Defence

Records

Documents

Files attached to records under this subject. Downloads fetch the official source on click; nothing is stored here.

• De noodkreet van een Nederlandse militair

  Schriftelijke vragen · 23 December 2014 · De noodkreet van een Nederlandse militair

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ondersteuning Defensie aan project veteranenhulphond

  Brief regering · 23 December 2014 · Ondersteuning Defensie aan project veteranenhulphond

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Διάταξη του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (ένατο τμήμα) της 22ας Δεκεμβρίου 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad κατά Συμβουλίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.#Προσφυγή ακυρώσεως — Κοινή εξωτερική πολιτική και πολιτική ασφάλειας — Περιοριστικά μέτρα κατά της Συρίας — Δέσμευση κεφαλαίων — Καταχώρηση του ονόματος ιδιώτη στους καταλόγους των προσώπων που αφορούν τα περιοριστικά μέτρα – Δεσμοί με το καθεστώς — Δικαιώματα άμυνας — Δίκαιη δίκη — Υποχρέωση αιτιολογήσεως — Βάρος αποδείξεως — Δικαίωμα σε αποτελεσματική δικαστική προστασία — Αναλογικότητα — Δικαίωμα ιδιοκτησίας — Δικαίωμα στην ιδιωτική ζωή — Δεδικασμένο — Απαράδεκτο — Προδήλως απαράδεκτο – Προσφυγή στερούμενη παντελώς νομικής βάσεως.#Υπόθεση T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Auto del Tribunal General (Sala Novena) de 22 de diciembre de 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad contra Consejo de la Unión Europea.#Recurso de anulación — Política exterior y de seguridad común — Medidas restrictivas adoptadas contra Siria — Congelación de fondos — Inclusión de un particular en las listas de personas a las que se aplican dichas medidas — Vínculos personales con miembros del régimen — Derecho de defensa — Proceso equitativo — Obligación de motivación — Carga de la prueba — Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva — Proporcionalidad — Derecho de propiedad — Derecho a la vida privada — Fuerza de cosa juzgada — Inadmisibilidad — Inadmisibilidad manifiesta — Recurso carente de todo fundamento jurídico.#Asunto T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Usnesení Tribunálu (devátého senátu) ze dne 22. prosince 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v. Rada Evropské unie.#Žaloba na neplatnost – Společná zahraniční a bezpečnostní politika – Omezující opatření vůči Sýrii – Zmrazení finančních prostředků – Zařazení jednotlivce na seznamy dotčených osob – Osobní vztahy s představiteli režimu – Právo na obhajobu – Spravedlivý proces – Povinnost uvést odůvodnění – Důkazní břemeno – Právo na účinnou soudní ochranu – Proporcionalita – Právo vlastnit majetek – Právo na soukromý život – Překážka věci pravomocně rozsouzené – Nepřípustnost – Zjevná nepřípustnost – Žaloba po právní stránce zcela neopodstatněná.#Věc T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Vispārējās tiesas (devītā palāta) 2014. gada 22. decembra rīkojums.#Bouchra Al Assad pret Eiropas Savienības Padomi.#Prasība atcelt tiesību aktu – Kopējā ārpolitika un drošības politika – Ierobežojoši pasākumi pret Sīriju – Līdzekļu iesaldēšana – Privātpersonas iekļaušana attiecīgo personu sarakstā – Personiskas saiknes ar režīma locekļiem – Tiesības uz aizstāvību – Lietas taisnīga izskatīšana – Pienākums norādīt pamatojumu – Pierādīšanas pienākums – Tiesības uz efektīvu tiesību aizsardzību tiesā – Samērīgums – Tiesības uz īpašumu – Tiesības uz privātās dzīves neaizskaramību – Res judicata spēks – Nepieņemamība – Acīmredzama nepieņemamība – Juridiski nepamatota prasība.#Lieta T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Üldkohtu (üheksas koda) 22. detsembri 2014. aasta määrus.#Bouchra Al Assad versus Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu.#Tühistamishagi – Ühine välis- ja julgeolekupoliitika – Süüria vastu suunatud piiravad meetmed – Rahaliste vahendite külmutamine – Üksikisiku kandmine nende isikute loetellu, keda meetmed puudutavad – Isiklikud sidemed režiimi liikmetega – Kaitseõigused – Õiglane kohtulik arutamine – Põhjendamiskohustus – Tõendamiskoormis – Õigus tõhusale kohtulikule kaitsele – Proportsionaalsus – Omandiõigus – Õigus eraelule – Otsuse seadusjõud – Vastuvõetamatus – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus – Õiguslikult põhjendamatu hagi.