PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Digitalisation

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

727 records

All countriesNetherlands · 461Germany · 149United States · 69European Union · 47United Kingdom · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· Brief regering2026Z17607open

Planningsbrief regarding Digitalisering 2026-2027

Original: Planningsbrief inzake Digitalisering 2026-2027

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 1 September 2026

Translated from Dutch

Planningsbrief regarding Digitalisering 2026-2027

Record· Overig2026Z17381concluded

Report of a legislative consultation, held on June 18, 2026, on the 2025 Annual Reports and Final Acts of the Ministries of Economic Affairs, BZK and JenV as far as topics related to digitalization are concerned

Original: Verslag van een wetgevingsoverleg, gehouden op 18 juni 2026, over de Jaarverslagen en Slotwetten 2025 van de ministeries EZ, BZK en JenV voor zover het onderwerpen betreft die zien op digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 28 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Report of a legislative consultation, held on June 18, 2026, on the 2025 Annual Reports and Final Acts of the Ministries of Economic Affairs, BZK and JenV as far as topics related to digitalization are concerned

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/7509open

Digitalization of administrative services

Original: Digitalisierung von Verwaltungsdienstleistungen

Germany · German Bundestag · 28 August 2026

Translated from German

Record· Brief regering2026Z16081open

Motions and commitments in the field of digitalization

Original: Moties en toezeggingen op het gebied van digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motions and commitments in the field of digitalization

Motion· Motie2026Z13683adopted

Motion by member Vermeer about providing the House with further information about the Dutch Digitalization Strategy before Budget Day

Original: Motie van het lid Vermeer over de Kamer voor Prinsjesdag nader informeren over de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Vermeer about providing the House with further information about the Dutch Digitalization Strategy before Budget Day

Motion· Motie2025Z09354adopted

Motion by Member Van Nispen on algorithms that may use risk profiling and publish automated selection tools in the Algorithm Register

Original: Motie van het lid Van Nispen over algoritmes die mogelijk gebruikmaken van risicoprofilering en geautomatiseerde selectie-instrumenten in het Algoritmeregister publiceren

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by Member Van Nispen on algorithms that may use risk profiling and publish automated selection tools in the Algorithm Register

Motion· Motie2025Z00456adopted

Motion by members Omtzigt and Six Dijkstra on a scientific standard for models and algorithms that are enforceably public and imitable

Original: Motie van de leden Omtzigt en Six Dijkstra over een wetenschappelijke standaard voor modellen en algoritmes die afdwingbaar openbaar en navolgbaar zijn

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Omtzigt and Six Dijkstra on a scientific standard for models and algorithms that are enforceably public and imitable

Motion· Motie2025Z18072adopted

Motion by member Kathmann et al. about incorporating the recommendations from Our Digital Foundation into the follow-up to the Dutch Digitalization Strategy

Original: Motie van het lid Kathmann c.s. over de aanbevelingen uit Ons Digitaal Fundament verwerken in het vervolg op de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Kathmann et al. about incorporating the recommendations from Our Digital Foundation into the follow-up to the Dutch Digitalization Strategy

Record· Brief van lid/fractie/commissie2025Z12161concluded

Verzoek van het lid Valize (PVV) om een commissiebrief regarding de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie (NDS) te sturen aan de staatssecretaris BZK

Original: Verzoek van het lid Valize (PVV) om een commissiebrief inzake de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie (NDS) te sturen aan de staatssecretaris BZK

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 19 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Verzoek van het lid Valize (PVV) om een commissiebrief regarding de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie (NDS) te sturen aan de staatssecretaris BZK

