Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.
Uitstele beantwoording vragen van de leden Dassen en Koekkoek over de interactie tussen organisaties inzake de situatie Afghanistan en het asiel- en migratiebeleid
Mededeling (uitstel antwoord) · 23 December 2021 · De interactie tussen organisaties inzake de situatie Afghanistan en het asiel- en migratiebeleid
DownloadOpen at official source
Nationality and Borders Bill
Briefing papers · 21 December 2021 · Nationality and Borders Act 2022
Open at official source
Antwoord op vragen van de leden Van der Lee en Kröger over het strafproces tegen een Nederlander voor zijn hulp aan vluchtelingen op Lesbos
Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · 20 December 2021 · Het strafproces tegen een Nederlander voor zijn hulp aan vluchtelingen op Lesbos
DownloadOpen at official source
De juridische basis waarmee gemeentes gedwongen worden asielzoekers op te vangen
Schriftelijke vragen · 20 December 2021 · De juridische basis waarmee gemeentes gedwongen worden asielzoekers op te vangen
DownloadOpen at official source
De aanwijzing aan gemeenten over de huisvesting van asielzoekers
Schriftelijke vragen · 19 December 2021 · De aanwijzing aan gemeenten over de huisvesting van asielzoekers
DownloadOpen at official source
Uitkomst APM-onderzoek naar asielzoekers die met onbekende bestemming vertrekken uit de opvang
Brief regering · 19 December 2021 · Uitkomst APM-onderzoek naar asielzoekers die met onbekende bestemming vertrekken uit de opvang
DownloadOpen at official source
Antwoord op vragen van de leden Maatoug en Gijs van Dijk over het bericht ‘Brandbrief grote steden: duizenden vluchtelingen veroordeeld tot falend inburgeringsstelsel’
Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · 16 December 2021 · Het bericht ‘Brandbrief grote steden: duizenden vluchtelingen veroordeeld tot falend inburgeringsstelsel’
DownloadOpen at official source
Postanowienie Trybunału (dziewiąta izba) z dnia 16 grudnia 2021 r.#FU przeciwko Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil).#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Artykuł 53 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Polityka azylowa – Kryteria i mechanizmy ustalania państwa członkowskiego odpowiedzialnego za rozpatrzenie wniosku o udzielenie ochrony międzynarodowej – Rozporządzenie (UE) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artykuł 27 – Środki odwoławcze od decyzji o przekazaniu – Brak związku między wnioskowaną wykładnią prawa Unii a rzeczywistym charakterem lub przedmiotem sporu w postępowaniu głównym – Oczywista niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Beschikking van het Hof (Negende kamer) van 16 december 2021.#FU tegen Federaal agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoekers (Fedasil).#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Artikel 53, lid 2, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Asielbeleid – Criteria en instrumenten om te bepalen welke lidstaat verantwoordelijk is voor de behandeling van een verzoek om internationale bescherming – Verordening (EU) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikel 27 – Rechtsmiddelen tegen het overdrachtsbesluit – Geen verband tussen de gevraagde uitlegging van het Unierecht en een reëel geschil of het voorwerp van het hoofdgeding – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 16 décembre 2021.#FU contre Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Politique d’asile – Critères et mécanismes de détermination de l’État membre responsable de l’examen d’une demande de protection internationale – Règlement (UE) no 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Voies de recours contre la décision de transfert – Absence de lien entre l’interprétation sollicitée du droit de l’Union et la réalité ou l’objet du litige au principal – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (ένατο τμήμα) της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 2021.#FU κατά Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Άρθρο 53, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου – Πολιτική ασύλου – Κριτήρια και μηχανισμοί για τον προσδιορισμό του κράτους μέλους που είναι υπεύθυνο για την εξέταση αίτησης διεθνούς προστασίας – Κανονισμός (ΕΕ) 604/2013 (Δουβλίνο III) – Άρθρο 27 – Ένδικο βοήθημα κατά της αποφάσεως μεταφοράς – Η ζητούμενη ερμηνεία του δικαίου της Ένωσης δεν έχει σχέση με το υποστατό ή το αντικείμενο της διαφοράς της κύριας δίκης – Προδήλως απαράδεκτο.#Υπόθεση C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Rješenje Suda (deveto vijeće) od 16. prosinca 2021.#FU protiv Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Članak 53. stavak 2. Poslovnika Suda – Politika azila – Kriteriji i mehanizmi za određivanje države članice odgovorne za razmatranje zahtjeva za međunarodnu zaštitu – Uredba (EU) br. 604/2013 (Dublin III.) – Članak 27. – Pravna sredstva protiv odluke o transferu – Nepostojanje veze između traženog tumačenja prava Unije i činjeničnog stanja ili predmeta spora u glavnom postupku – Očita nedopuštenost.