PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union

Records

48,120 ingested records from European Union. Walk years back as far as this source still publishes.

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0738decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online general search services – Market for the licensing of smart mobile operating systems – Market for online app stores for the Android mobile operating system – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Contractual restrictions – Tying – Exclusionary effects – Relevance of context – Counterfactual scenario – As-efficient competitor – Payments subject to exclusive pre-installation – Obstruction of the development and distribution of Android forks – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-738/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0427decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV v Diagramm Halbach GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – Obligations of distributors before making a device available on the market – Identification wristbands intended to be worn by patients in the healthcare sector – No CE marking and no EU declaration of conformity – Concept of ‘medical device’ – Concept of ‘intended purpose’.#Case C-427/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0042_INFdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0591_INFdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Sandoz AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale ARYUNA – Marques Benelux et nationale verbales antérieures ARMUNIA – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Éléments de preuve présentés pour la première fois devant le Tribunal ».#Affaire T-591/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0041_INFdecided

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0424_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0493_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-493/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0615decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Veikkaus Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0042decided

Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 1. Juli 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das einen Lampenschirm darstellt – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Nichterfüllung der Schutzvoraussetzungen – Art. 25 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 6/2002 – Fehlende Eigenart – Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002.#Rechtssache T-42/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0361decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods.#Case T-361/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0041decided

Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 1. Juli 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das eine elektrische Lichterkette darstellt – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Nichterfüllung der Schutzvoraussetzungen – Art. 25 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 6/2002 – Fehlende Eigenart – Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002.#Rechtssache T-41/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0173decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.#Case T-173/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0591decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0040_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0424decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0493decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-493/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0105decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0415decided

Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#KH contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Recrutement – Concours interne COM/AST4/2023 – Décision d’exclure le requérant du concours – Absence de participation à l’épreuve orale pour des raisons de santé – Devoir de sollicitude – Principe de bonne administration – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-415/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0100decided

Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0105_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0615_RESdecided

A Törvényszék ítélete (hetedik tanács), 2026. július 1‑je.#Veikkaus Oy kontra az Európai Unió Szellemi Tulajdoni Hivatala.#Európai uniós védjegy – A FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS európai uniós szóvédjegy bejelentése – Feltétlen kizáró ok – Megkülönböztető képesség hiánya – Az (EU) 2017/1001 rendelet 7. cikke (1) bekezdésének b) pontja – A védjegy használat révén megszerzett megkülönböztető képességgel rendelkező eleme – A 2017/1001 rendelet 7. cikkének (3) bekezdése.#T-615/25. sz. ügy.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2026

Record· COCELEX 62026CO0278_INFdecided

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 30 juin 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-278/26 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62026TO0108(01)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026.#QS v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-108/26 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0555decided

Определение на Съда (осми състав) от 30 юни 2026 г.#RL срещу AL.#Преюдициално запитване — Член 53, параграф 2 и член 94 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Изискване да се посочи връзката между разпоредбите от правото на Съюза, чието тълкуване се иска, и приложимото национално законодателство — Липса на достатъчно точни сведения — Явна недопустимост.#Дело C-555/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62026CO0278decided

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0872decided

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0255_SUMdecided

Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (siedma komora) z 29. júna 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) proti Perifereia Attikis.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Článok 99 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Odpoveď, ktorú možno jednoznačne vyvodiť z judikatúry – Schéma súkromnej investičnej pomoci – Schéma pomoci zlučiteľná s vnútorným trhom – Zamietnutie poskytnutia pomoci v rámci tejto schémy príslušným orgánom – Žaloba o neplatnosť tohto zamietavého rozhodnutia – Retroaktívny účinok prípadného súdneho zrušenia uvedeného zamietavého rozhodnutia – Uplynutie lehoty stanovenej pre poskytnutie pomoci v rámci uvedenej schémy pomoci v priebehu súdneho konania – Dátum, ku ktorému sa príslušná pomoc považuje za poskytnutú – Článok 47 Charty základných práv Európskej únie – Právo na účinný prostriedok nápravy pred súdom – Nariadenie (EÚ) 2015/1589 – Článok 1 – Existujúca pomoc.#Vec C-255/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0255decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0609decided

Определение на Съда (осми състав) от 29 юни 2026 г.#„Е.М.“ ** срещу A.М.А.#Преюдициално запитване — Член 53, параграф 2 и член 100, параграф 2 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Спор в главното производство с отпаднал предмет — Липса на основание за произнасяне.#Дело C-609/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62026CO0037decided

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 26 juin 2026.#Procédure pénale contre XD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel et réglementaire du litige au principal ainsi que des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-37/26.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182_RESdecided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 25. června 2026.#DL v. Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Naléhavé řízení o předběžné otázce – Přistěhovalecká politika – Navracení státních příslušníků třetích zemí neoprávněně pobývajících v členském státě – Směrnice 2008/115/ES – Článek 3 bod 3 – Cílová země – Článek 5 – Zásada nenavracení – Článek 15 – Zajištění za účelem vyhoštění – Přezkum dodržení podmínek zákonnosti – Okamžik posouzení dodržování zásady nenavracení – Rozhodnutí o navrácení, v němž je určeno více cílových zemí – Zajišťovací opatření – Určení cílové země – Nedostatečná spolupráce neoprávněně pobývajícího státního příslušníka třetí země – Článek 6, čl. 19 odst. 2 a článek 47 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie.#Věc C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182decided

Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 25 de junio de 2026.#DL contra Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Procedimiento prejudicial de urgencia — Política de inmigración — Retorno de los nacionales de terceros países en situación irregular en un Estado miembro — Directiva 2008/115/CE — Artículo 3, punto 3 — País de destino — Artículo 5 — Principio de no devolución — Artículo 15 — Internamiento a efectos de expulsión — Examen del cumplimiento de los requisitos de legalidad — Momento en el que ha de examinarse el respeto del principio de no devolución — Decisión de retorno en la que se designan varios posibles países de destino — Medida de internamiento — Determinación del país de destino — Falta de cooperación del nacional de un tercer país en situación irregular — Artículos 6, 19, apartado 2, y 47 de la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea.#Asunto C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0343decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie (CPAM) de la Gironde v LX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Scope – point (a) of Article 3(1) – National legislation laying down the conditions for access to the non-standard-fee sector by self-employed doctors – Doctor who has obtained a qualification within a hospital located in another Member State – Requirement of two years’ experience as an ‘assistant des hôpitaux’ pursuing his or her activity within that hospital under an employment contract – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment.#Case C-343/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0277decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#Helpfind Funding SARL and Others v Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji ALLIANZ Polska S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 1(2) and Articles 3, 18 and 28 – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Assignment to a professional of claims arising from insurance against civil liability in respect of motor vehicles by persons who have suffered material damage as a result of road traffic accidents – Legal standing of the assignee to enforce the payment of the assigned claim from the insurance undertakings concerned.#Case C-277/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

PreviousPage 5 of 963Next