#Kohtuasi T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Törvényszék (kilencedik tanács) 2014. december 22–i végzése.#Bouchra Al Assad kontra Az Európai Unió Tanácsa.#Megsemmisítés iránti kereset – Közös kül‑ és biztonságpolitika – Szíriával szemben hozott korlátozó intézkedések – A pénzeszközök befagyasztása – Magánszemély felvétele az érintett személyek jegyzékeibe – A rezsim tagjaival fennálló személyes kapcsolatok – Védelemhez való jog – Tisztességes eljárás – Indokolási kötelezettség – Bizonyítási teher – A hatékony bírói jogvédelemhez való jog – Arányosság – A tulajdonhoz való jog – A magánélethez való jog – Jogerő – Elfogadhatatlanság – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság – Minden jogi alapot nélkülöző kereset.#T‑407/13. sz. ügy.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ordonanța Tribunalului (Camera a noua) din 22 decembrie 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad împotriva Consiliului Uniunii Europene.#Acțiune în anulare – Politica externă și de securitate comună – Măsuri restrictive luate împotriva Siriei – Înghețarea fondurilor – Înscrierea unui particular pe listele persoanelor vizate – Legături personale cu membrii regimului – Dreptul la apărare – Proces echitabil – Obligația de motivare – Sarcina probei – Dreptul la protecție jurisdicțională efectivă – Proporționalitate – Drept de proprietate – Dreptul la viață privată – Autoritate de lucru judecat – Inadmisibilitate – Inadmisibilitate vădită – Acțiune nefondată.#Cauza T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Определение на Общия съд (девети състав) от 22 декември 2014 г.#Bouchra Al Assad срещу Съвет на Европейския съюз.#Жалба за отмяна — Обща външна политика и политика на сигурност — Ограничителни мерки срещу Сирия — Замразяване на средства — Включване на физическо лице в списъците на засегнатите лица — Лични връзки с представители на режима — Право на защита — Справедлив процес — Задължение за мотивиране — Тежест на доказване — Право на ефективна съдебна защита — Пропорционалност — Право на собственост — Право на личен живот — Сила на пресъдено нещо — Недопустимост — Явна недопустимост — Жалба, лишена от всякакво правно основание.#Дело T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 22 décembre 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de la Syrie – Gel des fonds – Inscription d’un particulier sur les listes des personnes visées – Liens personnels avec des membres du régime – Droits de la défense – Procès équitable – Obligation de motivation – Charge de la preuve – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Proportionnalité – Droit de propriété – Droit à la vie privée – Autorité de la chose jugée – Irrecevabilité – Irrecevabilité manifeste – Recours dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Beschluss des Gerichts (Neunte Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad gegen Rat der Europäischen Union.#Nichtigkeitsklage – Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik – Restriktive Maßnahmen gegen Syrien – Einfrieren von Geldern – Aufnahme einer Person in die Listen der betroffenen Personen – Persönliche Beziehungen zu Mitgliedern des Regimes – Verteidigungsrechte – Faires Verfahren – Begründungspflicht – Beweislast – Anspruch auf effektiven gerichtlichen Rechtsschutz – Verhältnismäßigkeit – Recht auf Eigentum – Recht auf Privatleben – Rechtskraft – Unzulässigkeit – Offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit – Klage, der jede rechtliche Grundlage fehlt.#Rechtssache T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Digriet tal-Qorti Ġenerali (Id-Disa’ Awla) tat-22 ta’ Diċembru 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad vs Il-Kunsill tal-Unjoni Ewropea.#Rikors għal annullament – Politika barranija u ta’ sigurtà komuni – Miżuri restrittivi meħuda kontra s-Sirja – Iffriżar ta’ fondi – Iskrizzjoni ta’ individwu fil-lista ta’ persuni kkonċernati – Rabtiet personali ma’ membri tar-reġim – Drittijiet tad-difiża – Smigħ xieraq – Obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni – Oneru tal-prova – Dritt għal protezzjoni ġudizzjarja effettiva – Proporzjonalità – Dritt għall-proprjetà – Dritt għall-ħajja privata – Awtorità ta’ res judicata – Inammissibbiltà – Inammissibbiltà manifesta – Rikors infondat fid-dritt.