#Predmet C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Id-Disa’ Awla) tas-16 ta’ Diċembru 2021.#FU vs Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Artikolu 53(2) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Politika tal-ażil – Kriterji u mekkaniżmi għad-determinazzjoni tal-Istat Membru responsabbli għall-eżami tal-applikazzjoni għal protezzjoni internazzjonali – Regolament (UE) Nru 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikolu 27 – Rimedji kontra d-deċiżjoni ta’ trasferiment – Assenza ta’ rabta bejn l-interpretazzjoni mitluba tad-dritt tal-Unjoni u r-realtà jew is-suġġett tal-kawża prinċipali – Inammissibbiltà manifesta.#Kawża C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens beslut (nionde avdelningen) av den 16 december 2021.#FU mot Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Artikel 53.2 i domstolens rättegångsregler – Asylpolitik – Kriterier och mekanismer för att fastställa vilken medlemsstat som är ansvarig för att pröva en ansökan om internationellt skydd – Förordning (EU) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikel 27 – Rättsmedel mot beslut om överföring – Den begärda tolkningen av unionsrätten har inte något samband med de verkliga omständigheterna eller saken i det nationella målet – Uppenbart att begäran om förhandsavgörande ska avvisas.#Mål C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens kendelse (Niende Afdeling) af 16. december 2021.#FU mod Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – artikel 53 og 2 i Domstolens procesreglement – asylpolitik – kriterier og procedurer til afgørelse af, hvilken medlemsstat der er ansvarlig for behandlingen af en ansøgning om international beskyttelse – forordning (EU) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – artikel 27 – retsmidler til prøvelse af en afgørelse om overførsel – ingen forbindelse mellem de EU-retlige bestemmelser, der ønskes fortolket, og realiteten i hovedsagen eller dennes genstand – åbenbart afvisningsgrundlag.#Sag C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (deviata komora) zo 16. decembra 2021.#FU proti Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Článok 53 ods. 2 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Azylová politika – Kritériá a mechanizmy na určenie členského štátu zodpovedného za posúdenie žiadosti o medzinárodnú ochranu – Nariadenie (EÚ) č. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Článok 27 – Opravné prostriedky proti rozhodnutiu o odovzdaní – Neexistencia súvislosti medzi požadovaným výkladom práva Únie a realitou alebo predmetom sporu vo veci samej – Zjavná neprípustnosť.#Vec C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Novena) de 16 de diciembre de 2021.#FU contra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Procedimiento prejudicial — Artículo 53, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Política de asilo — Criterios y mecanismos de determinación del Estado miembro responsable del examen de una solicitud de protección internacional — Reglamento (UE) n.º 604/2013 (Dublín III) — Artículo 27 — Vías de recurso contra la decisión de traslado — Inexistencia de relación entre la interpretación del Derecho de la Unión solicitada y la realidad o el objeto del litigio principal — Inadmisibilidad manifiesta.#Asunto C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (yhdeksäs jaosto) 16.12.2021.#FU vastaan Agence fédérale pour lʼAccueil des demandeurs dʼasile (Fedasil).#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 53 artiklan 2 kohta – Turvapaikkapolitiikka – Kansainvälistä suojelua koskevan hakemuksen käsittelystä vastuussa olevan jäsenvaltion määrittämisperusteet ja -menettelyt – Asetus (EU) N:o 604/2013 (Dublin III) – 27 artikla – Siirtopäätökseen kohdistuvat oikeussuojakeinot – Pyydetyllä unionin oikeuden tulkitsemisella ei ole yhteyttä pääasian tosiseikkoihin tai kohteeseen – Tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytysten selvä puuttuminen.#Asia C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sklep Sodišča (deveti senat) z dne 16. decembra 2021.#FU proti Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Predhodno odločanje – Člen 53(2) Poslovnika Sodišča – Azilna politika – Merila in mehanizmi za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito – Uredba (EU) št. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Člen 27 – Pravna sredstva zoper odločbo o predaji – Neobstoj povezave med zaprošeno razlago prava Unije in dejanskim stanjem ali predmetom spora o glavni stvari – Očitna nedopustnost.#Zadeva C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Ordonanța Curții (Camera a noua) din 16 decembrie 2021.