Bill· SS. 1587 (104th)referred

Encrypted Communications Privacy Act of 1996

United States · United States Congress · 10 August 2026

Encrypted Communications Privacy Act of 1996 - Allows any person within any State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any U.S. territory or possession and any U.S. person in a foreign country to use any encryption, regardless of encryption algorithm selected, key length chosen, or implementation technique or medium used, with exceptions. Specifies that nothing in this Act shall be construed to: (1) require the use of any form of encryption; or (2) limit or affect the ability of any person to use encryption without a key escrow function or of any person who chooses to use encryption with a key escrow function not to use a key holder. Amends the Federal criminal code to subject to criminal penalties and civil liability any key holder who, without authorization, releases a decryption key or provides decryption assistance. Makes it a complete defense against any such civil or criminal action that the defendant acted in good faith reliance upon a court warrant or order, grand jury or trial subpoena, or statutory authorization. Directs the Attorney General and other specified officials to report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on the number of orders and extensions served on key holders to obtain access to decryption keys or decryption assistance. Sets penalties for willfully endeavoring by means of encryption to obstruct, impede, or prevent the communication of information in furtherance of a felony to an investigative or law enforcement officer. Allows any person within any State to sell in interstate commerce any encryption. Grants the Secretary of Commerce exclusive authority to control exports of all computer hardware, software, and technology for information security (including encryption), except computer hardware, software, and technology specifically designed or modified for military use. Prohibits requiring any validated license (with limited exceptions) for the export or reexport of any: (1) software, including software with encryption capabilities, that is generally available as is, that is designed for installation by the purchaser, or that is in the public domain or publicly available because it is generally accessible to the public in any form; or (2) computing device solely because it incorporates or employs in any form software (including software with encryption capabilities) exempted from any such requirement for a validated license. Directs the Secretary to authorize the export or reexport of: (1) software with encryption capabilities for nonmilitary end-uses in any country to which exports of software of similar capability are permitted for use by financial institutions not controlled in fact by U.S. persons, unless there is substantial evidence that such software will be diverted to a military end-use or an end-use supporting international terrorism, modified for military or terrorist end-use, or reexported without requisite U.S. authorization; and (2) computer hardware with encryption capabilities if the Secretary determines that a product offering comparable security is commercially available from a foreign supplier without effective restrictions outside the United States. Declares that nothing in this Act: (1) constitutes authority for the conduct of intelligence activity; and (2) shall affect specified conduct by Federal officers or employees related to communications security and communications by or among foreign powers or agents.

Bill· SS. 376 (105th)open

Encrypted Communications Privacy Act of 1997

United States · United States Congress · 10 August 2026

Encrypted Communications Privacy Act of 1997 - Allows any person within any State and any U.S. person in a foreign country to use any encryption, regardless of encryption algorithm selected, key length chosen, or implementation technique or medium used, with exceptions. Prohibits the Federal Government or a State from requiring as a sale condition that a decryption key be given to another person. Specifies that nothing in this Act shall be construed to: (1) require the use of any form of encryption; or (2) limit or affect the ability of any person to use encryption without a key escrow function or of any person who chooses to use encryption with a key escrow function not to use a key holder. Amends the Federal criminal code to subject to criminal penalties and civil liability any key holder who, without authorization, releases a decryption key or provides decryption assistance. Makes it a complete defense against any such civil or criminal action that the defendant acted in good faith reliance upon a court warrant or order, grand jury or trial subpoena, or statutory authorization. Authorizes a key holder to release a decryption key or provide decryption assistance to a governmental entity requiring the disclosure of stored wire and electronic communications and transactional records, as well as stored electronic information, as long as appropriate court order requirements are met. Directs the Attorney General and other specified officials to report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on the number of orders and extensions served on key holders to obtain access to decryption keys or decryption assistance. Sets penalties for willfully endeavoring by means of encryption to obstruct, impede, or prevent the communication to an investigative or law enforcement officer of information in furtherance of a felony. Allows any person within any State to sell any encryption in interstate commerce. Grants the Secretary of Commerce exclusive authority to control exports of all computer hardware, software, and technology for information security (including encryption), except computer hardware, software, and technology specifically designed or modified for military use. Prohibits requiring any validated license (with limited exceptions) for the export or reexport of any: (1) software, including software with encryption capabilities, that is generally available as is, and designed for installation by the purchaser, or that is in the public domain or publicly available because it is generally accessible to the public in any form; (2) computing device solely because it incorporates or employs in any form software (including software with encryption capabilities) exempted from any such requirement for a validated license; (3) software or hardware otherwise restricted because it incorporates interface mechanisms for interaction with other software and hardware; or (4) encryption technology related to a device, software, or hardware described in (1) through (3) above. Directs the Secretary to authorize the export or reexport of software, hardware, and technology with encryption capabilities under a license exception if: (1) a product offering comparable security is commercially available from a foreign supplier without effective restrictions; (2) a comparable product is generally available in a foreign country; or (3) the sole basis for otherwise withholding the license exception is the employment of encryption from a foreign source. Directs the Secretary to prohibit the export or reexport of any computer software, hardware, and technology to a foreign country if the Secretary determines that there is substantial evidence that such equipment or technology will be: (1) diverted to a military end- use or a use supporting international terrorism; (2) modified for such uses; or (3) reexported without U.S. authorization. Prohibits any investigative or law enforcement officer or key holder from releasing a decryption key or providing decryption assistance to a foreign country, with an exception when the United States has entered into a treaty or convention with a foreign country to provide mutual decryption assistance. Declares that nothing in this Act: (1) constitutes authority for the conduct of intelligence activity; and (2) shall affect specified conduct by Federal officers or employees related to communications security and communications by or among foreign powers or agents.

