaftliche Betriebe.#Verbundene Rechtssachen C-293/17 und C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2018. november 7.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA és társai kontra College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg és társai.#A Raad van State (Hollandia) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelmek.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – 92/43/EGK irányelv – A természetes élőhelyek, valamint a vadon élő állatok és növények védelme – Különleges természetmegőrzési területek – 6. cikk – A terv vagy projekt természeti területre gyakorolt hatásainak megfelelő vizsgálata – A nitrogénlerakódások elleni küzdelmet szolgáló nemzeti program – A »projekt« és a »megfelelő vizsgálat« fogalma – Az ilyen lerakódásokat okozó mezőgazdasági üzemek egyedi engedélyezését megelőző globális vizsgálat.#C-293/17. és C-294/17. sz. egyesített ügyek.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 7 de novembro de 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA e Vereniging Leefmilieu contra College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg e College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Pedidos de decisão prejudicial apresentados pelo Raad van State.#Reenvio prejudicial — Diretiva 92/43/CEE — Preservação dos habitats naturais e da fauna e da flora selvagens — Zonas especiais de conservação — Artigo 6.o — Avaliação adequada das incidências de um plano ou projeto sobre um sítio — Programa nacional de abordagem das deposições de azoto — Conceitos de “projeto” e de “avaliação adequada” — Avaliação global a montante das autorizações individuais de explorações agrícolas que provocam essas deposições.#Processos apensos C-293/17 e C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 7 de noviembre de 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA y Vereniging Leefmilieu contre College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg y College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Peticiones de decisión prejudicial planteadas por el Raad van State.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Directiva 92/43/CEE — Conservación de los hábitats naturales y de la fauna y flora silvestres — Zonas especiales de conservación — Artículo 6 — Adecuada evaluación de las repercusiones sobre un lugar de un plan o proyecto — Programa nacional de lucha contra las deposiciones de nitrógeno — Conceptos de “proyecto” y “adecuada evaluación” — Evaluación global previa de las autorizaciones individuales de explotaciones agrícolas que generan esas deposiciones.#Asuntos acumulados C-293/17 y C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 7. listopadu 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA a další v. College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg a další.#Žádosti o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podané Raad van State.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Směrnice 92/43/EHS – Ochrana přírodních stanovišť, volně žijících živočichů a planě rostoucích rostlin – Zvláštní oblasti ochrany – Článek 6 – Odpovídající posouzení důsledků plánu nebo projektu na lokalitu – Vnitrostátní program boje s ukládáním dusíku – Pojmy ‚projekt‘ a ‚odpovídající posouzení‘ – Globální posouzení ex ante individuálních povolení pro zemědělské podniky, které způsobují takové ukládání.#Spojené věci C-293/17 a C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 7. studenoga 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA i Vereniging Leefmilieu protiv College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg i College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Raad van State.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Direktiva 92/43/EEZ – Očuvanje prirodnih staništa i divlje faune i flore – Posebna područja očuvanja – Članak 6. – Procjena prihvatljivosti utjecaja plana ili projekta na područje – Nacionalni program za borbu protiv taloženja dušika – Pojmovi ‚projekt’ i ‚procjena prihvatljivosti’ – Prethodna sveukupna procjena pojedinačnih odobrenja za poljoprivredna gospodarstva koja uzrokuju takva taloženja.#Spojeni predmeti C-293/17 i C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 7. november 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA og Vereniging Leefmilieu mod College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg og College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Anmodninger om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Raad van State.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – direktiv 92/43/EØF – bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter – særlige bevaringsområder – artikel 6 – vurdering af en plans eller et projekts virkninger på en lokalitet – nationalt program til bekæmpelse af kvælstofaflejringer – begreberne »projekt« og »passende vurdering« – forudgående helhedsvurdering af individuelle godkendelser til landbrugsbedrifter, som forårsager sådanne aflejringer.#Forenede sager C-293/17 og C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 7.11.2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA ja Vereniging Leefmilieu versus College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg ja College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg ja College van gedeputeerde staten Gelderland.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Raad van State.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Direktiiv 92/43/EMÜ – Looduslike elupaikade ning loodusliku loomastiku ja taimestiku kaitse – Erikaitsealad – Artikkel 6 – Kava või projektiga alale avaldatava mõju asjakohane hindamine – Lämmastiksaaste vastase võitluse riiklik programm – Mõisted „projekt“ ja „asjakohane hindamine“ – Sellist saastet tekitavate põllumajandusettevõtete individuaalsete lubade eelnev üldine hindamine.#Kohtuasi C-293/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 7.11.2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA ja Vereniging Leefmilieu vastaan College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg ja College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Raad van Staten esittämät ennakkoratkaisupyynnöt.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Direktiivi 92/43/ETY – Luontotyyppien sekä luonnonvaraisen eläimistön ja kasviston suojelu – Erityisten suojelutoimien alueet – 6 artikla – Asianmukainen arviointi suunnitelman tai hankkeen vaikutuksista alueeseen – Kansallinen ohjelma typpilaskeumien torjumiseksi – Käsitteet ”hanke” ja ”asianmukainen arviointi” – Kokonaisvaltainen ennakkoarviointi, kun annetaan erillinen hyväksyntä tällaisia laskeumia aiheuttavalle maatalousyritykselle.#Yhdistetyt asiat C-293/17 ja C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  judgment · 7 November 2018 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Conclusões da advogada-geral J. Kokott apresentadas em 25 de julho de 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA e Vereniging Leefmilieu contra College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg e College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Pedidos de decisão prejudicial apresentados pelo Raad van State.#Reenvio prejudicial — Diretiva 92/43/CEE — Preservação dos habitats naturais e da fauna e da flora selvagens — Zonas especiais de conservação — Artigo 6.o — Avaliação adequada das incidências de um plano ou projeto sobre um sítio — Programa nacional de abordagem das deposições de azoto — Conceitos de “projeto” e de “avaliação adequada” — Avaliação global a montante das autorizações individuais de explorações agrícolas que provocam essas deposições.#Processos apensos C-293/17 e C-294/17.

  judgment · 25 July 2018 · Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 July 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Návrhy prednesené 25. júla 2018 – generálna advokátka J. Kokott.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA a Vereniging Leefmilieu proti College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg a College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Raad van State.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Smernica 92/43/EHS – Ochrana prirodzených biotopov a voľne žijúcich živočíchov a rastlín – Osobitne chránené územia – Článok 6 – Primerané posúdenie vplyvov plánu alebo projektu na chránenú lokalitu – Národný program boja proti depozíciám dusíka – Pojmy ‚projekt‘ a ‚primerané posúdenie‘ – Celkové posúdenie pred individuálnymi povoleniami poľnohospodárskych podnikov spôsobujúcich také depozície.#Spojené veci C-293/17 a C-294/17.

  judgment · 25 July 2018 · Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 July 2018.#Coöperatie Mobilisation for the Environment UA and Vereniging Leefmilieu v College van gedeputeerde staten van Limburg and College van gedeputeerde staten van Gelderland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Special areas of conservation — Article 6 — Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project for a site — National programmatic approach to tackling nitrogen deposition — Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘appropriate assessment’ — Overall assessment prior to individual authorisations for farms which cause nitrogen deposition.#Joined Cases C-293/17 and C-294/17.

  DownloadOpen at official source