#FU împotriva Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Trimitere preliminară – Articolul 53 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Politica privind azilul – Criterii și mecanisme de determinare a statului membru responsabil de examinarea unei cereri de protecție internațională – Regulamentul (UE) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Articolul 27 – Căi de atac împotriva deciziei de transfer – Lipsă de legătură între interpretarea solicitată a dreptului Uniunii și realitatea sau obiectul litigiului principal – Inadmisibilitate vădită.#Cauza C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Tiesas (devītā palāta) rīkojums, 2021. gada 16. decembris.#FU pret Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Tiesas Reglamenta 53. panta 2. punkts – Patvēruma politika – Kritēriji un mehānismi, lai noteiktu dalībvalsti, kura ir atbildīga par starptautiskās aizsardzības pieteikuma izskatīšanu – Regula (ES) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublina III) – 27. pants – Pret pārsūtīšanas lēmumu pieejamie tiesību aizsardzības līdzekļi – Saiknes neesamība starp lūgto Savienības tiesību interpretāciju un strīda pamatlietā patiesumu vai priekšmetu – Acīmredzama nepieņemamība.#Lieta C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
2021 m. gruodžio 16 d. Teisingumo Teismo (devintoji kolegija) nutartis.#FU prieš Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 53 straipsnio 2 dalis – Prieglobsčio politika – Valstybės narės, atsakingos už tarptautinės apsaugos prašymo nagrinėjimą, nustatymo kriterijai ir mechanizmai – Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublinas III) – 27 straipsnis – Teisių gynimo priemonės apskundžiant sprendimą dėl perdavimo – Prašomo Sąjungos teisės išaiškinimo ir pagrindinėje byloje nagrinėjamo ginčo aplinkybių ar dalyko ryšio nebuvimas – Akivaizdus nepriimtinumas.#Byla C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Ordinanza della Corte (Nona Sezione) del 16 dicembre 2021.#FU contro Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Articolo 53, paragrafo 2, del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Politica d’asilo – Criteri e meccanismi di determinazione dello Stato membro competente per l’esame di una domanda di protezione internazionale – Regolamento (UE) n. 604/2013 (Dublino III) – Articolo 27 – Mezzi di ricorso contro la decisione di trasferimento – Mancanza di collegamento fra l’interpretazione richiesta del diritto dell’Unione e la realtà effettiva o l’oggetto della controversia del procedimento principale – Irricevibilità manifesta.#Causa C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
A Bíróság végzése (kilencedik tanács), 2021. december 16.#FU kontra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Előzetes döntéshozatal – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 53. cikkének (2) bekezdése – Menekültpolitika – A nemzetközi védelem iránti kérelem megvizsgálásáért felelős tagállam meghatározására vonatkozó feltételek és eljárási szabályok – 604/2013/EU (»Dublin III«) rendelet – 27. cikk – Az átadásra vonatkozó határozattal szembeni jogorvoslati lehetőségek – Az uniós jog kért értelmezése és az alapügy tényállása vagy tárgya közötti összefüggés hiánya – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság.#C-505/21. sz. ügy.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Euroopa Kohtu määrus (üheksas koda), 16.12.2021.#FU versus Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Eelotsusetaotlus – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 53 lõige 2 – Varjupaigapoliitika – Rahvusvahelise kaitse taotluse läbivaatamise eest vastutava liikmesriigi määramise kriteeriumid ja mehhanismid – Määrus (EL) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikkel 27 – Üleandmisotsuse vaidlustamise viisid – Taotletud liidu õiguse tõlgenduse ja põhikohtuasja faktiliste asjaolude või eseme vahelise seose puudumine – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 16. Dezember 2021.#FU gegen Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 53 Abs. 2 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Asylpolitik – Kriterien und Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Mitgliedstaats, der für die Prüfung eines Antrags auf internationalen Schutz zuständig ist – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Art. 27 – Rechtsmittel gegen eine Überstellungsentscheidung – Kein Zusammenhang zwischen der erbetenen Auslegung des Unionsrechts und den Gegebenheiten oder dem Gegenstand des Ausgangsverfahrens – Offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Nona Secção) de 16 de dezembro de 2021.#FU contra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reenvio prejudicial — Artigo 53.°, n.° 2, Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça — Política de asilo — Critérios e mecanismos de determinação do Estado‑Membro responsável pela análise de um pedido de proteção internacional — Regulamento (UE) n.° 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Artigo 27.° — Vias de recurso contra a decisão de transferência — Inexistência de relação entre a interpretação do direito da União pedida e a realidade do objeto do litígio no processo principal — Inadmissibilidade manifesta.