PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

3,261 records

All countriesNetherlands · 2,143European Union · 815United States · 185Germany · 71United Kingdom · 43Search this topic

Records

Question· Schriftelijke vragen2026Z12983open

The report 'Medische kosten asylum seekers ruimschoots verdubbeld: ’Door achterstallige zorg kunnen ziektes zijn verergerd'

Original: Het bericht 'Medische kosten asielzoekers ruimschoots verdubbeld: ’Door achterstallige zorg kunnen ziektes zijn verergerd'

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 7 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

The report 'Medische kosten asylum seekers ruimschoots verdubbeld: ’Door achterstallige zorg kunnen ziektes zijn verergerd'

Record· Brief regering2026Z13158open

Beantwoording vragen commissie on the rapport Resultaten verantwoordingsonderzoek 2025 bij het ministry of asylum en Migratie (Kamerstuk 36945-XX-2)

Original: Beantwoording vragen commissie over het rapport Resultaten verantwoordingsonderzoek 2025 bij het Ministerie van Asiel en Migratie (Kamerstuk 36945-XX-2)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 6 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Beantwoording vragen commissie on the rapport Resultaten verantwoordingsonderzoek 2025 bij het ministry of asylum en Migratie (Kamerstuk 36945-XX-2)

Record· Brief regering2026Z02151concluded

Beleidsresponse to het rapport 'Goed Geregeld'- 'asylum reception als maatschappelijke opvang' van de adviesraad Migratie en de Raad van het Openbaar Bestuur (ROB)

Original: Beleidsreactie op het rapport 'Goed Geregeld'- 'Asielopvang als maatschappelijke opvang' van de adviesraad Migratie en de Raad van het Openbaar Bestuur (ROB)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 6 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Beleidsresponse to het rapport 'Goed Geregeld'- 'asylum reception als maatschappelijke opvang' van de adviesraad Migratie en de Raad van het Openbaar Bestuur (ROB)

Record· Brief regering2026Z01041concluded

Antwoorden op vragen commissie over o.a. de Geannoteerde agenda van de informele JBZ-Raad van 22-23 januari 2026 (Kamerstuk 32317-989) (asylum en Migratie)

Original: Antwoorden op vragen commissie over o.a. de Geannoteerde agenda van de informele JBZ-Raad van 22-23 januari 2026 (Kamerstuk 32317-989) (Asiel en Migratie)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 6 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Antwoorden op vragen commissie over o.a. de Geannoteerde agenda van de informele JBZ-Raad van 22-23 januari 2026 (Kamerstuk 32317-989) (asylum en Migratie)

Question· Schriftelijke vragen2026Z14027open

Het kabinetsplan om 75.000 asylum seekers aan werk te helpen

Original: Het kabinetsplan om 75.000 asielzoekers aan werk te helpen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 2 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Het kabinetsplan om 75.000 asylum seekers aan werk te helpen

Record· Brief regering2026Z08781concluded

Voortgang implementatie Europees asylum- en Migratiepact

Original: Voortgang implementatie Europees Asiel- en Migratiepact

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 26 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Voortgang implementatie Europees asylum- en Migratiepact

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182_RESdecided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 25. června 2026.#DL v. Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Naléhavé řízení o předběžné otázce – Přistěhovalecká politika – Navracení státních příslušníků třetích zemí neoprávněně pobývajících v členském státě – Směrnice 2008/115/ES – Článek 3 bod 3 – Cílová země – Článek 5 – Zásada nenavracení – Článek 15 – Zajištění za účelem vyhoštění – Přezkum dodržení podmínek zákonnosti – Okamžik posouzení dodržování zásady nenavracení – Rozhodnutí o navrácení, v němž je určeno více cílových zemí – Zajišťovací opatření – Určení cílové země – Nedostatečná spolupráce neoprávněně pobývajícího státního příslušníka třetí země – Článek 6, čl. 19 odst. 2 a článek 47 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie.#Věc C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182decided

Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 25 de junio de 2026.#DL contra Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Procedimiento prejudicial de urgencia — Política de inmigración — Retorno de los nacionales de terceros países en situación irregular en un Estado miembro — Directiva 2008/115/CE — Artículo 3, punto 3 — País de destino — Artículo 5 — Principio de no devolución — Artículo 15 — Internamiento a efectos de expulsión — Examen del cumplimiento de los requisitos de legalidad — Momento en el que ha de examinarse el respeto del principio de no devolución — Decisión de retorno en la que se designan varios posibles países de destino — Medida de internamiento — Determinación del país de destino — Falta de cooperación del nacional de un tercer país en situación irregular — Artículos 6, 19, apartado 2, y 47 de la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea.#Asunto C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1439in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1439 of 25 June 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for protocols between the Union and Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein supplementing their respective agreements and protocol concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in those countries, to include rules to enable their participation in Parts II and IV of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Chapters II and III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1359 of the European Parliament and of the Council

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 June 2026

Motion· Motie2026Z13481adopted

Motion by member Westerveld on the COA en gemeenten bijstaan bij het waarborgen van de veiligheid en privacy van asylum seekers en vrijwilligers

Original: Motie van het lid Westerveld over het COA en gemeenten bijstaan bij het waarborgen van de veiligheid en privacy van asielzoekers en vrijwilligers

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 23 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Westerveld on the COA en gemeenten bijstaan bij het waarborgen van de veiligheid en privacy van asylum seekers en vrijwilligers

Motion· Motie2026Z13469adopted

Motion by members Ceder en Diederik van Dijk over incidenten van religieus gemotiveerd geweld tegen asylum seekers binnen opvanglocaties registreren

Original: Motie van de leden Ceder en Diederik van Dijk over incidenten van religieus gemotiveerd geweld tegen asielzoekers binnen opvanglocaties registreren

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 23 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Ceder en Diederik van Dijk over incidenten van religieus gemotiveerd geweld tegen asylum seekers binnen opvanglocaties registreren

Bill· HRH.R. 885 (119th)referred

Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act

United States · United States Congress · 23 June 2026

Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act This bill directs the Department of State to designate four specified drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. (Among other things, such a designation allows the Department of the Treasury to require U.S. financial institutions to block transactions involving the organization.) The four specified cartels in the bill are the Gulf Cartel, the Cartel Del Noreste, the Cartel de Sinaloa, and the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion. The bill also requires the State Department to submit a detailed report on those four cartels and any other cartels it may identify. Based on this report, the State Department must designate as a foreign terrorist organization any such identified cartel (or faction thereof) that meets certain criteria for designation as a foreign terrorist organization. The bill specifies that it may not be construed to expand eligibility for asylum.

Question· Schriftelijke vragen2026Z12993open

The report 'Asielzoeker is dure zorgklant; Kosten zijn in vijf jaar tijd ruimschoots verdubbeld: "waarschijnlijk inhaalslag te maken"'

Original: Het bericht 'Asielzoeker is dure zorgklant; Kosten zijn in vijf jaar tijd ruimschoots verdubbeld: "waarschijnlijk inhaalslag te maken"'

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

The report 'Asielzoeker is dure zorgklant; Kosten zijn in vijf jaar tijd ruimschoots verdubbeld: "waarschijnlijk inhaalslag te maken"'

Bill· HRH.R. 1915 (119th)referred

Stop the Cartels Act

United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026

Stop the Cartels Act This bill addresses various issues relating to immigration, law enforcement cooperation with Mexico, and drug cartels. The bill bars federal financial assistance for state or local jurisdictions that (1) restrict compliance with immigration detainers issued by the Department of Homeland Security, or (2) have any law or policy that violates immigration laws. Furthermore, under this bill, the detention of alien minors must be governed by specified sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act and not any judicial decree or settlement. (A 1997 settlement agreement imposes requirements related to the treatment of such minors, including limits on how long they may be detained under certain conditions.) The bill also makes various changes to asylum applications, including by (1) increasing the burden that an asylum applicant must meet to establish a credible fear of persecution, and (2) establishing refugee application and processing centers in Central America. In addition, certain Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development assistance may not be made available to Mexico's government until the State Department certifies that Mexico has removed certain barriers to law enforcement cooperation and intelligence sharing between the United States and Mexico. The bill also establishes the foreign Special Transnational Criminal Organization designation and establishes penalties related to designated organizations, such as making it a crime to knowingly provide material support to such an organization. The State Department must designate specified organizations, including the Sinaloa Cartel, with the designation, and may designate other organizations that fit the bill's criteria.

Bill· HRH.R. 2974 (119th)referred

Training and Nutrition Stability

United States · United States Congress · 11 June 2026

Training and Nutrition Stability Act This bill excludes specific employment and training program funds from income when determining eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). As background, a household must have an income below a certain level to qualify for SNAP program benefits. Certain allowances, earnings, and payments do not count towards a household's income. Under this bill, examples of programs excluded from income include Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs, vocational rehabilitation programs, and refugee employment programs. This bill also removes the requirement that earnings from on-the-job training be considered earned income for purposes of determining SNAP eligibility.

