PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Question · QUESTION_WRITTEN

E-10-2026-002818

Application of the ‘continuous, systematic and grave human rights violations’ standard under the EU-Colombia-Ecuador-Peru Trade Agreement

Original

answeredEuropean Union· European Parliament· EN

Introduced

8 July 2026

Last action

21 August 2026 · Answer

Status

answered

Sponsors

Martin GÜNTHER

Subjects

European Union

Source updated

21 August 2026

European Union

Timeline

  1. 8 July 2026

    Written question

    Application of the ‘continuous, systematic and grave human rights violations’ standard under the EU-Colombia-Ecuador-Peru Trade Agreement

    Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN

  2. 21 August 2026

    Answer

    Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

5 official files

  • Application of the ‘continuous, systematic and grave human rights violations’ standard under the EU-Colombia-Ecuador-Peru Trade Agreement

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 17 July 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Application of the ‘continuous, systematic and grave human rights violations’ standard under the EU-Colombia-Ecuador-Peru Trade Agreement

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · EN · 17 July 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER · 21 August 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Anwendung des Kriteriums anhaltender, systematischer und schwerer Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Rahmen des Handelsabkommens zwischen der EU, Kolumbien, Ecuador und Peru

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 17 July 2026

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Anwendung des Kriteriums anhaltender, systematischer und schwerer Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Rahmen des Handelsabkommens zwischen der EU, Kolumbien, Ecuador und Peru

    QUESTION_WRITTEN · DE · 17 July 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.