#Processo C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Usnesení Soudního dvora (devátého senátu) ze dne 16. prosince 2021.#FU v. Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Článek 53 odst. 2 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Azylová politika – Kritéria a postupy pro určení členského státu příslušného k posuzování žádosti o mezinárodní ochranu – Nařízení (EU) č. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Článek 27 – Opravné prostředky proti rozhodnutí o přemístění – Neexistence vztahu mezi požadovaným výkladem unijního práva a realitou nebo předmětem sporu v původním řízení – Zjevná nepřípustnost.#Věc C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Определение на Съда (девети състав) от 16 декември 2021 г.#FU срещу Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Преюдициално запитване — Член 53, параграф 2 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Политика относно убежището — Критерии и механизми за определяне на държавата членка, компетентна за разглеждането на молба за международна закрила — Регламент (ЕС) № 604/2013 („Дъблин III“) — Член 27 — Способи за защита срещу решението за прехвърляне — Липса на връзка между исканото тълкуване на правото на Съюза и действителността или предмета на спора в главното производство — Явна недопустимост.#Дело C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens beslut (nionde avdelningen) av den 16 december 2021.#FU mot Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Artikel 53.2 i domstolens rättegångsregler – Asylpolitik – Kriterier och mekanismer för att fastställa vilken medlemsstat som är ansvarig för att pröva en ansökan om internationellt skydd – Förordning (EU) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikel 27 – Rättsmedel mot beslut om överföring – Den begärda tolkningen av unionsrätten har inte något samband med de verkliga omständigheterna eller saken i det nationella målet – Uppenbart att begäran om förhandsavgörande ska avvisas.#Mål C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sklep Sodišča (deveti senat) z dne 16. decembra 2021.#FU proti Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Predhodno odločanje – Člen 53(2) Poslovnika Sodišča – Azilna politika – Merila in mehanizmi za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito – Uredba (EU) št. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Člen 27 – Pravna sredstva zoper odločbo o predaji – Neobstoj povezave med zaprošeno razlago prava Unije in dejanskim stanjem ali predmetom spora o glavni stvari – Očitna nedopustnost.#Zadeva C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (deviata komora) zo 16. decembra 2021.#FU proti Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Článok 53 ods. 2 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Azylová politika – Kritériá a mechanizmy na určenie členského štátu zodpovedného za posúdenie žiadosti o medzinárodnú ochranu – Nariadenie (EÚ) č. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Článok 27 – Opravné prostriedky proti rozhodnutiu o odovzdaní – Neexistencia súvislosti medzi požadovaným výkladom práva Únie a realitou alebo predmetom sporu vo veci samej – Zjavná neprípustnosť.#Vec C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Ordonanța Curții (Camera a noua) din 16 decembrie 2021.#FU împotriva Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de tribunal du travail de Liège.#Trimitere preliminară – Articolul 53 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Politica privind azilul – Criterii și mecanisme de determinare a statului membru responsabil de examinarea unei cereri de protecție internațională – Regulamentul (UE) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Articolul 27 – Căi de atac împotriva deciziei de transfer – Lipsă de legătură între interpretarea solicitată a dreptului Uniunii și realitatea sau obiectul litigiului principal – Inadmisibilitate vădită.#Cauza C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Nona Secção) de 16 de dezembro de 2021.#FU contra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reenvio prejudicial — Artigo 53.°, n.° 2, Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça — Política de asilo — Critérios e mecanismos de determinação do Estado‑Membro responsável pela análise de um pedido de proteção internacional — Regulamento (UE) n.° 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Artigo 27.° — Vias de recurso contra a decisão de transferência — Inexistência de relação entre a interpretação do direito da União pedida e a realidade do objeto do litígio no processo principal — Inadmissibilidade manifesta.#Processo C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Postanowienie Trybunału (dziewiąta izba) z dnia 16 grudnia 2021 r.#FU przeciwko Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil).