Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.
Предложение за ДИРЕКТИВА НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И НА СЪВЕТА за прозрачни и предвидими условия на труд в Европейския съюз
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Vorschlag für eine RICHTLINIE DES EUROPÄISCHEN PARLAMENTS UND DES RATES über transparente und verlässliche Arbeitsbedingungen in der Europäischen Union
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Proposition de DIRECTIVE DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL relative à des conditions de travail transparentes et prévisibles dans l’Union européenne
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Πρόταση ΟΔΗΓΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ για διαφανείς και προβλέψιμους όρους εργασίας στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Togra le haghaidh TREOIR Ó PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA AGUS ÓN gCOMHAIRLE maidir le dálaí oibre trédhearcacha agus intuartha san Aontas Eorpach
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
preparatory · 21 December 2017 · Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union
DownloadOpen at official source
Version of the bill showing changes made in committee
Tracked changes versions of Bills: Commons · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Excel spreadsheet of New Clauses and Amendments considered in Committee of the whole House
Amendment Paper · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Notices of Amendments as at 20 December 2017
Amendment Paper · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Notices of Amendments as at 20 December 2017
Amendment Paper · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Committee of the whole House Proceedings as at 20 December 2017
Bill proceedings: Commons · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Committee of the whole House Proceedings as at 20 December 2017
Bill proceedings: Commons · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
All proceedings up to 20 December 2017 at Committee of the whole House Stage
Bill proceedings: Commons · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
All proceedings up to 20 December 2017 at Committee of the whole House Stage
Bill proceedings: Commons · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Bill 147 2017-19, as Amended in Committee
Bill · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Bill 147 2017-19, as Amended in Committee
Bill · 21 December 2017 · European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
Open at official source
Antwoord op vragen van het lid Becker over het bericht ‘EU-exportsancties Rusland te onduidelijk’
Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · 20 December 2017 · Het bericht ‘EU-exportsancties Rusland te onduidelijk’
DownloadOpen at official source
Aan bewindspersoon - overbrengen besluit commissie
Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · 20 December 2017 · Integraal overzicht met nieuw gepubliceerde EU-voorstellen week 49-50 (4 december 2017- 15 december 2017) d.d. 15 december 2017
DownloadOpen at official source
Brief van de vaste commissie voor Europese Zaken over het plaatsen van een parlementair behandelvoorbehoud bij de EU-voorstellen inzake de Economische en Monetaire Unie COM (2017) 824 en 827
Brief commissie · 20 December 2017 · Brief van de vaste commissie voor Europese Zaken over het plaatsen van een parlementair behandelvoorbehoud bij de EU-voorstellen inzake de Economische en Monetaire Unie COM (2017) 824 en 827
DownloadOpen at official source
Motie van het lid De Jong over geen EU-richtlijnen op pensioengebied implementeren
Motie · 20 December 2017 · Motie van het lid De Jong over geen EU-richtlijnen op pensioengebied implementeren
DownloadOpen at official source
Aan minister FIN - verzoek inzake BNC-fiches voorstellen EMU-pakket
Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · 20 December 2017 · EU-voorstel: Richtlijn van de Raad tot vaststelling van bepalingen ter versterking van de begrotingsverantwoordelijkheid en de begrotingskoers op middellange termijn in de lidstaten COM (2017) 824
DownloadOpen at official source
Lijst van vragen en antwoorden over de Appreciatie van het conceptakkoord om het EU handelsdefensief instrumentarium te moderniseren
Lijst van vragen en antwoorden · 20 December 2017 · Beantwoording vragen commissie over de Appreciatie van het conceptakkoord om het EU handelsdefensief instrumentarium te moderniseren
DownloadOpen at official source