#Kawża T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rješenje Općeg suda (deveto vijeće) od 22. prosinca 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad protiv Vijeća Europske unije.#Tužba za poništenje – Zajednička vanjska i sigurnosna politika – Mjere ograničavanja protiv Sirije – Zamrzavanje sredstava – Uvrštavanje pojedinca na popise osoba koje podliježu mjerama ograničavanja – Osobne veze s članovima režima – Pravo na obranu – Pravični postupak – Obveza obrazlaganja – Teret dokazivanja – Pravo na djelotvornu sudsku zaštitu – Proporcionalnost – Pravo na vlasništvo – Pravo na privatan život – Načelo res iudicata – Nedopuštenost – Očita nedopuštenost – Pravno neosnovana tužba.#Predmet T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Uznesenie Všeobecného súdu (deviata komora) z 22. decembra 2014.#Bušra Al Assad proti Rade Európskej únie.#Žaloba o neplatnosť – Spoločná zahraničná a bezpečnostná politika – Reštriktívne opatrenia prijaté voči Sýrii – Zmrazenie finančných prostriedkov – Zaradenie jednotlivca na zoznamy dotknutých osôb – Osobné väzby s predstaviteľmi režimu – Právo na obhajobu – Spravodlivý proces – Povinnosť odôvodnenia – Dôkazné bremeno – Právo na účinnú súdnu ochranu – Proporcionalita – Právo vlastniť majetok – Právo na súkromie – Právna sila rozhodnutej veci – Neprípustnosť – Zjavná neprípustnosť – Žaloba zjavne bez právneho základu.#Vec T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Postanowienie Sądu (dziewiąta izba) z dnia 22 grudnia 2014 r.#Bouchra Al Assad przeciwko Radzie Unii Europejskiej.#Skarga o stwierdzenie nieważności – Wspólna polityka zagraniczna i bezpieczeństwa – Środki ograniczające przyjęte wobec Syrii – Zamrożenie funduszy – Umieszczenie jednostki w wykazach osób objętych środkami ograniczającymi – Powiązania osobiste z członkami reżimu – Prawo do obrony – Rzetelny proces sądowy – Obowiązek uzasadnienia – Ciężar dowodu – Prawo do skutecznej ochrony sądowej – Proporcjonalność – Prawo własności – Prawo do życia prywatnego – Powaga rzeczy osądzonej – Niedopuszczalność – Oczywista niedopuszczalność – Skarga pozbawiona podstawy prawnej.#Sprawa T-407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tribunalens beslut (nionde avdelningen) av den 22 december 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad mot Europeiska unionens råd.#Talan om ogiltigförklaring – Gemensam utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik – Restriktiva åtgärder mot Syrien – Frysning av tillgångar – En privatperson har uppförts på förteckningen över berörda personer – Personlig anknytning till medlemmar av regimen – Rätten till försvar – Rättvis rättegång – Motiveringsskyldighet – Bevisbörda – Rätt till ett effektivt domstolsskydd – Proportionalitet – Rätt till egendom – Rätt till respekt för privatlivet – Rättskraft – Avvisning – Uppenbart att talan ska avvisas – Talan saknar helt rättslig grund.#Mål T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Despacho do Tribunal Geral (Nona Secção) de 22 de dezembro de 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad contra Conselho da União Europeia.#Recurso de anulação – Política externa e segurança comum – Medidas restritivas contra a Síria – Congelamento de fundos – Inscrição de um particular nas listas das pessoas visadas – Ligações pessoais com os membros do regime – Direitos da defesa – Processo equitativo – Dever de fundamentação – Ónus da prova – Direito a uma proteção jurisdicional efetiva – Proporcionalidade – Direito de propriedade – Direito à vida privada – Força de caso julgado – Inadmissibilidade – Inadmissibilidade manifesta – Recurso manifestamente infundado.#Processo T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Ordinanza del Tribunale (Nona Sezione) del 22 dicembre 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad contro Consiglio dell'Unione europea.