other

efbe2eef-8e65-4b47-ba73-ac0f0541c9a4

Members

No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0242decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019.#'UniCredit Leasing' EAD v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' – Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (NAP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Lease finance agreement terminated for failure to make monthly payments – Notice of adjustment – Scope – Taxable transactions – Supply of goods for consideration – Payment of ‘compensation’ for termination up to expiry of the agreement – Jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-242/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0001decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#SIA 'Oribalt Rīga v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 30(2)(b) and (c) – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 152(1)(a) and (b) – Determination of the customs value of the goods – Definition of ‘similar goods’ – Medicinal products – Account taken of any factor that may have an impact on the economic value of the medicinal product concerned – Time limit of 90 days within which the imported goods must be sold in the European Union – Mandatory time limit – No account taken of trade discounts.#Case C-1/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0660decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2019.#RF v European Commission.#Appeal — Action for annulment — Sending of the application by fax — Original of the application lodged out of time at the Registry of the General Court — Postal delay — Concept of ‘force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances’.#Case C-660/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0591decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2019.#Republic of Austria v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU — Legislation of a Member State prescribing an infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles — Situation in which owners of vehicles registered in that Member State qualify for relief from motor vehicle tax in an amount corresponding to that charge.#Case C-591/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0038decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#GT v HS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 3(1) — Article 4(2) — Article 6(1) — Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency — The exchange rate applicable to the sum made available in domestic currency communicated to the consumer after the agreement has been concluded.#Case C-38/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0052decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Christian Fülla v Toolport GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Norderstedt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 1999/44/EC — Lack of conformity of the goods delivered — Article 3 — Right of the consumer to repair or replacement of the goods free of charge, within a reasonable time and without any significant inconvenience — Determination of where the consumer must make goods acquired under a distance contract available to the seller to be brought into conformity — Concept of bringing the goods into conformity ‘free of charge’ — Right of the consumer to rescind the contract.#Case C-52/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0706decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2019.#Achema AB and Others v Valstybinė kainų ir energetikos kontrolės komisija (VKEKK).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Concept of ‘aid granted by a Member State or through State resources’ — Measures intended to compensate providers of public interest services in the electricity sector — Concept of aid ‘affecting trade between Member States’ and ‘distorting or threatening to distort competition’ — Concept of ‘selective advantage’ — Service of general economic interest — Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations.#Case C-706/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0294decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#Proceedings brought by Oulun Sähkönmyynti Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Energy efficiency — Directive 2012/27/EU — Article 11(1) — Cost of access to metering and billing information — Right of final customers to receive all their bills and billing information relating to their energy consumption free of charge — Electricity network charges — Discount on electricity network charges granted by an electricity retail sales company to customers who have chosen electronic billing.#Case C-294/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 May 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0545decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#Proceedings brought by DP and Finanzamt Linz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Principles of EU law — Primacy — National rules requiring the lower courts to follow the interpretation of the higher courts — Restriction of the matters referred to the higher courts to the assessment of points of law and of the pleas raised before the lower courts.#Case C-545/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0617decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2019.#Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 82 EC — Abuse of a dominant position — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 3(1) — Application of national competition law — Decision of a national competition authority to impose one fine on the basis of national law and another on the basis of EU law — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Principle of ne bis in idem — Whether applicable.#Case C-617/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0427decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#European Commission v Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Collection and treatment of urban waste water — Exceptional circumstances — Best technical knowledge not entailing excessive costs — Principle that the costs should be proportionate — Burden of proof — Means of proof.#Case C-427/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0702decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2019.#Unareti SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in natural gas –Public service distribution concessions — Early termination of concessions at the end of a transitional period — Reimbursement by the incoming concessionaire to the outgoing concessionaire — Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-702/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0330decided

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019.#Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.#Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid.#Case C-330/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0462decided