A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2017. december 20.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. kontra Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#A Sąd Najwyższy (Lengyelország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Az elektronikus hírközlő hálózatok és elektronikus hírközlési szolgáltatások közös keretszabályozása – 2002/21/EK irányelv – 8. és 16. cikk – 2002/19/EK irányelv – 8. és 13. cikk – A piacon jelentős piaci erővel rendelkezőként kijelölt üzemeltető – Az árak ellenőrzése – A nemzeti szabályozó hatóságok által előírt kötelezettségek – Az árak költségalapúságára vonatkozó kötelezettség – Az érintett üzemeltető mobilhálózaton nyújtott hívásvégződtetési szolgáltatás nyújtásával kapcsolatban felmerült költségeinél alacsonyabb összegben megállapított árak – Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája – 16. cikk – A vállalkozás szabadsága – Arányosság.#C-277/16. sz. ügy.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 20 décembre 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. contre Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Sąd Najwyższy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Cadre réglementaire commun pour les réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/21/CE – Articles 8 et 16 – Directive 2002/19/CE – Articles 8 et 13 – Opérateur désigné comme disposant d’une puissance significative sur un marché – Contrôle des prix – Obligations imposées par les autorités réglementaires nationales – Obligation d’orientation des prix en fonction des coûts – Fixation des tarifs en dessous des coûts exposés par l’opérateur concerné pour la fourniture des services de terminaison d’appel vocal sur des réseaux mobiles – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 16 – Liberté d’entreprise – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 20 декември 2017 г.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. срещу Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Sąd Najwyższy.#Преюдициално запитване — Обща регулаторна рамка за електронните съобщителни мрежи и услуги — Директива 2002/21/EО — Членове 8 и 16 — Директива 2002/19/EО — Членове 8 и 13 — Оператор, определен като притежаващ значителна пазарна сила на даден пазар — Ценови контрол — Задължения, наложени от националните регулаторни органи — Задължение за ориентиране на цените към себестойността — Определяне на цени, които са по-ниски от направените от съответния оператор разходи за предоставяне на услугата терминиране на гласови повиквания в мобилни мрежи — Харта на основните права на Европейския съюз — Член 16 — Свобода на стопанската инициатива — Пропорционалност.#Дело C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 20 grudnia 2017 r.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. przeciwko Prezesowi Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Sąd Najwyższy.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Wspólne ramy regulacyjne sieci i usług łączności elektronicznej – Dyrektywa 2002/21/WE – Artykuły 8 i 16 – Dyrektywa 2002/19/WE – Artykuły 8 i 13 – Operator wskazany jako posiadający znaczącą pozycję na rynku – Kontrola cen – Obowiązki nałożone przez krajowe organy regulacyjne – Obowiązek oparcia cen na kosztach – Ustalanie opłat poniżej kosztów ponoszonych przez danego operatora z tytułu świadczenia usług zakańczania połączeń głosowych w sieciach ruchomych – Karta praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Artykuł 16 – Wolność prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej – Proporcjonalność.#Sprawa C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) z 20. decembra 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. proti Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Sąd Najwyższy.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Spoločný regulačný rámec pre elektronické komunikačné siete a služby – Smernica 2002/21/ES – Články 8 a 16 – Smernica 2002/19/ES – Články 8 a 13 – Operátor označený ako operátor s významným vplyvom na trhu – Kontrola cien – Povinnosti uložené národnými regulačnými orgánmi – Povinnosť nákladovej orientácie cien – Stanovenie cien nižších, ako sú náklady, ktoré dotknutému operátorovi vznikli v súvislosti s poskytovaním služby ukončenia volania v mobilných sieťach – Charta základných práv Európskej únie – Článok 16 – Sloboda podnikania – Proporcionalita.#Vec C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 20.12.2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. versus Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Sąd Najwyższy.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Elektrooniliste sidevõrkude ja -teenuste ühine reguleeriv raamistik – Direktiiv 2002/21/EÜ – Artiklid 8 ja 16 – Direktiiv 2002/19/EÜ – Artiklid 8 ja 13 – Operaator, keda konkreetsel turul peetakse märkimisväärset turujõudu omavaks – Hinnakontroll – Riigi reguleerivate asutuste kehtestatud kohustused – Kuludele orienteeritud hindade kohustus – Tasude kehtestamine tasemel, mis on madalam kui kindla operaatori tegelikud kulud mobiilivõrgus kõne lõpetamise teenuse osutamisel – Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta – Artikkel 16 – Ettevõtlusvabadus – Proportsionaalsus.#Kohtuasi C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 20. december 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. mod Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sąd Najwyższy.