#Ricorso di annullamento – Politica estera e di sicurezza comune – Misure restrittive adottate nei confronti della Siria – Congelamento dei capitali – Iscrizione di un privato negli elenchi delle persone interessate – Legami personali con membri del regime – Diritti della difesa – Processo equo – Obbligo di motivazione – Onere della prova – Diritto ad una tutela giurisdizionale effettiva – Proporzionalità – Diritto di proprietà – Diritto alla vita privata – Autorità di cosa giudicata – Irricevibilità – Irricevibilità manifesta – Ricorso privo di qualsiasi fondamento in diritto.#Causa T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sklep Splošnega sodišča (deveti senat) z dne 22. decembra 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad proti Svetu Evropske unije.#Ničnostna tožba – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Omejevalni ukrepi zoper Sirijo – Zamrznitev sredstev – Vpis posameznika na seznam zadevnih oseb – Osebne zveze s člani režima – Pravica do obrambe – Pravični postopek – Obveznost obrazložitve – Dokazno breme – Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega varstva – Sorazmernost – Lastninska pravica – Pravica do zasebnosti – Pravnomočnost – Nedopustnost – Očitna nedopustnost – Tožba brez pravne podlage.#Zadeva T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Beschikking van het Gerecht (Negende kamer) van 22 december 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad tegen Raad van de Europese Unie.#Beroep tot nietigverklaring – Gemeenschappelijk buitenlands en veiligheidsbeleid – Beperkende maatregelen tegen Syrië – Bevriezing van tegoeden – Plaatsing van een particulier op de lijsten van personen op wie beperkende maatregelen van toepassing zijn – Persoonlijke banden met leden van het regime – Rechten van de verdediging – Eerlijk proces – Motiveringsplicht – Bewijslast – Recht op effectieve rechterlijke bescherming – Evenredigheid – Eigendomsrecht – Recht op privéleven – Gezag van gewijsde – Niet-ontvankelijkheid – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid – Beroep rechtens ongegrond.#Zaak T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rettens kendelse (Niende Afdeling) af 22. december 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Annullationssøgsmål – fælles udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik – restriktive foranstaltninger over for Syrien – indefrysning af midler – opførelse af en privatperson på listerne over omfattede personer – personligt forhold til medlemmer af regimet – ret til forsvar – retfærdig rettergang – begrundelsespligt – bevisbyrde – ret til en effektiv domstolsbeskyttelse – proportionalitet – ejendomsret – ret til privatlivets fred – retskraft – afvisning – åbenbart afvisningsgrundlag – søgsmål, der er retligt ugrundet.#Sag T-407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2014 m. gruodžio 22 d. Bendrojo Teismo (devintoji kolegija) nutartis.#Bouchra Al Assad prieš Europos Sąjungos Tarybą.#Ieškinys dėl panaikinimo – Bendra užsienio ir saugumo politika – Ribojamosios priemonės Sirijai – Lėšų įšaldymas – Privataus asmens įtraukimas į asmenų, kuriems taikomos šios priemonės, sąrašą – Asmeniniai ryšiai su režimo nariais – Teisė į gynybą – Teisingas bylos nagrinėjimas – Pareiga motyvuoti – Įrodinėjimo pareiga – Teisė į veiksmingą teisminę gynybą – Proporcingumas – Nuosavybės teisė – Teisė į privatumą – „Res judicata“ galia – Nepriimtinumas – Akivaizdus nepriimtinumas – Teisiškai nepagrįstas ieškinys.#Byla T-407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen määräys (yhdeksäs jaosto) 22.12.2014.#Bouchra Al Assad vastaan Euroopan unionin neuvosto.#Kumoamiskanne – Yhteinen ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikka – Syyriaan kohdistettavat rajoittavat toimenpiteet – Varojen jäädyttäminen – Luonnollisen henkilön kirjaaminen kyseessä olevien henkilöiden luetteloon – Henkilökohtaiset suhteet järjestelmän jäseniin – Puolustautumisoikeudet – Oikeudenmukainen oikeudenkäynti – Perusteluvelvollisuus – Todistustaakka – Oikeus tehokkaaseen oikeussuojaan – Suhteellisuus – Omistusoikeus – Oikeus yksityiselämään – Oikeusvoimavaikutus – Tutkimatta jättäminen – Tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytysten selvä puuttuminen – Täysin perusteeton kanne.#Asia T-407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  judgment · 22 December 2014 · Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Verslag van een algemeen overleg, gehouden op 5 november 2014, over Informatievoorziening en ICT bij Defensie