Bill· Wetgeving2025Z22479adopted

Wijziging van de Vreemdelingenwet 2000 en enkele andere wetten in verband met de uitvoering en implementatie van het EU-asylum- en migratiepact 2026 (Uitvoerings- en implementatiewet asylum- en migratiepact 2026)

Original: Wijziging van de Vreemdelingenwet 2000 en enkele andere wetten in verband met de uitvoering en implementatie van het EU-Asiel- en migratiepact 2026 (Uitvoerings- en implementatiewet Asiel- en migratiepact 2026)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Wijziging van de Vreemdelingenwet 2000 en enkele andere wetten in verband met de uitvoering en implementatie van het EU-asylum- en migratiepact 2026 (Uitvoerings- en implementatiewet asylum- en migratiepact 2026)

Bill· HRH.R. 175 (119th)reported

Deport Alien Gang Members Act

United States · United States Congress · 6 June 2026

Deport Alien Gang Members Act This bill makes non-U.S. nationals ( aliens under federal law) associated with criminal gangs inadmissible for entry into the United States and deportable. The bill also establishes procedures to designate groups as criminal gangs. An individual shall be inadmissible if certain officers or agencies know or have reason to believe that the individual is or was a criminal gang member or has participated or aided such a group's illegal activities. An individual who is or was a member of such a gang, has participated or aided such a group's illegal activities, or seeks to enter or has entered the United States in furtherance of such activity shall be deportable. Such individuals must be subject to mandatory detention. Furthermore, such individuals shall not be eligible for (1) asylum; (2) temporary protected status; (3) special immigrant juvenile visas; or (4) parole, unless they are assisting the government in a law enforcement matter. The bill defines a criminal gang as a group of five or more persons (1) where one of its primary purposes is committing specified criminal offenses and its members have engaged in a continuing series of such offenses within the past five years, or (2) that has been designated as a criminal gang by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The bill also establishes procedures for DHS to designate a group as a criminal gang, including notifying Congress, publishing a notice in the Federal Register, and providing an opportunity for the group to petition for review of the designation.

Motion· Motie2026Z10694adopted

Amended motion by member Diederik van Dijk c.s. over maatregelen om de screening van asylum seekers binnen de norm van de EU-screeningsverordening te laten plaatsvinden (t.v.v. 35501-37)

Original: Gewijzigde motie van het lid Diederik van Dijk c.s. over maatregelen om de screening van asielzoekers binnen de norm van de EU-screeningsverordening te laten plaatsvinden (t.v.v. 35501-37)

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 4 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Amended motion by member Diederik van Dijk c.s. over maatregelen om de screening van asylum seekers binnen de norm van de EU-screeningsverordening te laten plaatsvinden (t.v.v. 35501-37)

Motion· Motie2026Z11741rejected

Motion by member Schenk over aanvullende maatregelen om te voorkomen dat aan een andere lidstaat overgedragen asylum seekers Nederland opnieuw binnenkomen

Original: Motie van het lid Schenk over aanvullende maatregelen om te voorkomen dat aan een andere lidstaat overgedragen asielzoekers Nederland opnieuw binnenkomen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 4 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Schenk over aanvullende maatregelen om te voorkomen dat aan een andere lidstaat overgedragen asylum seekers Nederland opnieuw binnenkomen

Motion· Motie2026Z11742rejected

Motion by member Schenk over in kaart brengen hoe vaak asylum seekers die aan een andere lidstaat zijn overgedragen binnen één jaar opnieuw in Nederland worden aangetroffen

Original: Motie van het lid Schenk over in kaart brengen hoe vaak asielzoekers die aan een andere lidstaat zijn overgedragen binnen één jaar opnieuw in Nederland worden aangetroffen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 4 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Schenk over in kaart brengen hoe vaak asylum seekers die aan een andere lidstaat zijn overgedragen binnen één jaar opnieuw in Nederland worden aangetroffen