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – fælles rammebestemmelser for elektroniske kommunikationsnet og ‑tjenester – direktiv 2002/21/EF – artikel 8 og 16 – direktiv 2002/19/EF – artikel 8 og 13 – udbyder, der anses for at have en stærk markedsposition – priskontrol – forpligtelser, der pålægges af de nationale tilsynsmyndigheder – forpligtelse til omkostningsbaserede priser – priser fastsat under den berørte udbyders omkostninger til udbud af termineringstjenester på mobilnet – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – artikel 16 – frihed til at oprette og drive egen virksomhed – proportionalitet præjudiciel forelæggelse.#Sag C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 20 decembrie 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. împotriva Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Sąd Najwyższy.#Trimitere preliminară – Cadru de reglementare comun pentru rețelele și serviciile de comunicații electronice – Directiva 2002/21/CE – Articolele 8 și 16 – Directiva 2002/19/CE – Articolele 8 și 13 – Operator desemnat ca având o putere semnificativă pe o piață – Controlul prețurilor – Obligații impuse de autoritățile naționale de reglementare – Obligația orientării prețurilor în funcție de costuri – Stabilirea tarifelor la un nivel inferior față de costurile suportate de operatorul în cauză pentru furnizarea serviciilor de terminare a apelurilor de voce în rețelele mobile – Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene – Articolul 16 – Libertatea de a desfășura o activitate comercială – Proporționalitate.#Cauza C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 20. prosince 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v. Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Sąd Najwyższy.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Společný předpisový rámec pro sítě a služby elektronických komunikací – Směrnice 2002/21/ES – Články 8 a 16 – Směrnice 2002/19/ES – Články 8 a 13 – Hospodářský subjekt, který byl označen za operátora s významnou tržní silou – Regulace cen – Povinnosti uložené vnitrostátními regulačními orgány – Povinnost nákladově orientovat ceny – Určování sazeb pod úrovní nákladů vynaložených dotčeným operátorem na poskytování služeb ukončení hlasového volání v mobilních sítích – Listina základních práv Evropské unie – Článek 16 – Svoboda podnikání – Proporcionalita.#Věc C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 20. decembra 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. proti Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Sąd Najwyższy.#Predhodno odločanje – Skupni regulativni okvir za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve – Direktiva 2002/21/ES – Člena 8 in 16 – Direktiva 2002/19/ES – Člena 8 in 13 – Operater, ki je določen kot operater s pomembno tržno močjo – Nadzor cen – Obveznosti, ki jih naložijo nacionalni regulativni organi – Obveznost stroškovne naravnanosti cen – Določitev cen storitev na raven, ki je nižja od stroškov, ki so nastali zadevnemu operaterju za opravljanje storitev zaključevanja govornih klicev v mobilnih omrežjih – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 16 – Svoboda gospodarske pobude – Sorazmernost.#Zadeva C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 20. prosinca 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. protiv Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Sąd Najwyższy.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Zajednički regulatorni okvir za elektroničke komunikacijske mreže i usluge – Direktiva 2002/21/EZ – Članci 8. i 16. – Direktiva 2002/19/EZ – Članci 8. i 13. – Operator koji je određen kao operator sa značajnom tržišnom snagom – Nadzor cijena – Obveze koje nameću državna regulatorna tijela – Obveza troškovne usmjerenosti cijena – Određivanje naknada koje su niže od troškova koji dotičnom operatoru nastaju prilikom pružanja usluge završavanja glasovnih poziva u pokretnim mrežama – Povelja Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Članak 16. – Sloboda poduzetništva – Proporcionalnost.#Predmet C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 20.12.2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. vastaan Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Sąd Najwyższyn esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Sähköisten viestintäverkkojen ja -palvelujen yhteinen sääntelyjärjestelmä – Direktiivi 2002/21/EY – 8 ja 16 artikla – Direktiivi 2002/19/EY – 8 ja 13 artikla – Operaattori, jolla on määritelty olevan huomattava markkinavoima – Hintavalvonta – Kansallisten sääntelyviranomaisten asettamat velvollisuudet – Hinnoittelun kustannuslähtöisyyttä koskeva velvollisuus – Hintojen vahvistaminen puheensiirron kohdeverkkopalvelujen tarjoamisesta matkapuhelinverkoissa asianomaiselle operaattorille aiheutuneita kustannuksia alhaisemmiksi – Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja – 16 artikla – Elinkeinovapaus – Oikeasuhteisuus.#Asia C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 20 de diciembre de 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. contra Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Sąd Najwyższy.