PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union

Records

48,120 ingested records from European Union. Walk years back as far as this source still publishes.

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0661_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0529decided

Rozsudek Tribunálu (třetího senátu) ze dne 15. července 2026.#Kverulant.org o. p. s. v. Evropský parlament.#Přístup k dokumentům – Nařízení (ES) č. 1049/2001 – Dokumenty týkající se platů a náhrad poslanců zvolených za Českou republiku – Částečné odepření přístupu – Výjimka týkající se ochrany soukromí a osobnosti jednotlivce – Článek 4 odst. 1 písm. b) nařízení č. 1049/2001 – Ochrana osobních údajů – Nezbytnost předání osobních údajů pro konkrétní účel ve veřejném zájmu – Článek 9 odst. 1 nařízení (EU) 2018/1725.#Věc T-529/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0588decided

Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#OT contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-588/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0310decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Úsovsko Agro s. r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Agricultural sector – Aid schemes for large enterprises in the primary agricultural sector in the Czech Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – European Union Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014 to 2020 – Presence of an incentive effect – Proportionality – Ex post consideration of a counterfactual scenario.#Case T-310/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0261decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-261/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0555decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0666decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Teva Pharma BV v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document from a scientific advice procedure for the medicinal product ferric carboxymaltose – Decision to grant a third party partial access to the document – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-666/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0256decided

Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#RMC-Consulting Sàrl e.a. contre Parlement européen.#Clause compromissoire – Extension et remise à niveau du bâtiment Konrad Adenauer à Luxembourg – Contrat de services portant sur le suivi de travaux au titre du génie technique – Retard du chantier – Imputabilité – Refus du Parlement de régler certaines factures – Non-lieu à statuer partiel.#Affaire T-256/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0268decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#Sampension Livsforsikring A/S v Skatteministeriet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable persons – VAT group – Concept of ‘persons closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links’ – Measures to prevent tax evasion or avoidance – Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Legislation of a Member State making it possible to include in a VAT group persons which are not taxable or are exempt from VAT – Condition of 100% ownership of the capital of the other members of the group in order for a VAT group to be formed.#Case T-268/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0562decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#XXX v Hauptzollamt München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Concept of ‘energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels’ – First indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Directive 2003/96/EC – Propane used for the testing of burners.#Case T-562/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0661decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0492decided

Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 15 juillet 2026.#Dimitry Aleksandrovich Beloglazov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Restriction en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous h), i), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Notion de “personne qui facilite des violations de l’interdiction de contournement” des mesures restrictives – Critère fondé sur un comportement susceptible de constituer une infraction pénale – Champ d’application territorial du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Sécurité juridique – Proportionnalité – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-492/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-10-2026-002987answered

Palestinian assistance

European Union · European Parliament · 13 August 2026

Record· COCELEX 62026CO0111decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#Voice - Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0474_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2026.#AR and Others v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Material scope – Articles 5 and 6 – Principles relating to processing and the lawfulness of processing – Article 9 – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Article 10 – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Combating doping in sport – Online publication of the name of a person who has infringed anti-doping rules, the length of time for which that person is banned from participating in sporting events and the reasons for that ban – Balancing of interests – Proportionality – Article 77 – Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority where such publication is imminent.#Case C-474/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0474decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2026.#AR and Others v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Material scope – Articles 5 and 6 – Principles relating to processing and the lawfulness of processing – Article 9 – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Article 10 – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Combating doping in sport – Online publication of the name of a person who has infringed anti-doping rules, the length of time for which that person is banned from participating in sporting events and the reasons for that ban – Balancing of interests – Proportionality – Article 77 – Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority where such publication is imminent.#Case C-474/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62026TO0236(01)decided

Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 13 juillet 2026.#RY contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Référé – Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Décision de la BEI refusant la demande de la requérante de télétravail à plein temps depuis Paris et lui proposant des aménagements raisonnables – Article 5 de la directive 2000/78/CE – Demande de sursis à exécution et de mesures provisoires – Fumus boni juris – Urgence – Mise en balance des intérêts.#Affaire T-236/26 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 July 2026

Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-10-2026-002875answered

Missbrauch von ARF-Geldern

European Union · European Parliament · 5 August 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0574decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2026.#Balneari Rimini v Comune di Rimini.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(a) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 12(1) and (2) – Directive 2014/23/EU – Scope – Concessions of State-owned coastal land used for tourism and recreational purposes – Action for damages – Legislation providing for the automatic extension of those concessions – Scarcity of natural resources – Authority competent to assess such scarcity.#Case C-574/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62026TO0084decided

Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 10 juillet 2026.#Rotex Europe Ltd contre Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 226 du règlement de procédure – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Fiscalité – Système commun de TVA – Droit à déduction – Article 167, article 168, sous a), et article 178 de la directive 2006/112/CE – Obligations jugées nécessaires pour assurer l’exacte perception de la TVA et éviter la fraude – Article 273 de la directive 2006/112 – Biens acquis par un assujetti avant son enregistrement à la TVA – Réglementation nationale subordonnant la déduction de la TVA à la présence physique des biens à la date d’enregistrement – Proportionnalité – Principe de neutralité fiscale.#Affaire T-84/26.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0788_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds contre Anne Frank Stichting e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Propriété intellectuelle – Droit d’auteur et droits voisins – Directive 2001/29/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “communication au public” – Article 6, paragraphe 3 – Mesures techniques efficaces – Œuvre tombée dans le domaine public dans certains États membres et encore protégée par un droit d’auteur dans un autre État membre – Publication de cette œuvre sur un site Internet – Mesure de blocage géographique destinée à empêcher l’accès à ce site à partir de l’État membre dans lequel l’œuvre est encore protégée – Possibilité de contourner cette mesure au moyen d’un réseau privé virtuel [virtual private network (VPN)] ou d’un service similaire.#Affaire C-788/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0888_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Adão da Fonseca-Engenheiros Consultores, Lda contre Metro do Porto, S.A. et Betar Consultores, Lda.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 82 – Procédure relative à un concours – Absence d’audition préalable des candidats – Protection de l’anonymat – Droit d’être entendu.#Affaire C-888/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0234_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH contre Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Droits des consommateurs – Directive 2011/83/CE – Exceptions au droit de rétractation – Contrats de fourniture de contenus numériques non fournis sur un support matériel – Article 16, premier alinéa, sous m) – Abonnement à un service de diffusion en continu (streaming) – Fourniture de services numériques – Offre présentant un caractère dynamique allant au-delà de la seule mise à disposition stable et, le cas échéant, continue de contenus spécifiques.#Affaire C-234/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0199_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0242_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0428_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ROGON GmbH & Co. KG and Others v Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Regulations of a national football federation – Purchase of services from third parties outside that federation – Activity of the players’ agents – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Exception to the prohibition in Article 101(1) TFEU – Scope – Objectives pursued by those regulations – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-428/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

PreviousPage 3 of 963Next