  Verslag van een algemeen overleg · 21 December 2014 · Plan van aanpak maatregelen IV/ICT

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Maatregelen herinrichting IT-domein Defensie in relatie tot de aanbevelingen uit de Gateway Review en het Forrester-rapport

  Brief regering · 18 December 2014 · Maatregelen herinrichting IT-domein Defensie in relatie tot de aanbevelingen uit de Gateway Review en het Forrester-rapport

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Aan bewindspersoon - reactie vragen op interview Elsevier

  Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · 18 December 2014 · Rondvraagpunt van het lid Hachchi inzake interview minister van Defensie in Elsevier van 20 deember 2014

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Lijst van vragen over voortgang van de prioritaire sourcingprojecten (Kamerstuk 31125, nr. 44).

  Lijst van vragen · 17 December 2014 · Voortgang van de prioritaire sourcingprojecten

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Motie van de leden Hachchi en Knops over problemen binnen het nu gereserveerde budget oplossen

  Motie · 17 December 2014 · Motie van de leden Hachchi en Knops over problemen binnen het nu gereserveerde budget oplossen

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Feitelijke vragen inzake voortgang prioritaire sourcingprojecten

  Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · 17 December 2014 · Voortgang van de prioritaire sourcingprojecten

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Motie van de leden Knops en Hachchi over onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden om het transitieproces uit te besteden aan een marktpartij

  Motie · 17 December 2014 · Motie van de leden Knops en Hachchi over onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden om het transitieproces uit te besteden aan een marktpartij

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Motie van de leden Knops en Hachchi over een internationale vergelijking naar de transitie

  Motie · 17 December 2014 · Motie van de leden Knops en Hachchi over een internationale vergelijking naar de transitie

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Motie van de leden Hachchi en Knops over een plan van aanpak ter verbetering van de informatievoorziening en ICT

  Motie · 17 December 2014 · Motie van de leden Hachchi en Knops over een plan van aanpak ter verbetering van de informatievoorziening en ICT