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Marco regulador común de las redes y los servicios de comunicaciones electrónicas — Directiva 2002/21/CE — Artículos 8 y 16 — Directiva 2002/19/CE — Artículos 8 y 13 — Operador que tiene un peso significativo en un mercado — Control de precios — Obligaciones impuestas por las autoridades nacionales de reglamentación — Obligación de orientación de los precios en función de los costes — Precios fijados en un nivel inferior a los costes contraídos por el operador en cuestión para la prestación del servicio de terminación de llamadas vocales en redes móviles — Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea — Artículo 16 — Libertad de empresa — Proporcionalidad.#Asunto C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 20 dicembre 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. contro Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Sąd Najwyższy.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Quadro normativo comune per le reti ed i servizi di comunicazione elettronica – Direttiva 2002/21/CE – Articoli 8 e 16 – Direttiva 2002/19/CE – Articoli 8 e 13 – Operatore designato come detentore di un significativo potere di mercato – Controllo dei prezzi – Obblighi imposti dalle autorità nazionali di regolamentazione – Obbligo di orientare i prezzi ai costi – Prezzi fissati al di sotto dei costi sostenuti dall’operatore di cui trattasi per la fornitura del servizio di terminazione di chiamata vocale sulle reti mobili – Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea – Articolo 16 – Libertà d’impresa – Proporzionalità.#Causa C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
2017 m. gruodžio 20 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. prieš Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Sąd Najwyższy prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Elektroninių ryšių tinklų ir paslaugų bendroji reguliavimo sistema – Direktyva 2002/21/EB – 8 ir 16 straipsniai – Direktyva 2002/19/EB – 8 ir 13 straipsniai – Operatorius, pripažintas turinčiu didelę įtaką rinkoje – Kainų kontrolė – Nacionalinių reguliavimo institucijų nustatyti įpareigojimai – Įpareigojimas nustatyti sąnaudomis pagrįstas kainas – Nustatymas tarifų, kurie yra mažesni už atitinkamo operatoriaus teikiant balso skambučių užbaigimo judriojo ryšio tinkluose paslaugas patiriamas sąnaudas – Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartija – 16 straipsnis – Laisvė užsiimti verslu – Proporcingumas.#Byla C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 20 december 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. tegen Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Verzoek van de Sąd Najwyższy om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Gemeenschappelijk regelgevingskader voor elektronischecommunicatienetwerken en -diensten – Richtlijn 2002/21/EG – Artikelen 8 en 16 – Richtlijn 2002/19/EG – Artikelen 8 en 13 – Exploitant die is aangemerkt als onderneming met aanmerkelijke marktmacht – Prijscontrole – Verplichtingen opgelegd door de nationale regelgevende instanties – Verplichting inzake kostenoriëntering van prijzen – Prijzen die lager worden vastgesteld dan de kosten die de betrokken exploitant maakt voor de levering van de afgiftedienst op mobiele netwerken – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 16 – Vrijheid van ondernemerschap – Evenredigheid.#Zaak C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 20 de dezembro de 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. contra Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Sąd Najwyższy.#Reenvio prejudicial — Quadro regulamentar comum para as redes e serviços de comunicações eletrónicas — Diretiva 2002/21/CE — Artigos 8.o e 16.o — Diretiva 2002/19/CE — Artigos 8.o e 13.o — Operador com um poder significativo num mercado — Controlo dos preços — Obrigações impostas pelas autoridades reguladoras nacionais — Obrigação de orientação dos preços em função dos custos — Fixação das tarifas abaixo dos custos suportados pelo operador em causa pelo fornecimento de serviços de terminação de chamadas vocais em redes móveis — Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União Europeia — Artigo 16.o — Liberdade de empresa — Proporcionalidade.#Processo C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2017. gada 20. decembris.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. pret Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Sąd Najwyższy lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Kopējie reglamentējošie noteikumi attiecībā uz elektronisko komunikāciju tīkliem un pakalpojumiem – Direktīva 2002/21/EK – 8. un 16. pants – Direktīva 2002/19 EK – 8. un 13. pants – Operators, kas izraudzīts kā tāds, kam ir būtiska ietekme tirgū – Cenu kontrole – Valsts regulatīvo iestāžu noteiktie pienākumi – Pienākums par cenu orientāciju uz izmaksām – Tarifi, kas ir noteikti zemāki par izmaksām, kas radušās attiecīgajam operatoram, sniedzot balss zvana savienojuma pabeigšanas pakalpojumus mobilo sakaru tīklā – Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību harta – 16. pants – Darījumdarbības brīvība – Samērīgums.#Lieta C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tal-20 ta’ Diċembru 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. vs Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mis-Sąd Najwyższy.