#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Artykuł 53 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Polityka azylowa – Kryteria i mechanizmy ustalania państwa członkowskiego odpowiedzialnego za rozpatrzenie wniosku o udzielenie ochrony międzynarodowej – Rozporządzenie (UE) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artykuł 27 – Środki odwoławcze od decyzji o przekazaniu – Brak związku między wnioskowaną wykładnią prawa Unii a rzeczywistym charakterem lub przedmiotem sporu w postępowaniu głównym – Oczywista niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Beschikking van het Hof (Negende kamer) van 16 december 2021.#FU tegen Federaal agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoekers (Fedasil).#Verzoek van de tribunal du travail de Liège om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Artikel 53, lid 2, van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Asielbeleid – Criteria en instrumenten om te bepalen welke lidstaat verantwoordelijk is voor de behandeling van een verzoek om internationale bescherming – Verordening (EU) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikel 27 – Rechtsmiddelen tegen het overdrachtsbesluit – Geen verband tussen de gevraagde uitlegging van het Unierecht en een reëel geschil of het voorwerp van het hoofdgeding – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Id-Disa’ Awla) tas-16 ta’ Diċembru 2021.#FU vs Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mit-Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Artikolu 53(2) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Politika tal-ażil – Kriterji u mekkaniżmi għad-determinazzjoni tal-Istat Membru responsabbli għall-eżami tal-applikazzjoni għal protezzjoni internazzjonali – Regolament (UE) Nru 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikolu 27 – Rimedji kontra d-deċiżjoni ta’ trasferiment – Assenza ta’ rabta bejn l-interpretazzjoni mitluba tad-dritt tal-Unjoni u r-realtà jew is-suġġett tal-kawża prinċipali – Inammissibbiltà manifesta.#Kawża C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Tiesas (devītā palāta) rīkojums, 2021. gada 16. decembris.#FU pret Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Tribunal du travail de Liège lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Tiesas Reglamenta 53. panta 2. punkts – Patvēruma politika – Kritēriji un mehānismi, lai noteiktu dalībvalsti, kura ir atbildīga par starptautiskās aizsardzības pieteikuma izskatīšanu – Regula (ES) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublina III) – 27. pants – Pret pārsūtīšanas lēmumu pieejamie tiesību aizsardzības līdzekļi – Saiknes neesamība starp lūgto Savienības tiesību interpretāciju un strīda pamatlietā patiesumu vai priekšmetu – Acīmredzama nepieņemamība.#Lieta C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
2021 m. gruodžio 16 d. Teisingumo Teismo (devintoji kolegija) nutartis.#FU prieš Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Tribunal du travail de Liège prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 53 straipsnio 2 dalis – Prieglobsčio politika – Valstybės narės, atsakingos už tarptautinės apsaugos prašymo nagrinėjimą, nustatymo kriterijai ir mechanizmai – Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublinas III) – 27 straipsnis – Teisių gynimo priemonės apskundžiant sprendimą dėl perdavimo – Prašomo Sąjungos teisės išaiškinimo ir pagrindinėje byloje nagrinėjamo ginčo aplinkybių ar dalyko ryšio nebuvimas – Akivaizdus nepriimtinumas.#Byla C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Ordinanza della Corte (Nona Sezione) del 16 dicembre 2021.#FU contro Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Articolo 53, paragrafo 2, del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Politica d’asilo – Criteri e meccanismi di determinazione dello Stato membro competente per l’esame di una domanda di protezione internazionale – Regolamento (UE) n. 604/2013 (Dublino III) – Articolo 27 – Mezzi di ricorso contro la decisione di trasferimento – Mancanza di collegamento fra l’interpretazione richiesta del diritto dell’Unione e la realtà effettiva o l’oggetto della controversia del procedimento principale – Irricevibilità manifesta.#Causa C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
A Bíróság végzése (kilencedik tanács), 2021. december 16.#FU kontra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Tribunal du travail de Liège által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 53. cikkének (2) bekezdése – Menekültpolitika – A nemzetközi védelem iránti kérelem megvizsgálásáért felelős tagállam meghatározására vonatkozó feltételek és eljárási szabályok – 604/2013/EU (»Dublin III«) rendelet – 27. cikk – Az átadásra vonatkozó határozattal szembeni jogorvoslati lehetőségek – Az uniós jog kért értelmezése és az alapügy tényállása vagy tárgya közötti összefüggés hiánya – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság.#C-505/21. sz. ügy.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Rješenje Suda (deveto vijeće) od 16. prosinca 2021.