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Vispārējās tiesas (otrā palāta) 2014. gada 17. decembra spriedums.#Pilkington Group Ltd u.c. pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Konkurence – Aizliegtas vienošanās – Automašīnu stiklu Eiropas tirgus – Lēmums, ar kuru konstatēts EKL 81. panta pārkāpums – Nolīgumi par tirgu sadali un apmaiņa ar komerciāli sensitīvu informāciju – Naudas sodi – Tiesības uz aizstāvību – 2006. gada pamatnostādņu naudas soda aprēķināšanai piemērošana ar atpakaļejošu spēku – Pārdošanas apjoma vērtība – Pasīva vai maznozīmīga loma – Naudas soda preventīvā iedarbība – Iepriekš piemērotu naudas sodu ņemšana vērā – Naudas soda maksimālais apmērs – Valūtas maiņas kurss naudas soda maksimālā apmēra aprēķinam.#Lieta T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Gerecht (Tweede kamer) van 17 december 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd e.a. tegen Europese Commissie.#Mededinging – Mededingingsregelingen – Europese markt voor autoglas – Beschikking houdende vaststelling van een inbreuk op artikel 81 EG – Afspraken tot verdeling van markten en uitwisseling van commercieel gevoelige informatie – Geldboeten – Rechten van verdediging – Toepassing met terugwerkende kracht van de richtsnoeren van 2006 voor de berekening van geldboeten – Waarde van de verkopen – Passieve of geringe rol – Afschrikkende werking van de geldboete – Inaanmerkingneming van voordien opgelegde geldboeten – Plafond van de geldboete – Wisselkoers voor de berekening van het plafond van de geldboete.#Zaak T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Općeg suda (drugo vijeće) od 17. prosinca 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd i dr. protiv Europske komisije.#Tržišno natjecanje – Zabranjeni sporazumi – Europsko tržište automobilskog stakla – Odluka kojom se utvrđuje povreda članka 81. UEZ-a – Sporazumi o podjeli tržišta i razmjeni tržišno osjetljivih informacija – Novčane kazne – Pravo na obranu – Retroaktivna primjena Smjernica o metodi za utvrđivanje kazni iz 2006. – Vrijednost prodaje – Pasivna ili sporedna uloga – Preventivni učinak novčane kazne – Uzimanje u obzir ranije izrečenih novčanih kazni – Gornja granica novčane kazne – Tečaj za izračun gornje granice novčane kazne.#Predmet T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Общия съд (втори състав) от 17 декември 2014 г.#Pilkington Group Ltd и др. срещу Европейска комисия.#Конкуренция — Картели — Европейски пазар на автомобилно стъкло — Решение, с което се установява нарушение на член 81 ЕО — Споразумения за подялба на пазари и обмен на чувствителна търговска информация — Глоби — Право на защита — Прилагане с обратна сила на Насоките относно метода за определяне на глобите от 2006 г. — Стойност на продажбите — Пасивна или незначителна роля — Възпиращо действие на глобата — Вземане предвид на по-рано наложени глоби — Таван на глобата — Обменен курс, използван за изчисляването на тавана на глобата.#Дело T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (It-Tieni Awla) tas-17 ta’ Diċembru 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd et vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Kompetizzjoni – Akkordji – Suq Ewropew tal-ħġieġ tal-karozzi – Deċiżjoni li tikkonstata ksur tal-Artikolu 81 KE – Ftehim ta’ qsim tas-swieq u skambju ta’ informazzjoni kummerċjali sensittiva – Multi – Drittijiet tad-difiża – Applikazzjoni retroattiva tal-linji gwida għall-kalkolu tal-ammont tal-multi tal-2006 – Valur tal-bejgħ – Rwol passiv jew minuri – Effett dissważiv tal-multa – Teħid inkunsiderazzjoni tal-multi imposti preċedentement – Limitu tal-multa – Rata ta’ kambju għall-kalkolu tal-limitu tal-multa.#Kawża T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• 2014 m. gruodžio 17 d. Bendrojo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#Pilkington Group Ltd ir kt. prieš Europos Komisiją.