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Qafas regolatorju komuni għan-networks ta’ komunikazzjonijiet u servizzi elettroniċi – Direttiva 2002/21/KE – Artikoli 8 u 16 – Direttiva 2002/19/KE – Artikoli 8 u 13 – Operatur identifikat li jiddisponi minn saħħa sinjifikattiva fis-suq – Kontroll tal-prezzijiet – Obbligi imposti mill-awtoritajiet regolatorji nazzjonali – Obbligu ta’ orjentazzjoni tal-prezzijiet abbażi tal-ispejjeż – Iffissar ta’ tariffi inqas mill-ispejjeż sostnuti mill-operatur ikkonċernat għall-provvista ta’ servizzi ta’ terminazzjoni ta’ telefonati bil-vuċi fin-networks ċellulari – Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Artikolu 16 – Libertà ta’ impriża – Proporzjonalità.#Kawża C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 20 december 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. mot Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Sąd Najwyższy.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Gemensamt regelverk för elektroniska kommunikationsnät och kommunikationstjänster – Direktiv 2002/21/EG – Artiklarna 8 och 16 – Direktiv 2002/19/EG – Artiklarna 8 och 13 – Operatör som anges ha ett betydande inflytande på en viss marknad – Priskontroll – Skyldigheter införda av de nationella regleringsmyndigheterna – Skyldighet att tillämpa kostnadsorienterad prissättning – Priser som satts under den berörda operatörens kostnader för att tillhandahålla tjänster avseende terminering av röstsamtal i mobila nät – Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna – Artikel 16 – Näringsfrihet – Proportionalitet.#Mål C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 20. Dezember 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. gegen Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Sąd Najwyższy.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsamer Rechtsrahmen für elektronische Kommunikationsnetze und ‑dienste – Richtlinie 2002/21/EG – Art. 8 und 16 – Richtlinie 2002/19/EG – Art. 8 und 13 – Unternehmen, das als Betreiber mit beträchtlicher Marktmacht auf einem Markt eingestuft wird – Preiskontrolle – Von den nationalen Regulierungsbehörden auferlegte Verpflichtungen – Verpflichtung zur kostenorientierten Preisgestaltung – Festsetzung von Gebühren, die unter den dem Betreiber durch Anrufzustellungen in Mobilfunknetzen entstehenden Kosten liegen – Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Art. 16 – Unternehmerische Freiheit – Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 20ής Δεκεμβρίου 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. κατά Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Αίτηση του Sąd Najwyższy για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Κοινό κανονιστικό πλαίσιο για δίκτυα και υπηρεσίες ηλεκτρονικών επικοινωνιών – Οδηγία 2002/21/ΕΚ – Άρθρα 8 και 16 – Οδηγία 2002/19/ΕΚ – Άρθρα 8 και 13 – Φορέας εκμετάλλευσης ο οποίος ορίζεται ως έχων σημαντική ισχύ σε αγορά – Έλεγχος των τιμών – Υποχρεώσεις που επιβάλλονται από τις εθνικές κανονιστικές αρχές – Υποχρέωση καθορισμού των τιμών με γνώμονα το κόστος – Καθορισμός χρεώσεων χαμηλότερων από το κόστος στο οποίο υποβάλλεται ο φορέας για την παροχή των υπηρεσιών τερματισμού φωνητικών κλήσεων σε δίκτυα κινητής τηλεφωνίας – Χάρτης των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης – Άρθρο 16 – Επιχειρηματική ελευθερία – Αναλογικότητα.#Υπόθεση C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Polkomtel sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 8 and 16 — Directive 2002/19/EC — Articles 8 and 13 — Operator designated as having significant market power — Price control — Obligations imposed by national regulatory authorities — Obligation to ensure cost orientation of prices — Prices set below the costs incurred by the operator concerned for the provision of voice call termination services on mobile networks — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Proportionality.#Case C-277/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (siedma komora) z 20. decembra 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen proti Agrarmarkt Austria.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Poľnohospodárstvo – Spoločná organizácia trhov – Operačný program v odvetví ovocia a zeleniny – Nariadenie (EÚ) č. 1234/2007, zmenené nariadením (ES) č. 361/2008 – Články 103b, 103d a 103g – Finančná pomoc Európskej únie – Vykonávacie nariadenie (EÚ) č. 543/2011 – Článok 60 a príloha IX bod 23 – Investícia realizovaná v podnikoch a/alebo priestoroch organizácie výrobcov – Pojem – Legitímna dôvera – Právna istota.#Vec C-516/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Operational programme in the fruit and vegetables sector — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 — Articles 103b, 103d and 103g — EU financial aid — Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Article 60 and point 23 of Annex IX — Investments on the holdings and/or premises of the producer organisations — Concept — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case C-516/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Séptima) de 20 de diciembre de 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen contra Agrarmarkt Austria.