Question· Mündliche Frage21/1483open

Stand der Digitalisierung des Stromsystems

Germany · German Bundestag · 6 August 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Wie ist nach Kenntnis der Bundesregierung der Stand der Digitalisierung des Stromsystems, insbesondere des Smart-Meter-Rollouts, in Deutschland, und welche konkreten kurz- und langfristigen Maßnahmen leitet die Bundesregierung hieraus ab?

Bill· SS. 1748 (119th)reported

Kids Online Safety Act

United States · United States Congress · 6 August 2026

Kids Online Safety Act This bill requires covered online platforms, including social media platforms, to implement tools and safeguards to protect users and visitors under the age of 17. Covered platforms are online platforms, video games, messaging applications, or video streaming services used or likely to be used by individuals under the age of 17, with specified exceptions.&nbsp; The bill generally requires covered platforms to exercise reasonable care in the design and use of features that increase minors’ online activity in order to prevent and mitigate harm to minors (e.g., mental health disorders and severe harassment). &nbsp; Covered platforms are also required to provide certain safeguards to minors, such as protections for minors’ data; tools for parents of minors, such as access to minors’ privacy settings; and a mechanism for account&nbsp;holders and visitors to report harm to minors on the platform.&nbsp; Covered platforms are prohibited from conducting market or product research on children under the age of 13, and may only conduct such research on those under the age of 17 with parental consent.&nbsp; The bill provides for enforcement through the Federal Trade Commission and states.&nbsp; The bill also requires online platforms to meet certain requirements before using algorithms that select, order, or prioritize information presented to users based on user-specific data not provided for that purpose. Specifically, such platforms must (1) provide users with notice of the use of such algorithms, and (2) permit users to switch to an algorithm&nbsp;that does not rely on such user-specific data.&nbsp;

Motion· Motie2024Z08441adopted

Motion by members Bruyning and Paternotte on research into the desirability of an implementation test aimed at the perspective of the BES islands

Original: Motie van de leden Bruyning en Paternotte over onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid van een uitvoeringstoets gericht op het perspectief van de BES-eilanden

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 3 August 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Bruyning and Paternotte on research into the desirability of an implementation test aimed at the perspective of the BES islands

Motion· Motie2025Z13165adopted

Motion by member Peter de Groot about coming up with a plan on how residents of ground-level social rental housing are given the right to purchase

Original: Motie van het lid Peter de Groot over met een plan komen hoe bewoners van een grondgebonden sociale huurwoningen recht op koop krijgen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 31 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Peter de Groot about coming up with a plan on how residents of ground-level social rental housing are given the right to purchase

Motion· Motie2023Z02735adopted

Motion by member Rajkowski et al. on reconsidering the transfer of personal data and government data to countries outside the EEA and opting for a European cloud initiative

Original: Motie van het lid Rajkowski c.s. over het heroverwegen van de doorgifte van persoonsgegevens en overheidsdata naar landen buiten de EER en het kiezen voor een Europees cloudinitiatief

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 30 July 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Rajkowski et al. on reconsidering the transfer of personal data and government data to countries outside the EEA and opting for a European cloud initiative

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/4848open

Ausschöpfung des Förderprogramms zur Digitalisierung in Pflegeeinrichtungen

Germany · German Bundestag · 21 July 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Hat die Bundesregierung Erkenntnisse über den Stand der Ausschöpfung des Förderprogramms zur Digitalisierung in Pflegeeinrichtungen gemäß § 8 Absatz 8 des Elften Buches Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB XI; bitte Gesamtvolumina und Restmittel angeben), und wenn ja, worin liegen nach Auffassung der Bundesregierung die Ursachen für die verbleibenden Restmittel und die Verlängerung des Förderzeitraums (www.dak.de/presse/bundesthemen/politik-unternehmensnachrichten/digitalisierung-70-prozent-der-pflegeeinrichtungen-fehlt-anbindung-an-telematikinfrastruktur_146652)?