#Konkurencija – Karteliai – Europos automobilių stiklo rinka – Sprendimas, kuriuo konstatuojamas EB 81 straipsnio pažeidimas – Susitarimai dėl rinkų pasidalijimo ir apsikeitimo svarbia komercine informacija – Baudos – Teisė į gynybą – 2006 m. baudų apskaičiavimo gairių taikymas atgaline data – Pardavimų vertė – Pasyvus arba mažareikšmis vaidmuo – Atgrasomasis baudos poveikis – Atsižvelgimas į anksčiau paskirtas baudas – Maksimali bauda – Keitimo kursas apskaičiuojant maksimalią baudą.#Byla T-72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Üldkohtu (teine koda) 17. detsembri 2014. aasta otsus.#Pilkington Group Ltd jt versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Konkurents – Keelatud kokkulepped – Euroopa autoklaasi turg – EÜ artikli 81 rikkumise tuvastamise otsus – Turgude jagamise kokkulepped ja tundliku äriteabe vahetamine – Trahvid – Kaitseõigused – 2006. aasta trahvide arvutamise meetodi suuniste tagasiulatuv kohaldamine – Müügiväärtus – Passiivne või vähetähtis roll – Trahvi hoiatav mõju – Varem määratud trahvide arvesse võtmine – Trahvi ülempiir – Vahetuskurss trahvi ülempiiri arvutamiseks.#Kohtuasi T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza del Tribunale (Seconda Sezione) del 17 dicembre 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd e a. contro Commissione europea.#Concorrenza – Intese – Mercato europeo del vetro destinato al settore auto – Decisione che accerta un’infrazione all’articolo 81 CE – Accordi di ripartizione dei mercati e scambi di informazioni commercialmente sensibili – Ammende – Diritti della difesa – Applicazione retroattiva degli orientamenti per il calcolo dell’importo delle ammende del 2006 – Valore delle vendite – Ruolo passivo o minore – Effetto dissuasivo dell’ammenda – Presa in considerazione delle ammende inflitte in passato – Tetto massimo dell’ammenda – Tasso di cambio per il calcolo del limite massimo dell’ammenda.#Causa T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 17.12.2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd ym. vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Kilpailu – Kartellit tai muut yhteistoimintajärjestelyt – Autolasialan Euroopan markkinat – Päätös, jossa todetaan EY 81 artiklan rikkominen – Markkinoiden jakoa ja kaupallisesti arkaluonteisten tietojen vaihtoa koskevat sopimukset – Sakot – Puolustautumisoikeudet – Sakkojen laskennasta annettujen vuoden 2006 suuntaviivojen taannehtiva soveltaminen – Myynnin arvo – Passiivisuus tai seurailijan asema – Sakon estävä vaikutus – Aiemmin määrättyjen sakkojen huomioon ottaminen – Sakon enimmäismäärä – Sakon enimmäismäärän laskennassa käytettävä vaihtokurssi.#Asia T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd κ.λπ. κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Ανταγωνισμός – Συμπράξεις – Ευρωπαϊκή αγορά των υαλοπινάκων οχημάτων – Απόφαση διαπιστώνουσα παράβαση του άρθρου 81 ΕΚ – Συμφωνίες περί κατανομής των αγορών και ανταλλαγές ευαίσθητων εμπορικών πληροφοριών – Πρόστιμα – Δικαιώματα άμυνας – Αναδρομική εφαρμογή των κατευθυντηρίων γραμμών του 2006 για τον υπολογισμό του ύψους των προστίμων – Αξία των πωλήσεων – Παθητικός ή ελάσσων ρόλος – Αποτρεπτική ενέργεια του προστίμου – Συνυπολογισμός προγενεστέρως επιβληθέντων προστίμων – Ανώτατο ποσό του προστίμου – Συναλλαγματική ισοτιμία για τον υπολογισμό του ανωτάτου ποσού του προστίμου.#Υπόθεση T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• A Törvényszék (második tanács) 2014. december 17‑i ítélete.#Pilkington Group Ltd és társai kontra Európai Bizottság.#Verseny – Kartellek – A járműipari üveg európai piaca – Az EK 81. cikk megsértését megállapító határozat – Piacfelosztó és kereskedelmi szempontból érzékeny információk cseréjében való megállapodások – Bírságok – Védelemhez való jog – A 2006. évi bírságkiszabási iránymutatás visszaható hatályú alkalmazása – Az eladások értéke – Passzív vagy csekély szerep – A bírság elrettentő hatása – Korábban kiszabott bírságok figyelembevétele – A bírság felső határa – A bírság felső határának kiszámításakor figyelembe vett árfolyam.