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Agricultura — Organización común de mercados — Programa operativo en el sector de las frutas y hortalizas — Reglamento (CE) n.o 1234/2007, en su versión modificada por el Reglamento (CE) n.o 361/2008 — Artículos 103 ter, 103 quinquies y 103 octies — Ayuda financiera de la Unión Europea — Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) n.o 543/2011 — Artículo 60 y anexo IX, punto 23 — Inversiones realizadas en explotaciones o instalaciones de la organización de productores — Concepto — Confianza legítima — Seguridad jurídica.#Asunto C-516/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Operational programme in the fruit and vegetables sector — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 — Articles 103b, 103d and 103g — EU financial aid — Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Article 60 and point 23 of Annex IX — Investments on the holdings and/or premises of the producer organisations — Concept — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case C-516/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Wyrok Trybunału (siódma izba) z dnia 20 grudnia 2017 r.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen przeciwko Agrarmarkt Austria.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Rolnictwo – Wspólna organizacja rynków – Program operacyjny w sektorze owoców i warzyw – Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1234/2007, zmienione rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 361/2008 – Artykuły 103d, 103e i 103g – Pomoc finansowa Unii Europejskiej – Rozporządzenie wykonawcze (UE) nr 543/2011 – Artykuł 60 i pkt 23 załącznika IX – Inwestycje realizowane w gospodarstwach lub pomieszczeniach należących do organizacji producentów – Pojęcie – Uzasadnione oczekiwania – Pewność prawa.#Sprawa C-516/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Operational programme in the fruit and vegetables sector — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 — Articles 103b, 103d and 103g — EU financial aid — Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Article 60 and point 23 of Annex IX — Investments on the holdings and/or premises of the producer organisations — Concept — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case C-516/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Sentenza della Corte (Settima Sezione) del 20 dicembre 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen contro Agrarmarkt Austria.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Agricoltura – Organizzazione comune dei mercati – Programma operativo nel settore degli ortofrutticoli – Regolamento (CE) n. 1234/2007, come modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 361/2008 – Articoli 103 ter, 103 quinquies e 103 octies – Aiuto finanziario dell’Unione europea – Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 543/2011 – Articolo 60 e allegato IX, punto 23 – Investimenti realizzati nelle aziende e/o nei locali dell’organizzazione di produttori – Nozione – Legittimo affidamento – Certezza del diritto.#Causa C-516/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Operational programme in the fruit and vegetables sector — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 — Articles 103b, 103d and 103g — EU financial aid — Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Article 60 and point 23 of Annex IX — Investments on the holdings and/or premises of the producer organisations — Concept — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case C-516/16.
DownloadOpen at official source
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (seitsemäs jaosto) 20.12.2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen vastaan Agrarmarkt Austria.#Bundesverwaltungsgerichtin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Maatalous – Yhteinen markkinajärjestely – Hedelmä- ja vihannesalan toimintaohjelma – Asetus (EY) N:o 1234/2007, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 361/2008 – 103 b artikla, 103 d artikla ja 103 g artikla – Euroopan unionin taloudellinen tuki – Täytäntöönpanoasetus (EU) N:o 543/2011 – 60 artikla ja liitteessä IX oleva 23 kohta – Tuottajaorganisaation tiloilla ja/tai toimitiloissa toteutetut investoinnit – Käsite – Luottamuksensuoja – Oikeusvarmuus.#Asia C-516/16.
judgment · 20 December 2017 · Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2017.#Erzeugerorganisation Tiefkühlgemüse eGen v Agrarmarkt Austria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Operational programme in the fruit and vegetables sector — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 361/2008 — Articles 103b, 103d and 103g — EU financial aid — Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 — Article 60 and point 23 of Annex IX — Investments on the holdings and/or premises of the producer organisations — Concept — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty.#Case C-516/16.
DownloadOpen at official source