#FU protiv Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Članak 53. stavak 2. Poslovnika Suda – Politika azila – Kriteriji i mehanizmi za određivanje države članice odgovorne za razmatranje zahtjeva za međunarodnu zaštitu – Uredba (EU) br. 604/2013 (Dublin III.) – Članak 27. – Pravna sredstva protiv odluke o transferu – Nepostojanje veze između traženog tumačenja prava Unije i činjeničnog stanja ili predmeta spora u glavnom postupku – Očita nedopuštenost.#Predmet C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (yhdeksäs jaosto) 16.12.2021.#FU vastaan Agence fédérale pour lʼAccueil des demandeurs dʼasile (Fedasil).#Tribunal du travail de Liègen esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 53 artiklan 2 kohta – Turvapaikkapolitiikka – Kansainvälistä suojelua koskevan hakemuksen käsittelystä vastuussa olevan jäsenvaltion määrittämisperusteet ja -menettelyt – Asetus (EU) N:o 604/2013 (Dublin III) – 27 artikla – Siirtopäätökseen kohdistuvat oikeussuojakeinot – Pyydetyllä unionin oikeuden tulkitsemisella ei ole yhteyttä pääasian tosiseikkoihin tai kohteeseen – Tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytysten selvä puuttuminen.#Asia C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Euroopa Kohtu määrus (üheksas koda), 16.12.2021.#FU versus Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 53 lõige 2 – Varjupaigapoliitika – Rahvusvahelise kaitse taotluse läbivaatamise eest vastutava liikmesriigi määramise kriteeriumid ja mehhanismid – Määrus (EL) nr 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Artikkel 27 – Üleandmisotsuse vaidlustamise viisid – Taotletud liidu õiguse tõlgenduse ja põhikohtuasja faktiliste asjaolude või eseme vahelise seose puudumine – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Novena) de 16 de diciembre de 2021.#FU contra Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Artículo 53, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Política de asilo — Criterios y mecanismos de determinación del Estado miembro responsable del examen de una solicitud de protección internacional — Reglamento (UE) n.º 604/2013 (Dublín III) — Artículo 27 — Vías de recurso contra la decisión de traslado — Inexistencia de relación entre la interpretación del Derecho de la Unión solicitada y la realidad o el objeto del litigio principal — Inadmisibilidad manifiesta.#Asunto C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (ένατο τμήμα) της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 2021.#FU κατά Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Αίτηση του Tribunal du travail de Liège για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Άρθρο 53, παράγραφος 2, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου – Πολιτική ασύλου – Κριτήρια και μηχανισμοί για τον προσδιορισμό του κράτους μέλους που είναι υπεύθυνο για την εξέταση αίτησης διεθνούς προστασίας – Κανονισμός (ΕΕ) 604/2013 (Δουβλίνο III) – Άρθρο 27 – Ένδικο βοήθημα κατά της αποφάσεως μεταφοράς – Η ζητούμενη ερμηνεία του δικαίου της Ένωσης δεν έχει σχέση με το υποστατό ή το αντικείμενο της διαφοράς της κύριας δίκης – Προδήλως απαράδεκτο.#Υπόθεση C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 16. Dezember 2021.#FU gegen Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 53 Abs. 2 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Asylpolitik – Kriterien und Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Mitgliedstaats, der für die Prüfung eines Antrags auf internationalen Schutz zuständig ist – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Art. 27 – Rechtsmittel gegen eine Überstellungsentscheidung – Kein Zusammenhang zwischen der erbetenen Auslegung des Unionsrechts und den Gegebenheiten oder dem Gegenstand des Ausgangsverfahrens – Offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens kendelse (Niende Afdeling) af 16. december 2021.#FU mod Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – artikel 53 og 2 i Domstolens procesreglement – asylpolitik – kriterier og procedurer til afgørelse af, hvilken medlemsstat der er ansvarlig for behandlingen af en ansøgning om international beskyttelse – forordning (EU) nr. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – artikel 27 – retsmidler til prøvelse af en afgørelse om overførsel – ingen forbindelse mellem de EU-retlige bestemmelser, der ønskes fortolket, og realiteten i hovedsagen eller dennes genstand – åbenbart afvisningsgrundlag.#Sag C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source
Usnesení Soudního dvora (devátého senátu) ze dne 16. prosince 2021.#FU v. Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Článek 53 odst. 2 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Azylová politika – Kritéria a postupy pro určení členského státu příslušného k posuzování žádosti o mezinárodní ochranu – Nařízení (EU) č. 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Článek 27 – Opravné prostředky proti rozhodnutí o přemístění – Neexistence vztahu mezi požadovaným výkladem unijního práva a realitou nebo předmětem sporu v původním řízení – Zjevná nepřípustnost.#Věc C-505/21.
judgment · 16 December 2021 · Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.
DownloadOpen at official source