#T‑72/09. sz. ügy.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rettens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 17. december 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Konkurrence – karteller – det europæiske marked for autoglas – beslutning, der fastslår en overtrædelse af artikel 81 EF – aftaler om opdeling af markeder og udveksling af forretningsmæssigt følsomme oplysninger – bøder – ret til forsvar – anvendelse med tilbagevirkende kraft af retningslinjerne af 2006 for beregning af bøder – afsætningsværdi – passiv eller begrænset rolle – bødens afskrækkende virkning – hensyntagen til tidligere pålagte bøder – bødeloft – vekselkurs for beregning af bødeloftet.#Sag T-72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Segunda) de 17 de diciembre de 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd y otros contra Comisión Europea.#Competencia — Prácticas colusorias — Mercado europeo del vidrio para automóviles — Decisión por la que se declara la existencia de una infracción del artículo 81 CE — Acuerdos de reparto de mercados e intercambios de información comercialmente sensible — Multas — Derecho de defensa — Aplicación retroactiva de las Directrices de 2006 para el cálculo de las multas — Valor de las ventas — Papel pasivo o de menor importancia — Efecto disuasorio de la multa — Consideración de las multas aplicadas anteriormente — Límite máximo de la multa — Tipo de cambio aplicable para el cálculo de la multa.#Asunto T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (druhá komora) zo 17. decembra 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd a i. proti Európskej komisii.#Hospodárska súťaž – Kartely – Európsky trh s autosklom – Rozhodnutie, ktorým sa konštatuje porušenie článku 81 ES – Dohody o rozdelení trhov a výmene citlivých obchodných informácií – Pokuty – Právo na obhajobu – Retroaktívne uplatnenie usmernení na výpočet výšky pokút z roku 2006 – Hodnota predajov – Pasívna alebo okrajová úloha – Odstrašujúci účinok pokuty – Zohľadnenie skôr uložených pokút – Maximálna výška pokuty – Výmenný kurz na výpočet maximálnej výšky pokuty.#Vec T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Tribunalens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 17 december 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd m.fl. mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Konkurrens – Konkurrensbegränsande samverkan – Europeiska marknaden för bilglas – Beslut i vilket en överträdelse av artikel 81 EG konstateras – Avtal om uppdelning av marknader och utbyte av kommersiellt känslig information – Böter – Rätten till försvar – Retroaktiv tillämpning av 2006 års riktlinjer för beräkning av böter – Försäljningsvärde – Passiv eller underordnad roll – Böternas avskräckande verkan – Beaktande av tidigare ålagda böter – Tak för böterna – Växelkurs vid beräkningen av taket för böterna.#Mål T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Splošnega sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 17. decembra 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd in drugi proti Evropski komisiji.#Konkurenca – Omejevalni sporazumi – Evropski trg avtomobilskih stekel – Odločba o ugotovitvi kršitve člena 81 ES – Sporazum o razdelitvi trga in izmenjavi poslovno občutljivih informacij – Globe – Pravica do obrambe – Retroaktivna uporaba smernic za izračun zneskov glob za leto 2006 – Vrednost prodaje – Pasivna ali manj pomembna vloga – Odvračilni učinek globe – Upoštevanje prej naloženih glob – Zgornja meja globe – Menjalni tečaj za izračun zgornje meje globe.#Zadeva T‑72/09.

  judgment · 17 December 2014 · Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

  DownloadOpen at official source