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019.#Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament.#Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid.#Case C-462/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0700decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 March 2019.#Hungary Restaurant Company Kft. and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Action for annulment — Article 263, sixth paragraph, TFEU — Starting point of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings — Action brought more than two months after the date of publication of the act concerned in the Official Journal of the European Union — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-700/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0428decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2019.#Meta Group Srl v European Commission.#Appeal — Arbitration clause — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Sixth Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2002-2006) — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — Amounts allegedly owed by the European Commission in relation to the performance of those agreements — Outstanding balance of the total amount of the financial contribution granted to the appellant — Contractual liability.#Case C-428/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0399decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 March 2019.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Shipment of waste — Refusal of the Czech Republic to ensure the take-back of the mixture TPS-NOLO (Geobal) shipped from that Member State to Poland — Existence of waste — Burden of proof — Proof.#Case C-399/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0635decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits.#Case C-635/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0128decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Directive (EU) 2016/2284 — Reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants — Adoption of EU legal acts — Course of the legislative procedure — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Actual exercise of the EU legislature’s discretion — Impact assessment — Sufficient assessment of the effects of the contested measure — Article 5(4) TEU — Principle of proportionality — Article 4(2) TEU — Equality of Member States before the Treaties — Article 191(2) TFEU — Environmental policy of the European Union — Consideration of the diversity of the regions of the European Union — Judicial review.#Case C-128/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0392decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 19, third and fourth paras of the Statute of the European Court of Justice– Article 119(2) and (3), of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Applicant being a lawyer and acting by himself before the Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-392/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0497decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019.#Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 13 TFEU — Animal welfare — Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 — Protection of animals at the time of killing — Particular methods of slaughter prescribed by religious rites — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Articles 3 and 14(1)(b)(viii) — Compatibility with organic production — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — First paragraph of Article 57 — Organic production logo of the European Union.#Case C-497/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0231decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#NK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Road transport — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 — Obligation to use a tachograph — Exception for vehicles used for the carriage of live animals from farms to local markets and vice versa or from markets to local slaughterhouses.#Case C-231/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 February 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0724decided

Julkisasiamies N. Wahlin ratkaisuehdotus 6.2.2019.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0591decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 6 February 2019.#Republic of Austria v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 18, 34, 56 and 92 TFEU — Legislation of a Member State prescribing an infrastructure use charge for passenger vehicles — Situation in which owners of vehicles registered in that Member State qualify for relief from motor vehicle tax in an amount corresponding to that charge.#Case C-591/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0587decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 January 2019.#Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission.#Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Expenses excluded from financing by the European Union — Unduly paid export refunds — Recovery — Not all judicial remedies were exhausted — No appeal on a point of law following the negative opinion of a lawyer authorised to act before the Cour de cassation (Belgium) — Article 267 TFEU — No reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice — Negligence on the part of a Member State.#Case C-587/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0660decided

Opinia rzecznika generalnego N. Wahla przedstawiona w dniu 24 stycznia 2019 r.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 January 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0477decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 January 2019.#Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v D. Balandin and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 — Applicable legislation — A1 certificate — Article 1 — Extension of A1 certificate to nationals of third countries residing legally in the territory of a Member State — Legal residence — Concept.#Case C-477/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 January 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0326decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 January 2019.#Directie van de Dienst Wegverkeer (RDW) v X et Y, X and Y v Directie van de Dienst Wegverkeer (RDW) and Directie van de Dienst Wegverkeer (RDW) v Z.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 1999/37/EC — Registration documents for vehicles — Omissions in the registration certificates — Mutual recognition — Directive 2007/46/EC — Vehicles manufactured prior to EU harmonisation of technical requirements — Alterations having an impact on the technical characteristics of the vehicle.#Case C-326/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 January 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0001decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 24 January 2019.#SIA 'Oribalt Rīga v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 30(2)(b) and (c) – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 152(1)(a) and (b) – Determination of the customs value of the goods – Definition of ‘similar goods’ – Medicinal products – Account taken of any factor that may have an impact on the economic value of the medicinal product concerned – Time limit of 90 days within which the imported goods must be sold in the European Union – Mandatory time limit – No account taken of trade discounts.#Case C-1/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 January 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0387decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 January 2019.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Existing aid and new aid – Classification – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 1(b)(iv) and (v) – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Applicability – Subsidies granted before the liberalisation of a market initially closed to competition – Action for damages against the Member State brought by a competitor of the beneficiary company.#Case C-387/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 January 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0706decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 17 January 2019.#Achema AB and Others v Valstybinė kainų ir energetikos kontrolės komisija (VKEKK).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Concept of ‘aid granted by a Member State or through State resources’ — Measures intended to compensate providers of public interest services in the electricity sector — Concept of aid ‘affecting trade between Member States’ and ‘distorting or threatening to distort competition’ — Concept of ‘selective advantage’ — Service of general economic interest — Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations.#Case C-706/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0052decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 15 January 2019.#Christian Fülla v Toolport GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Norderstedt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 1999/44/EC — Lack of conformity of the goods delivered — Article 3 — Right of the consumer to repair or replacement of the goods free of charge, within a reasonable time and without any significant inconvenience — Determination of where the consumer must make goods acquired under a distance contract available to the seller to be brought into conformity — Concept of bringing the goods into conformity ‘free of charge’ — Right of the consumer to rescind the contract.#Case C-52/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0410decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2019.#Proceedings brought by A Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Article 14(1) — Article 24(1) — Transactions for consideration — Transactions for consideration constituted partly by services or goods — Demolition contract — Purchase contract for dismantling.#Case C-410/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0444decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 January 2019.#Proceedings brought by Fluctus s.r.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#References for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Games of chance — Gambling monopoly in a Member State — Monopolistic advertising practices — Criteria for assessment — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-444/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 January 2019

Record· COCELEX 62017CO0033decided