Bill· HRH.R. 1709 (119th)referred

Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act

United States · United States Congress · 10 July 2026

Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act This bill requires the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to examine and report on the cybersecurity of mobile service networks and the vulnerability of these networks and mobile devices to cyberattacks and surveillance conducted by adversaries. The report must include, among other items,&nbsp;(1) an assessment of the degree to which mobile service providers have addressed certain cybersecurity vulnerabilities; (2) a discussion of the degree to which these providers have implemented cybersecurity best practices and risk assessment frameworks; and (3) an estimate of the prevalence and efficacy of encryption and authentication algorithms and techniques.

Bill· SS. 2997 (119th)referred

Right to Override Act

United States · United States Congress · 8 July 2026

Right to Override Act This bill requires employers of health care professionals to allow such professionals to override artificial intelligence clinical decision support systems. It also prohibits employers from retaliating against those who override these systems.&nbsp; The bill defines &nbsp; artificial intelligence clinical decision support systems as technology that supports decision-making through the use of algorithms or models that are based on clinical practice guidelines or training data and that produces predictions, recommendations, evaluations, or analysis . Health care facilities, health plans, and other entities (including government entities) that employ&nbsp;health care professionals and use these systems must adopt policies that allow health care professionals to use their independent judgment to override outputs&nbsp;from these systems. Such entities must also provide training and establish a committee to advise the entity on these systems. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must enforce these requirements, including by imposing civil penalties for violations. Also, the bill prohibits these employers from taking adverse employment actions, discriminating,&nbsp;or retaliating against those who override these systems in accordance with employer policies. The Department of Labor must enforce these protections, which may include civil penalties specified in the bill.&nbsp;Individuals alleging violations of these protections may (1) submit an administrative complaint to Labor, or (2) commence a civil action. State programs receiving federal funds do not have immunity regarding such civil actions brought by employees.&nbsp; States&nbsp;may also bring civil actions against employers for violating the bill’s requirements upon notice to HHS or Labor, as appropriate.

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/5580open

Aktualität einer Unterrichtung der Bundesregierung zur Lage älterer Menschen und Digitalisierung

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 July 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Warum wird im Ausschuss für Digitales und Staatsmodernisierung des Deutschen Bundestages eine fast sechs Jahre alte Unterrichtung der Bundesregierung zur Lage älterer Menschen und Digitalisierung in Deutschland den Parlamentariern zur Kenntnis gegeben (Bundestagsdrucksache 19/21650; vgl. www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/1162132/TO-24-Sitzung.pdf, hier TOP 7), und wie aktuell sind die jüngsten der Bundesregierung zur Verfügung stehenden Daten zur Lage älterer Menschen und Digitalisierung in Deutschland?

Motion· Motie2024Z16844adopted

Motion by member Welzijn c.s. on a digitaliseringsstrategie, een meerjarig informatieplan, een samenhangend datafundament en een monitoringssystematiek voor het volkshuisvestingsbeleid

Original: Motie van het lid Welzijn c.s. over een digitaliseringsstrategie, een meerjarig informatieplan, een samenhangend datafundament en een monitoringssystematiek voor het volkshuisvestingsbeleid

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 29 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Welzijn c.s. on a digitaliseringsstrategie, een meerjarig informatieplan, een samenhangend datafundament en een monitoringssystematiek voor het volkshuisvestingsbeleid

Motion· Motie2025Z18236adopted

Motion by members Kathmann en Timmermans on a volledig Europees verbod op radicaliserende algoritmes op basis van onlinetracking of interactie

Original: Motie van de leden Kathmann en Timmermans over een volledig Europees verbod op radicaliserende algoritmes op basis van onlinetracking of interactie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 23 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Kathmann en Timmermans on a volledig Europees verbod op radicaliserende algoritmes op basis van onlinetracking of interactie

Record· Brief regering2026Z12412open

Beantwoording vragen commissie on the brieven van 20 mei 2025 regarding het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Justitie en Veiligheid (36945-VI-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (36945-VII-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Economische Zaken (36945-XIII-1), voor zon the onderwerpen betreft die zien op digitalisering

Original: Beantwoording vragen commissie over de brieven van 20 mei 2025 inzake het Jaarverslag 2025 van het Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid (36945-VI-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (36945-VII-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken (36945-XIII-1), voor zover het onderwerpen betreft die zien op digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 22 June 2026

Translated from Dutch

Beantwoording vragen commissie on the brieven van 20 mei 2025 regarding het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Justitie en Veiligheid (36945-VI-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (36945-VII-1); het Jaarverslag 2025 van het ministry of Economische Zaken (36945-XIII-1), voor zon the onderwerpen betreft die zien op digitalisering

Page 1 of 15Next