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0198_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 4 juin 2026.#S contre Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Directive 2013/32/UE – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Examen complet et ex nunc – Étendue des pouvoirs de la juridiction de première instance – Examen par la juridiction de première instance des faits – Examen par la juridiction de première instance des besoins de protection internationale.#Affaire C-198/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0440_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#PM and Others v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – ‘Well-founded fear of being persecuted’ – Assessment.#Case C-440/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0198decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#S v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank den Haag zittingsplaats Zwolle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal.#Case C-198/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0440decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#PM and Others v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – ‘Well-founded fear of being persecuted’ – Assessment.#Case C-440/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0621decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 2(g) – Material reception conditions – Article 17(2) – Requirement as to a guaranteed adequate standard of living – Applicant for international protection subject to a transfer decision – Provision of the material reception conditions excluding benefits in kind covering clothing, everyday items and consumables, and without payment of the financial allowance intended to cover basic personal needs – Article 20(1)(c) – Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions due to the lodging of a subsequent application – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Applicability – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Procedure for determining the responsible Member State.#Case C-621/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Motion· Motie2026Z10980rejected

Motion by member Markuszower over asylum seekers en statushouders alleen in gemeenten huisvesten waar een meerderheid van de inwoners ermee instemt

Original: Motie van het lid Markuszower over asielzoekers en statushouders alleen in gemeenten huisvesten waar een meerderheid van de inwoners ermee instemt

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 2 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Markuszower over asylum seekers en statushouders alleen in gemeenten huisvesten waar een meerderheid van de inwoners ermee instemt

Motion· Motie2026Z10979rejected

Motion by members Markuszower en Lammers over zorgen dat echte vluchtelingen voortaan uitsluitend in de eigen regio worden opgevangen

Original: Motie van de leden Markuszower en Lammers over zorgen dat echte vluchtelingen voortaan uitsluitend in de eigen regio worden opgevangen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 2 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Markuszower en Lammers over zorgen dat echte vluchtelingen voortaan uitsluitend in de eigen regio worden opgevangen

Motion· Motie2026Z10969adopted

Motion by member Klaver over geen akkoorden sluiten met politici die oproepen tot geweld tegen vluchtelingen of de omvolkingstheorie verspreiden

Original: Motie van het lid Klaver over geen akkoorden sluiten met politici die oproepen tot geweld tegen vluchtelingen of de omvolkingstheorie verspreiden

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 2 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Klaver over geen akkoorden sluiten met politici die oproepen tot geweld tegen vluchtelingen of de omvolkingstheorie verspreiden

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1213in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1213 of 29 May 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, at its 20th meeting, concerning conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of certain Parties to that Convention and concerning the election of members of the Group of experts on action against violence against women and domestic violence, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 May 2026

Bill· SS. 2742 (118th)open

Fort Ontario Holocaust Refugee Shelter National Historical Park Establishment Act

United States · United States Congress · 28 May 2026

Fort Ontario National Monument Establishment Act This bill establishes the Fort Ontario National Monument in Oswego, New York, as a unit of the National Park System. The site shall preserve, protect, and interpret the history of (1) Indigenous people who once inhabited the land on which Fort Ontario is located, (2) Fort Ontario and its previous fortifications, and (3) refugees from World War II who were housed at Fort Ontario. 

Bill· HRH.R. 3466 (119th)open

SMART Act

United States · United States Congress · 22 May 2026

Securing Migration, Addressing Reform, and Talent Retention Act or the SMART Act This bill modifies the U.S. immigration system, including by eliminating the diversity and employment-based visa systems, establishing a points-based system, and capping other immigration categories. The diversity visa program—which makes visas available to individuals from countries that send fewer immigrants—is eliminated. The bill caps annual refugee admission at 50,000. Currently, the President sets annual limits. The bill limits the current family-sponsored immigration system by lowering the annual cap and narrowing the qualifications by, for example, lowering the age limit of qualifying children and eliminating siblings as a qualifying relationship. The bill also disqualifies noncitizen parents of adult U.S. citizens from this category and creates a new nonimmigrant visa for such parents. This visa has an initial authorization period of five years and may be extended for additional five-year periods. The bill also eliminates the employment-based visa system and replaces it with a points-based system. Points are awarded on the basis of characteristics such as age, education, English proficiency, the salary of prospective employment, investment in and management of a new commercial enterprise, and number of dependent children. Visas are awarded to the applicants with the most points (and their immediate family members) until the annual cap is reached. The bill also revises the H-1B visa program to award visas in order of compensation rate. The bill also creates a visa for immigrants who invest at least $5 million into a new commercial enterprise.

PreviousPage 4 of 66Next